1 / 16

Key words

Improving cooperation and quality in deliveries from Primary statistics (PS) to National Accounts (NA) Roger Pettersson Statistics Sweden. Key words. NA= National Accounts PS= Primary statistics RI= Right Input = Team at NA SLA= Service Level Agreements Quality Evaluation form.

lucius
Download Presentation

Key words

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Improving cooperation and quality in deliveries from Primary statistics (PS) to National Accounts (NA) Roger Pettersson Statistics Sweden

  2. Key words • NA= National Accounts • PS= Primary statistics • RI= Right Input = Team at NA • SLA= Service Level Agreements • Quality Evaluation form

  3. Roger P NR/SES Roger P NR/SES

  4. Aim • Reliable and user-oriented NA-statistics • Quality declarations of PS for NA’s needs • Improvements if shortcomings • Investigations if something is unclear • Adapted structure of the delivered data • Information describing the delivered data This should be regulated in SLA’s between NA and PS

  5. Right Input • Task: Develop and preserve methods and tools for communication and cooperation between NA and PS • Give guiding principles for the work • Supporting those involved • Storing documents • Monitoring the process • Follow up and evaluation meetings • Suggesting products and timetables

  6. Process • A series of activities that work up a product • Repeated several times in a similar way. • A distinctly defined start and end • Always has an internal or external customer

  7. Statistics production process Evaluate and feedback 8 Specify needs 1 Design and plan 2 Build and test 3 Collect 4 Process 5 Analyse 6 Disseminate and communicate 7 Support and infrastructure

  8. Mission statement • Data in an adapted structure to NA • Agreed quality in all quality dimensions • Content and quality shall be sufficient for • users’ application of the NA statistics • Discrepancies between NA and PS figures • regardingcomparability and coherence are • explained upon publication • Well developed cooperation • NA and PS Heads must give priority to the work

  9. Support to the SLAprocess • Guidelines for the SLAwork • Quality Evaluation Form • Checklist for SLAmeetings(quality meetings) • Yearly document of planned deliveries • Form for SLA • Checklist for follow-up meetings • Mailbox *Right Input

  10. Components in the Quality evaluation form 1 • Information that identifies the source and the part(s) of NAcalculation • 16 components about • Population and sampling • Sampling uncertainty • Measurement error and problems • Estimation and processing errors • Summary evaluation of the components above • Documentation

  11. Components in the Quality evaluation form 2 • Revision policy • Knowledge exchange • Preserving Secrecy - publishing level • Timeliness • Quarterly/Yearly data • Previous SLA • Quality change made over time • Cooperation between different • Primary statistics • Report on differences between • Primary statistics and NA

  12. Quality information – deliveries from PS to NA 1 • General information (every year) • Information about population • Changed content of variables, changed definitions, time series break? • Sampling and sample handling

  13. Quality information – deliveries from PS to NA 2 • Information at deliveries • General information (at deliveries) • Break in time series • Changes in samples • Non-response • Random errors • Measurement problems • Estimates • Explanation of big changes • Description of tables

  14. Evaluation of the job • NA and PS have follow-up meetings about content in the SLA and the process • RI and those at NAdepartmentresponsible for the SLA have a yearly follow-up meeting about the process • RI and the heads for NAunitshave follow-up meetings • The result of the job is presented for the internal council for NA

More Related