240 likes | 407 Views
Cootes Paradise Phosphorus Budget and Model Work. Jim Moore JEMSys Software Systems Inc. April 2005. Background. Bay of Quinte: two reports by Minns et al. (2004) for Bay of Quinte Scope limited solely to adapting their work to Cootes Paradise Data limited to:
E N D
Cootes Paradise PhosphorusBudget and Model Work Jim Moore JEMSys Software Systems Inc. April 2005
Background • Bay of Quinte: two reports by Minns et al. (2004) for Bay of Quinte • Scope limited solely to adapting their work to Cootes Paradise • Data limited to: a) that collected by Simser (2004) and b) generated by Aquafor Beech (2005)
Overview • Loadings reports do not account for outputs • Objective 1: Water budget • Objective 2: Phosphorus concentrations and budget • Objective 3: Model predicting water column P conc.
Morphometry Model • Elevation (m): 74.8 (74.2 - 75.7) • Volume (1000 m3): 713.1 (3.8 - 2742.0) • Area (ha): 173.6 (20.4 - 287.3) • Mean Depth (cm): 41.1 (1.9 - 95.5)
Water Budget Data Sources • Levels: CHS Burlington • Creek flows: Aquafor Beech report • Precipitation: DOE Mount Hope • Evaporation: Meredith (1975) equations • STP and summer CSO flows: Simser collection • Urban runoff and other CSO: as in 2nd loadings report • Groundwater: after Ptacek et al. (2004)
Water Budget Summary • Creeks dominate • Other flows significant in summer • Large annual changes in volume
Water Budget Summary • High flushing rates
Exchange Flow Model • QOUT = Q1 - Q2 • Q2 = Alpha * QOUT
P Budget Data Sources • Creeks: Aquafor Beech report; wet-dry, except Spencer • Precipitation: 60 ug/l after Kuntz (1980) for Burlington • STP flows: Simser collection • CSO flows: 2130 ug/l, Simser collection • Urban runoff: 330 ug/l, loadings report • Groundwater: 30 ug/l, after Ptacek et al. (2004) • Water column: CP1/CP2, Simser collection • Settling rate: 0.115 m/day, Minns et. al (2004) • Harbour: annual means, 2nd loadings report
Problem w/ Sediment Model ? • As much as 100% settling per day • Reflux estimates only reflect settling rate
Dynamic Model • Minns (1986) (simple model) • Daily time-step, historical and future 15-year periods • Driven by same data as budget • Hydrological sub-model, simulates all elements of water budget • Water column phosphorus sub-model simulating elements of phosphorus budget • Goal: Predict water column P concentration • Sediment sub-model: sedimentation, reflux, and burial processes
Model Problems • Instability: • Inflows can overwhelm water column store • Settling often overwhelms water column store • Can’t predict reflux • May only be useful if sediments are ignored • May be useful as a gaming tool
300 Predicted Conc (ug/l) 150 0 0 150 300 Mean Summer P Conc (ug/l) Predicting Summer P • sediment model off • exchange flow off
Highlights • Very dynamic hydrologic regime • Very high flushing rates • Focus on net positive loads • Possible tool for gaming
Next Steps • Confirm morphometry model • Check wet/dry creeks method • Confirm Chedoke (too low??) • Confirm urban runoff • Need working sediment model • Bound exchange flow estimates • Need full-season data