1 / 15

Renewable Energy IPP Procurement Programme Update Briefing to Parliamentary Portfolio Committee

Renewable Energy IPP Procurement Programme Update Briefing to Parliamentary Portfolio Committee April 2012. Introduction. The Minister determined, in consultation with NERSA, that New Generation Capacity is required in accordance with the IRP2010.

lowell
Download Presentation

Renewable Energy IPP Procurement Programme Update Briefing to Parliamentary Portfolio Committee

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Renewable Energy IPP Procurement Programme Update Briefing to Parliamentary Portfolio Committee April 2012

  2. Introduction • The Minister determined, in consultation with NERSA, that New Generation Capacity is required in accordance with the IRP2010. • The determination provides for procurement of 3725MW across different technologies (inclusive of 100 MW Small Projects). • Procurement documents were prepared and approved by the DG to procure power from the private sector. (save for the 100 MW Small Projects) • The procurement documents were released on the 03 of August 2011 and compulsory bidders conference for the first and second window, was on the 14 of September 2011. • 53 Bids were received by the 4th of November and evaluation was conducted in a secure environment at Gallagher Convention Centre between the 4th November and 28th November 2011. • All evaluation rooms were under 24 hours voice and visual recordings, all the records are with DoE security for future reference.

  3. Procurement Process Background Procurement documents To be concluded in Phase 1

  4. Procurement Process Background Request for Proposal (RFP)

  5. Overview of evaluation process.

  6. General Evaluation Observations • Comprehensive evaluation template developed in accordance with the RFP prior to accessing the evaluation venue. • Comprehensive training of all evaluators in all different disciplines in the use of the template. • Moderation of all evaluators work by independent evaluators. • Cross moderation in respect of finance.

  7. Evaluation Composition Evaluation team: Evaluation Streams: Environment Land right Application for land use Municipal land – rights Own Build – right over land Land Notarial lease registration Proof of land use application Commercial legal Acceptance of the PPA Project structure Economic Development Contributor status level Compliance with threshold Financial Full and partial price indexation Technical Eligibility Energy resource • International reviewers • Legal review – Linklaters (UK) • Technical review – Tony Wheeler Consulting (UK) • Financial review – cross-moderation between the two Financial Advisor firms • Governance review – Ernst & Young • Legal evaluation team • Bowman Gilfillan, • Edward Nathan Sonnebergs, • Ledwaba Mazwai • Webber Wentzel • Technical evaluation team • Matt Macdonald • Financial evaluation team • Ernst & Young • PWC

  8. Overall recommendations(Phase 1)

  9. Recommended Preferred Bidders(Technology allocations)

  10. Recommended Preferred Bidders – PV

  11. Recommended Preferred Bidders –PV

  12. Recommended Preferred Bidders – Wind

  13. Recommended Preferred Bidders – CSP

  14. Findings of independent review teams • Independent legal review “appropriate process was undertaken to ensure a consistent approach” • Independent technical review “TWC is also satisfied that the technical evaluation has been undertaken in accordance with the agreed methodology” • Financial cross-moderation The final results from the financial team reflects the cross-moderation between financial firms. • Governance review “we did not observe evidence of breaches in governance with impact on the validity of the overall process recommendations”

  15. Thank You

More Related