290 likes | 428 Views
Minimizing Energy Consumption with Probabilistic Distance Distributions in Wireless Sensor Networks. Authors: Yanyan Zhuang, Jianping Pan, Lin Cai University of Victoria. Problem:. Prolong lifetime of wireless sensor network → Minimize energy cost in wireless sensor network →
E N D
Minimizing Energy Consumption with Probabilistic Distance Distributions in Wireless Sensor Networks Authors: Yanyan Zhuang, Jianping Pan, Lin Cai University of Victoria
Problem: • Prolong lifetime of wireless sensor network • → • Minimize energy cost in wireless sensor network • → • The main part of energy cost in wireless sensor network is cost by sensor communication
Problem: • How to minimum communication cost in wireless sensor network • → • How to measure energy cost by sensor communication
Solution • Grid-based clustering model • Calculating average distance between two communicating sensors • Advantage: • Simple and feasible
Advantage of the grid-based model • “Once the grid structure is established nodes can communicate locally with their grid head and reach the data processing center, or the sink node, through neighbor grids.”
Disadvantage of average distance • Disregard the super-linear path loss exponent of over-the-air wireless transmissions. • Existed models disregard the path loss of wireless communication signals.
Path loss • When radiowave transmitted in space, it will be absorbed or diffracted and causes propagation loss.
Path loss is a major component in the analysis and design of telecommunication system. • → • Energy cost obtained from average distance between two sensors is not accurate • → • Find a more accurate calculation model
Key point • Reflect path loss on communication distance
background • Clustering scheme • Equal-divided grid clustering • Variable size clustering
Distance distribution model • Based on geometric properties of grid-based clustering • Three steps
Step 1 • Classify transceiver locations for a wireless transmission • (1)two random nodes in the same grid • (2)two random nodes in diagonal neighbor grids • (3)two random nodes in parallel neighbor grids
Step 2 • Find coordinate distribution of those nodes in the three cases by the Heaviside Step Function on unit square grids. • Step function:
Unit step function • The Heaviside step function, H, also called the unit step function, is a discontinuous function whose value is zero for negative argument and one for positive argument. It seldom matters what value is used for H(0), since H is mostly used as a distribution.
Dirac delta function • a 'function' δ(x) that has the value zero everywhere except at x = 0 where its value is infinitely large in such a way that its total integral is 1.
Step 3 • Apply coordinate distribution on the distance calculating formula • to obtain distance distribution in three cases
Simulation • (1)distance verification • Compare results of their distance distribution function to the output of cumulative distribution function
Simplify integral calculation • Use high-degree polynomial functions by Least Squares Fitting to approximate the distribution functions.
Simulation • (2)compare one-hop energy cost • Result: error of energy calculation of average distance model will increase exponentially as the path loss exponent grows
Simulation • (3) compare network energy cost of “simulation” , distance distribution model and average distance model with varied grid length. • Result: there is an optimal grid size
Grid size • The closer to the sink the smaller of the cluster • Heavy load of traffic • Sensors around the sink consume much more energy than sensors located far from the sink in the same time duration
Conclusion • Traditional energy cost calculating model based on average communication distance between two sensors in grid-based sensor network can not reflect the accurate value for out of consideration of path loss • Distance distribution model is more accurate and useful in finding a suitable grid length to further optimize energy efficiency