160 likes | 317 Views
Emissions Collection and Monitoring Plan System Timeline and Regulatory Update. Stakeholder Meeting May 2, 2005 Matthew Boze, EPA. Adjusted Timeline. Proposed modified timeline 2005 - Spring 2006: Continue initial development of the ECMPS client tool;
E N D
Emissions Collection and Monitoring Plan System Timeline and Regulatory Update Stakeholder Meeting May 2, 2005 Matthew Boze, EPA
Adjusted Timeline • Proposed modified timeline • 2005 - Spring 2006: Continue initial development of the ECMPS client tool; • Fall/Winter 2005: Limited alpha testing of web services, queuing, and check engine functionality; • Mid 2006 - 2007: First user beta-testing in parallel to the current ETS-FTP process; • 2007: Early opt-in to ECMPS process as the official submission allowed; • 2008: Official release of the Client Tool and start of ECMPS transition period; • 2009: All sources must submit using ECMPS Client Tool
Details about New Timeline • Sources who wish to opt-in to using the ECMPS process as the official submission rather than the current ETS-FTP process in 2007 (considered a testing year) will need to notify CAMD. • Note that EPA will need for all of the data used for compliance for a given year (or season) to have been submitted using either the ETS-FTP process or the new ECMPS Client Tool process and will not be able to support annual reconciliation for a mixed set of submissions. (This applies to 2007 and 2008.) • Sources who wish to transition mid-year may do so, but will need to resubmit prior quarterly data through the new process.
Regulatory Highlights • Allow sources who designate themselves in “long term cold storage” to suspend quarterly emissions reporting until they resume operating. • Notice requirements would be added to §75.6. • Incorporate EPA’s new policy on the application of substitute data (PQ15.5) • PMA required for all hours (including missing data periods). • PMA for each hour determines appropriate substitute data value for each individual hour.
Regulatory Highlights • Add to Appendix F, Equations N-1 and N-2 for calculating NOx Mass Rate (lb/hr) by creating F-26a and F-26b. (F-26 becomes F-26c) • Adopt moisture default values for natural gas. • Remove requirement that Monitoring Plan be submitted with every quarterly emissions report. • Monitoring plan updates will be submitted prior to or concurrent with the quarterly report.
Regulatory Highlights • Revise §75.53 • Current Monitoring Plan requirements of paragraphs (e) and (f) effective through the 2008 transition period; expire in 2009. • New proposed requirements in paragraphs (g) and (h) to become effective in 2007 for sources who “opt-in” to the new process early. • In 2009 paragraphs only the new requirements in proposed paragraphs (g) and (h) will be applicable.
Monitoring Plan Content Revisions • Monitoring methods are to be identified on a monitoring location basis, rather than being based on the unit. • Identify the bypass approach within the primary monitoring location information, • Rather than listing a separate monitoring method for a given parameter for bypass situations; • Only one monitoring methodology per parameter needed.
Monitoring Plan Content Revisions • Revised monitoring plan format will NOT include: • Facility Short Name; • Unit Program Classification; • Unit Boiler Type; • Date of Commence Operation (SUB H); • Date of First Commence Commercial Operation (ARP); • Unit Retirement Date; Program Code; • Reporting Frequency; Program Participation Date; • State Regulation Code; State of Local Agency Code; • All EIA Cross Reference Information.
Monitoring Plan Content Revisions • Removed data will be collected and maintained by the: • Certificate of Representation form; • Account Certificate of Representation form; and • CAMD Business System. • Reporting requirements for each monitoring system re-certification, maintenance, or other events (RT556) is being moved from the monitoring plan structure to an appropriate quality assurance portion of rule (§75.59)
Monitoring Plan Content Revisions • The following data requirements are being removed: • Fuel Classification for Boiler; • Primary/Secondary control indicator; • Type of fuel associated with each monitoring methodology; • Primary/Secondary methodology indicator; and • Appendix E NOx Correlation Curve Segment Data.
Monitoring Plan Content Revisions • These following requirements will be revised as follows: • Component Status: replaced with Component Activation and Deactivation date/hour to better track the updates to monitoring components; • Formula Status: replaced with Formula Activation and Deactivation date/hour to track formula updates; • Submission Status of Fuel Flowmeter: replaced with Activation and Deactivation date/hour as appropriate.
Monitoring Plan Content Revisions • New monitoring plan data requirements will include: • For dual range monitoring components, the value at which the component switches from the normal to the secondary scale (usually low to high); • Indicator for non-load based units; • Indicator of exemption from 3-load flow RATA requirement; • For each monitoring location, a stack/duct shape code, material code, and duct indicator.
Monitoring Plan Content Revisions • The monitoring component type code will be simplified into the following three codes: • Component type code (CO2, SO2, NOx, etc.); • Analyzer range code (H, L, A); • Moisture measurement basis code (wet or dry).
Other Issues - Optional Records • We would especially like feedback on the following “other” issues: • We are proposing to not collect the following optional data in the new XML reporting format: • Total SO2 mass emissions for the hour (current RT305, column 35); • Total CO2 mass emissions for the hour (current RT330, Column 33); • NOX mass emission rate during unit operation (current RT328, Column 22); • Do sources still want/need RT550 to report reasons for monitoring system downtime?
Other Issues • Change the Total NOX mass emissions for the hour (lb) (current RT328, Column 32) to a Hourly NOX mass emission rate (lb/hr) to be consistent with the reporting requirements for SO2 and CO2. • Report the Diluent Cap value in the data stream • Simplifies the reporting and calculations when diluent cap is used; • Would require that when the cap value is used, it be used for all calculations in that hour.
More Information • Questions and comments about the ECMPS project? Contact me at (202) 343-9211 or boze.matthew@epa.gov • For more information regarding ECMPS, including the project overview, project schedule, technical information, ECMPS outreach and informational bulletins, go to: http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/business/ecmps/index.html