1 / 9

ECE 667 Spring 2011 Synthesis and Verification of Digital Systems

ECE 667 Spring 2011 Synthesis and Verification of Digital Systems. FSM Traversal. O. X. (s,x). (s,x). s. s’. R. Finite State Machine (FSM) Model. FSM M(X,S, , ,O) Inputs: X Outputs: O States: S Next state function, (s,x) : S  X  S

loyal
Download Presentation

ECE 667 Spring 2011 Synthesis and Verification of Digital Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ECE 667Spring 2011Synthesis and Verificationof Digital Systems FSM Traversal ECE 667 - Synthesis & Verification

  2. O X (s,x) (s,x) s s’ R Finite State Machine (FSM) Model • FSM M(X,S, , ,O) • Inputs: X • Outputs: O • States: S • Next state function, (s,x) : S  X  S • Output function, (s,x) : S X  O ECE 667 - Synthesis & Verification

  3. 1/0 0/1 s0 s1 s2 1/0 0/1 FSM Traversal • State Transition Graphs • directed graphs with labeled nodes and arcs (transitions) • symbolic state traversal methods • important for symbolic verification, state reachability analysis, FSM traversal, etc. 0/0 ECE 667 - Synthesis & Verification

  4. Existential Quantification • Existential quantification (abstraction) xf = f |x=0+ f |x=1 • Example: x(x y + z) = y + z • Note: xf does not depend on x (smoothing) • Useful in symbolic image computation (deriving sets of states) ECE 667 - Synthesis & Verification

  5. Existential Quantification - cont’d • Function can be existentially quantified w.r.to a vector: X = x1x2… Xf = x1x2...f = x1 x2 ...f • Can be done efficiently directly on a BDD • Very useful in computing sets of states • Image computation: next states • Pre-Image computation: previous states from a given set of initial states ECE 667 - Synthesis & Verification

  6. R(u,v) S(u) Img(v) Image Computation • Computing set of next states from a given initial state (or set of states) Img( S,R ) = uS(u)• R(u,v) • FSM: when transitions are labeled with input predicates x, quantify w.r.to all inputs (primary inputs and state var) • Img( S,R ) = x uS(u)• R(x,u,v) ECE 667 - Synthesis & Verification

  7. s2 a a xy XY 01 s1 s4 1 00 01 0 00 10 - 10 11 ………. 00 a’ 11 10 s3 Image Computation - example Compute a set of next states from state s1 • Encode the states: s1=00, s2=01, s3=10, s4=11 • Write transition relations for the encoded states: R = (ax’y’X’Y + a’x’y’XY’ + xy’XY + ….) ECE 667 - Synthesis & Verification

  8. s2 a 01 s1 s4 00 a’ 11 10 s3 Example - cont’d • Compute Image from s1 under R Img( s1,R ) = a xy s1(x,y) • R(a,x,y,X,Y) =a xy(x’y’)• (ax’y’X’Y + a’x’y’XY’ + xy’XY + ….) = axy(ax’y’X’Y + a’x’y’XY’ ) = (X’Y + XY’ ) = {01, 10} = {s2, s3} Result: a set of next states for all inputs s1  {s2, s3} ECE 667 - Synthesis & Verification

  9. Pre-Image Computation • Computing a set of present states from a given next state (or set of states) Pre-Img( S’,R) = vR(u,v) )• S’(v) R(u,v) S’(v) Pre-Img(u) • Similar to Image computation, except that quantification is done w.r.to next state variables • The result: a set of states backward reachable from state set S’, expressed in present state variables u • Useful in computing CTL formulas: AF, EF ECE 667 - Synthesis & Verification

More Related