1 / 7

Learning from imGoats experiences with Outcome Mapping

Learning from imGoats experiences with Outcome Mapping . Presented by Ann Braun at the imGoats Learning & Reflection Workshop, 2-6 July 2012, Udaipur, India. Design, Planning, Mgmt, Monitoring, Evaluation, Reporting and the Project/Programme Cycle. Completion/Transition. E. E. E.

lowell
Download Presentation

Learning from imGoats experiences with Outcome Mapping

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Learning from imGoats experiences with Outcome Mapping Presented by Ann Braun at the imGoats Learning & Reflection Workshop, 2-6 July 2012, Udaipur, India

  2. Design, Planning, Mgmt, Monitoring, Evaluation, Reporting and the Project/Programme Cycle Completion/Transition E E E Implement Identify Implement Identify MP, MGMT, R Design & Plan Knowledge from research & evaluation Design | Plan Design Programme Plan ImplementationDesign & Plan M&E

  3. Plan

  4. Guidance: Morning Session Key Q: What went well & less well in our application of OM? Process: • Sit together in teams: India & Moz • Discuss the five KQs and prepare responses (30-40 mins) • What went well in your application of OM (data collection, management, analysis, use, etc.)? • What went less well? • What did you do to meet the problems/issues that arose? • What did you do to take advantage of any positive experiences with OM? • What have you learned about applying OM in imGoats? • Choose a representative from your team. Reps from each team will interview each other using the five KQs, and following up with probing questions. (60 mins; Audience may also ask follow up questions; Ann will moderate. Comms team will document the interview) • Sum up: Key points and emerging questions (volunteer, 5 mins)

  5. Guidance: Afternoon Session Three Key Qs: We’ll take them one at a time KQ1: Considering the full set of progress markers for each boundary partner, how much progress has there been towards intended outcomes? Process: • 20 mins max to prepare your findings and display them on flip charts (for each boundary partner. • 15-20 mins to visit the display of the other team and ask questions • Team members take it in turns to stay with your flip charts and explain/respond questions of visitors

  6. Guidance: Afternoon Session KQ2: How relevant were your PMs? Process: • Using the computer, carry out an analysis for each BP: highlighting the relevant/useful PMs in green; the irrelevant PMs in red; and identify any PMs that you feel should have been part of the set. (20 mins) • Present your analysis (20 mins per team including Q&A) • Haile: Observations, comments, feedback

  7. Guidance: Afternoon Session KQ3: What do today’s exercises today tell us about: • how change (expected & unexpected) happens • the applicability and usefulness of progress markers and of OM in general in imGoats? Process: • Group discussion using fishbowl technique facilitated by Ewen (max 30 mins) Summary: Key points and emerging questions from this entire session (Kees, 5-10 mins) Closing Reflections: Tezira, Dr. Hegede

More Related