220 likes | 423 Views
Is ultrasound foam sclerotherapy contraindicated in patients with migraine ?. By Claudine HAMEL-DESNOS, Caen, France. Should we treat varicose veins using UGFS* in patients with migraine?. Meier B et al. Eur Heart J 2012;33:705-713. Foam. Patent foramen ovale. MIGRAINE. *Abbreviations:
E N D
Is ultrasound foam sclerotherapycontraindicated in patients with migraine? By Claudine HAMEL-DESNOS, Caen, France
Should we treat varicose veins using UGFS* in patients with migraine? Meier B et al. Eur Heart J 2012;33:705-713 Foam Patentforamen ovale MIGRAINE *Abbreviations: PFO, patent foramen ovale; UGFS, ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy Neurological disturbances?
« The results of NOMAS can be seen as the strongest evidence against an association between migraine or migraine with aura and PFO » Kurth K, Tzourio C, and Bousser MG. Editorial
How does foam progress? • In vitro,2 ml of 3% sodium tetradecyl sulphate are deactivated by only 1 ml of blood in a short period of time (15 s) • The sclerosing agent does not reach the brain circulation • Only “bubbles” remain Watkins M.R. Deactivation of sodium tetradecyl sulphate injection by blood proteins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41:521-525.
Neurological disturbances • Visual (1.4%) • Migraine (4.2%) • Transient ischemic attacks • Stroke Mostly case reports Good recovery Jia X, Mowatt G, Burr JM, Cassar K, Cook J, Fraser C. Systematic review of foam sclerotherapy for varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2007;94(8):925-936.
The International Headache Societymigraine without aura: diagnostic criteria • At least 5 attacks fulfilling criteria B-D • Headache attacks lasting 4-72 hours (untreated or unsuccessfully treated) • At least two of the following characteristics: • Unilateral location • Pulsating quality • Moderate or severe pain intensity • Aggravation by or causing avoidance of routine physical activity (eg walking or climbing stairs) • At least one of the following symptoms: • Nausea and/or vomiting • Photophobia and phonophobia • Not attributed to another disorder The International Classification of Headache Disorders. Cephalalgia. 2004;24:S9-S160.
The International Headache Societymigraine with aura : diagnostic criteria • At least 2 attacks fulfilling criteria B-D • Aura consisting of at least 1 of the following, but no motor weakness: • fully reversible visual symptoms including positive features (eg, flickering lights, spots, or lines) and/or negative features (i.e, loss of vision); • fully reversible sensory symptoms including positive features (i.e, pins and needles) and/or negative features (i.e, numbness); • fully reversible dysphasic speech disturbance • At least 2 of the following : • homonymous visual symptoms and/or unilateral sensory symptoms • at least 1 aura symptom develops gradually over ≥5 min and/or diferent aura symptoms occur in succession over ≥5 min • each symptom lasts >5 and <60 minutes • Headache fulfilling criteria B-D for migraine without aura begins during the aura or follows the aura within 60 minutes • Not attributed to another disorder The International Classification of Headache Disorders. Cephalalgia. 2004;24:S9-S160.
Pathophysiology of migraine associated with Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy (UGFS)
Pathophysiology of migraine with aura (AM) Extensive cortical depression (propagated): Depolarization wave from the occipital cortex to the forehead (may be limited): • occipital = visual troubles • parietal = paresthesias • frontal = speech troubles Endothelin-1 (powerful vasoconstrictor) = triggers AM
Endothelin and foam Visual disturbances= AM Varicose vein endothelium is damaged by foam and releases endothelin-1, which reaches the cerebral cortex via the PFO, triggering an aura. Visual disturbances are not transient ischemic attacks Foam →release of endothelin-1 Gillet et al. Phlebology. 2010;25:261-266. Frullini et al. Phlebology. 2011;26:203-208.
According to expert recommendations: MIGRAINE WITH OR WITHOUT AURA IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION FOR UGFS
Breu FX, Guggenbichler S, Wollmann JC. 2nd European consensus meeting on foam sclerotherapy 2006. Tegernsee, Germany: Vasa 2008;S/713-729. Berridge D, Lees T, Earnshaw JJ. The VEnous Intervention (VEIN) project. Phlebology. 2009;24 (suppl 1):1-2.
1023 articles analyzed • 41 articles retained reporting the presence of stroke, transient ischemic attacks (TIA) or visual or speech disturbances, migraine, cephalalgia (63% foam and 37% liquid) • 12 cases of stroke • 9 TIAs • 29 cases of migraine (0.27%) No personal history of migraine described Sarvananthan T, Sheperd AC, Willenberg T, Davis AH. Neurological complications of sclerotherapy for varicose veins. J Vasc Surg . 2012;55:243-251.
There are insufficient data to determine the role of: • The technique used to generate foam, • The gas used, • The volumes injected, • The type of veins treated, • The different types of measures taken to avoid complications
« The pathologic mechanisms resulting in CVA are likely to be different to those leading to migraine and visual disturbances » • « Precautions should be exercised particularly in patients with a known PFO and perhaps those known to suffer from migraine » Sarvananthan T, Sheperd AC, Willenberg T, Davis AH. Neurological complications of sclerotherapy for varicose veins. J Vasc Surg 2012; 55:243-251.
PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS A symptomatic PFO is a contraindication for UGFS A personal history of migraine is not a contraindication for UGFS. However, it must be reported along with the presence or absence of aura Should migraine with/without aura occur after UGFS: • Treat the patient with his/her usual antimigraine treatment (or with NSAI) • In case of VDs, do not let the patient drive unaccompanied until the cessation of disturbances • The risk/benefit ratio should be reviewed before continuing sclerotherapy treatment (preventative antimigraine treatment?) • In case of stroke: assessment (Doppler examination of the supra-aortic vessels, consultation with a neurologist, consultation with a cardiologist, MRI); pharmacovigilance report.
CONCLUSION • Neurological disturbances after UGFS should not be overlooked; however, they are usually AM variants • Strokes are rare side-effects and are not the result of the same underlying mechanisms; no link with a personal history of migraine has been established; stroke diagnosis must be confirmed • Currently, a history of migraine is not a contraindication for UGFS though it may contribute to the development of AM (or AM variant) • Further studies are needed