120 likes | 267 Views
Building New Pathways to Sub-Baccalaureate Credentials: The GPS Model Brian Bosworth, FutureWorks June 19, 2013. futureworks | Fellowship for Regional Sustainable Development. Let’s Begin With Some Numbers : National Completion Rates Sub-Baccalaureate Institutions, Public & Private.
E N D
Building New Pathways to Sub-Baccalaureate Credentials: The GPS Model Brian Bosworth, FutureWorks June 19, 2013 futureworks | Fellowship for Regional Sustainable Development
Let’s Begin With Some Numbers:National Completion RatesSub-Baccalaureate Institutions, Public & Private Public, Degree Granting 2-Year (1,010) • Completers within 150% of Time 20.5% • Completers within 200% of Time 26.7% Public, Non-Degree 1 & 2-Year (362) • Completers within 150% of Time 68.0% • Completers within 200% of Time 73.0% Private, For-Profit, Degree-Granting 2-year (645) • Completers within 150% of time 58.5% • Completers within 200% of time 61.9% Private, For-Profit Non-Degree 1 & 2-Year (1,873) • Completers within 150% of time 66.3% • Completers within 200% of time 69.3% Source: IPEDS, 2010 Data
What’s Behind These Low Rates of Success? • Low completion rates reflect our adherence to a traditional academic structure that is not suited to the real needs of the non-traditional students we serve. • Traditional structure asks them to devote time they do not have, make choices for which they are not prepared, and accept complexity and uncertainly when they need simplicity and predictability. • Within this traditional academic structure, it simply takes too long to get the credential that permits transfer into a bachelor’s program or pays off in the labor market.
Traditional Approaches Might Work for Some, Won’t Work for Most • Piecing together a coherent academic pathway to a credential from an array of apparently unconnected individual courses scheduled in small chunks over 16-week semesters. • This may work some of the time for traditional students with lots of time, good preparation, and strong navigational skills or access to them. • It seldom works for typical community college students who are often not well-prepared, sometimes face severe and immediate financial pressures, frequently have family responsibilities. • These students seldom have academic advisors or non-academic supports to help guide them through the multiple choices required by conventionally complex academic systems.
Time Is the Enemy • Most community college students respond to these scheduling challenges by slowing way down – attending only part-time, trying to squeeze in one or at most two courses each semester and occasionally stopping out for a full semester. • At this pace, the pathway to a credential is long and choppy; things go wrong and most students drop away before getting any credential. Time is the enemy of completion. This is costly and inefficient – for the students and the state.
GPS Not A Silver Bullet, But… • We can’t just continue doing what we are doing – the cost is too great. • Small changes around the edges are not making a difference • For community colleges, guided pathways with structured programs can make an enormous difference. • The challenge is scale and scope.
Image GPS at Scale:NSC Data Nationally in 2006: • 990,027 students enrolled for the first time at a public 2-year college; 306,330 received any sort of credential in 6 years • But if only 50% of these were brought to full-time enrollment intensity (double the national average) • And if they completed at a rate of 52.6% (the national average for full-time students) and the other half completed at the rate of 33.2% (the national average for mixed enrollment intensity students)….
Results? • A total of 424,129 of the entering cohort would have completed. • That represents 117,799 more than the 306,330 actual completions for 2006 fall entering students • That’s a gain of almost 40%.
Imagine Higher Rates of Enrollment Intensity • If 50% of all entering students were brought to full-time enrollment intensity , • And the completion rate for full-time students were 68.8% (the average of the five leading states – IL, ND, SD, TN, and MN) …. • And 44.2% for mixed enrollment intensity students (the average of the five leading states – KY, MN, ND, VA and FL)….
Results? • A total of 559,358 of the entering cohort would have completed. • That represents 253,028 more than the 306,330 actual completions for 2006 fall entering students • That’s a gain of 82%.
That’s the Promise of GPS at Scale • If we create guided pathways that allow many more students to pursue credentials at a much faster pace, • We could literally double the numbers of completers.