1 / 66

An aerodrome operator’s experience

An aerodrome operator’s experience. ERRSS Amsterdam, March 8, 2012. Jan Smeitink , Chairman RST Amsterdam Schiphol Airport. Key element: multi sectorial team composition. Amsterdam Airport Schiphol Chairman Secretary Dutch ATC Major carriers operating to and from Schiphol

lucky
Download Presentation

An aerodrome operator’s experience

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. An aerodrome operator’s experience ERRSS Amsterdam, March 8, 2012 Jan Smeitink, Chairman RST Amsterdam Schiphol Airport

  2. Key element: multi sectorial team composition Amsterdam Airport Schiphol Chairman Secretary Dutch ATC Major carriers operating to and from Schiphol Ground handlers Representatives from Dutch ALPA & Dutch ATC Guild CAA delegates (with observer status)

  3. Schiphol: Complex layout Specific vulnerabilities More prone to incursions than excursions

  4. Role and achievements of RST Schiphol • Newlydefinedrunwayincursiondefinition paper • Guidelineswithregardto risk category rating • In line with EAPPRI 2.0 • Availableforallto share • RunwayIncursionAlerting System Schiphol • Continuouslyactive on allrunways

  5. RIASS continuously monitorsallrunways

  6. landing scenario

  7. A B landing scenario

  8. A B landing scenario

  9. A B landing scenario

  10. A B landing scenario A claims first part of the runway

  11. A B landing scenario A claims first part of the runway

  12. A B landing scenario A claims first part of the runway

  13. A B landing scenario A claims first part of the runway

  14. A B landing scenario A claims first part of the runway

  15. A B landing scenario A claims additional part of the runway

  16. A B landing scenario A claims additional part of the runway

  17. A B landing scenario A claims additional part of the runway

  18. A B landing scenario A claims additional part of the runway

  19. A B landing scenario A claims additional part of the runway

  20. A B landing scenario A claims additional part of the runway

  21. A B landing scenario

  22. A B landing scenario

  23. A B landing scenario

  24. A B landing scenario

  25. A B landing scenario

  26. A B landing scenario

  27. A B landing scenario

  28. A B landing scenario

  29. A B landing scenario

  30. A B landing scenario

  31. A B landing scenario Behind landing traffic, claim is withdrawn

  32. A landing scenario B Behind landing traffic, claim is withdrawn

  33. A B landing scenario Behind landing traffic, claim is withdrawn

  34. A B landing scenario Behind landing traffic, claim is withdrawn

  35. A B landing scenario Behind landing traffic, claim is withdrawn

  36. A B landing scenario

  37. A B landing scenario

  38. A landing scenario B All claims are cancelled upon reaching taxi speed

  39. A landing scenario B All claims are cancelled upon reaching taxi speed

  40. A landing scenario B All claims are cancelled upon reaching taxi speed

  41. B landing scenario A All claims are cancelled upon reaching taxi speed

  42. B landing scenario A All claims are cancelled upon reaching taxi speed

  43. B landing scenario A All claims are cancelled upon reaching taxi speed

  44. B landing scenario A All claims are cancelled upon reaching taxi speed

  45. B landing scenario A All claims are cancelled upon reaching taxi speed

  46. B landing scenario A

  47. A B landing scenario

  48. A B landing scenario

  49. Landing scenario withincursion

More Related