150 likes | 331 Views
BTS Audit 2010+2011+ Quality standards. Dr Adam Hill Royal Infirmary and University of Edinburgh. Audits. 2010 Audit. 2011 Audit. Secondary care audit 1 Oct 2010-31 Nov 2010 1,501 Records 60% Female Mean age 66 + 15 years.
E N D
BTS Audit 2010+2011+ Quality standards Dr Adam Hill Royal Infirmary and University of Edinburgh
Audits 2010 Audit 2011 Audit • Secondary care audit 1 Oct 2010-31 Nov 2010 • 1,501 Records • 60% Female • Mean age 66 + 15 years • Secondary care audit 1Oct 2011-31 Nov 2011 • 2,404 • 62% Female • Mean age 64 + 16 years
Patients should have record of cough, sputum purulence, estimated or measured 24hr sputum volume and breathlessness when clinically stable 2010 2011 %
Patients should have treatable causes excluded 2010 2011 %
Patients should have spirometryAnnual spirometry if attending secondary careSpirometry before and after IV antibiotic therapy and LT antibiotic therapy 2010 2011 • 60% spirometry on day appt [others 6m (3-13)] • 16% IV Abs past year • Of which 22% had spirometry pre and post IVs • 10% long term Neb Abs • Of which 63% had spirometry pre and post • 55% spirometry on day appt [others 6m (3-13)] • 17% IV Abs past year • Of which 22% had spirometry pre and post IVs • 10% long term Neb Abs • Of which 61% had spirometry pre and post
Long term treatments 2010 2011 • 66% SA B2 agonist and 11% SA anticholinergic • 65% SA B2 agonist and 29% SA anticholinergic • 81% ICS [median dose 1252 (70) BDP] • 27% Carbocysteine and 6% Neb saline (38% 0.9% saline) • No mannitol or DNAse • 27% LT oral Abs and 9% Neb Abs (76% colomycin) • 67% SA B2 agonist and 9% SA anticholinergic • 62% SA B2 agonist and 30% SA anticholinergic • 78% ICS [median dose 1094 (679) BDP] • 30% Carbocysteine and 8% Neb saline (37% 0.9% saline) • 0.4% mannitol + 0.2% DNAse • 33% LT oral Abs and 10% Neb Abs (76% colomycin)
Patients with an exacerbation should have a sputum sample sent for microbiological culture prior to empirical AbTx
Pulmonary rehab should be offered if dyspnoea affecting ADL 2010 2011 • 54% Not applicable • 13% No data • 12% Referred • 17% Not referred • 5% Unable to participate • 52% Not applicable • 16% No data • 15% Referred • 13% Not referred • 5% Unable to participate
BTS Guidelines Thorax 2010;65(1):1-58Quality standards for clinically significant Bx in adults. July 201211 Quality Standards • Ensuring diagnostic accuracy with confirmation of a clinical diagnosis of Bx with a CT of the chest using 1mm slices. • Why important ? Population poorly defined in primary care; Underdiagnosis in primary + secondary care e.g. Severe asthma and COPD. • To investigate for specific treatable causes (ABPA, CVID and cystic fibrosis) • Why important ? These have specific treatments that differ from standard bronchiectasis management, which may alter the prognosis . • Regular chest clearance techniques to be taught by a specialist respiratory physiotherapist and advised of the frequency and duration with which these should be carried out. • Why important ? This is a key treatment to alleviate symptoms and may reduce chest infections.
BTS Guidelines Thorax 2010;65(1):1-58Quality standards for clinically significant Bx in adults. July 2012 • Pulmonary rehabilitation to be provided in those with significant breathlessness. • Why important ? To improve patients exercise capacity and health status. • To monitor sputum bacteriology both in stability and exacerbations. • Why important ? Guide antibiotic therapy and management and improve the assessment and follow up. • Assess patients before and after intravenous antibiotic therapy. • Why important ? Allow the patient and clinicians to objectively assess the response and may guide long term management.
BTS Guidelines Thorax 2010;65(1):1-58Quality standards for clinically significant Bx in adults. July 2012 • Suitable patients to have an available inhaled antibiotic service. • Why important ? Long term prophylactic treatment may improve symptoms and reduce the number of chest infections. • Domiciliary intravenous antibiotic treatment made available for chest infections in selected patients to reduce the need for hospitalisation. • Why important ? This will reduce hospital bed days and the risk of hospital acquired infection and promote people centred care allowing delivery of intravenous treatment safely at home.
BTS Guidelines Thorax 2010;65(1):1-58Quality standards for clinically significant Bx in adults. July 2012 • All patients should have a self-management plan. • Why important ? This will allow people with bronchiectasis to manage their condition and to recognise, respond to and reduce the occurrence of chest infections; • Secondary care follow up as per British Thoracic Society national guidelines. • Why important ? The clinical course and management in such people is complicated and management would be better under a multidisciplinary team led by a Respiratory physician.
BTS Audit 2012 • In progress • Based on Quality Standards • BTS Guidelines Thorax 2010;65(1):1-58 • BTS Audit Thorax. 2012 Oct;67(10):928-930. • Self management plan + BTS QS- BTS website