300 likes | 469 Views
Animal Spirits, Persistent Unemployment and the Belief Function. Duke University, February 2011 Roger E A Farmer Department of Economics UCLA. Main Question. Is the economy self-correcting? Yes Classical economics New-Keynesian economics No Keynes of the General Theory
E N D
Animal Spirits, Persistent Unemployment and the Belief Function Duke University, February 2011 Roger E A Farmer Department of Economics UCLA
Main Question • Is the economy self-correcting? • Yes • Classical economics • New-Keynesian economics • No • Keynes of the General Theory • Old-Keynesian economics
The Goals of This Research • Replace New-Keynesian Economics • Why? • Degree of price stickiness is inconsistent with micro evidence • Cannot explain inflation persistence • There is no unemployment in the canonical model • Welfare costs of business cycles are trivial • Cannot explain asset price bubbles • Alternative: Old Keynesian economics
Main Idea • Put in a search model of the labor market • Drop the Nash bargain • Replace the Nash bargain with demand determination of output through self-fulfilling expectations • Costly Search and Recruiting • Externality supports different allocations as equilibria • Animal spirits select an equilibrium
Connection with New-Keynesian Theory • New Keynesian economics assumes sticky prices. Deviations from the natural rate of unemployment are temporary. • Old Keynesian economics assumes flexible prices. There is a continuum of steady state unemployment rates indexed by beliefs.
Connection with Search Theory • Two kinds of multiplicity in search models • Finite multiplicities: Diamond 1982,1984 • Steady state Continuum: Howitt and McAfee 1987 • Continuum follows from bilateral monopoly
A Model • One Lucas tree – non reproducible • One good produced by labor and capital • No disutility of work – everyone wants a job • Everyone fired and rehired every period • No uncertainty
The Labor Market • Finding a job uses resources • Two technologies • Production technology • Matching technology
Terminology Number of trees (Normalized to 1) Time endowment of household (Normalized to 1) Consumption in units of commodities Output in units of commodities
Terminology Money wage Money rental rate Relative price of a tree Money price of a commodity
Terminology Employment Production workers Recruiters
Technologies Production technology Match technology
Planning Problem y L* U* X* V* L L* 1
Decentralizing • Need headhunting firms • Pay unemployed workers • Pay corporate recruiters • Sell matches • We don’t see these markets
More Terminology Probability of a worker being hired One recruiter hires this many workers
Decentralization • Agents take wages and prices as given • Households take hiring probability as given • Firms take hiring effectiveness as given • All markets clear
Firm’s Problem Firm acts like a firm in an auction market but takes q as given q is an externality that represents market tightness. For any given q there is a zero profit equilibrium
Market Tightness • q is an indicator of market tightness • For every value of q there is a different zero profit equilibrium
Comparison with the Classical Model Classical Old Keynesian
The Production Function, Aggregate Supply and Demand Commodities c Dollars (wage units) C Labor Labor Aggregate Supply Production Function
Data Used in This Study I use the output gap instead of unemployment for more direct comparison with new-Keynesian literature
Augmented Dickey-Fuller Tests for a Unit Root in Individual Series Even after taking out a linear trend -- gdp is still extremely persistent. We cannot reject the hypothesis of a unit root in deviations of gdp from trend.
Estimation • I estimated both models with MCMC in Dynare • For each model I ran 150,000 replications
Why? • In the data GDP, the interest rate and inflation are well described by a cointegrated VAR • NK and OK -- fit is close BUT NK must assume NR is a random walk
Conclusion • In the old-Keynesian model the economy drifts like a boat on the ocean • An interest rate policy rule, like the Taylor rule, pushes the boat in one direction or another. • Open question • Is it better to target the level of the pricing kernel rather than its rate of change?