1 / 34

Evaluation of FTA Drug Abuse Testing Program April 2008

Evaluation of FTA Drug Abuse Testing Program April 2008. Jerry Powers, FTA Office of Program Management – Safety & Security. Evaluation Analysis Opportunities. Use DAMIS data and external cost measures to develop a cost benefit model

lula
Download Presentation

Evaluation of FTA Drug Abuse Testing Program April 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evaluation of FTA Drug Abuse Testing ProgramApril 2008 Jerry Powers, FTA Office of Program Management – Safety & Security

  2. Evaluation Analysis Opportunities • Use DAMIS data and external cost measures to develop a cost benefit model • Compare DAMIS data to SAMIS data to determine safety benefit from the D&A Program • Raise the bar – provide customer service. Opportunities to use DAMIS to help agencies justify D&A expenditure apart from it just being a regulatory requirement • Show where to focus efforts/funding - areas for improvement

  3. CHARTERProve the Effectiveness of the D&A Program in Achieving FTA Strategic Goal • Promoting public safety by eliminating transit-related deaths, injuries, and property damage USE: • Maturing DAMIS data together with: • Safety Data (SAMIS/NTD) • Audits/Technical assistance experience and data • Other Industry and Government D&A measures • Creative analysis

  4. New Measures of Cost and Safety BenefitsMoney, Lives & Mayhem Cost Benefit • Show cost saving to Transit Industry due to elimination or mitigation of D&A using employees • Second chance programs have significant cost benefit to industry • Audits are having a positive effect in terms of safety benefits and cost savings • Use baseline rate (1995 or 1996) and subsequent improvement to prove reduction in accidents, fatalities and injuries Safety Benefit

  5. Outline • Concept and Measures • FTA and Testing Costs • Benefits • Mitigation of Drug & Alcohol positives • Pre-employment • Random • Reasonable Suspicion • Refusals • Post-Accident • Deterrent Effect • Safety • Audits • Second Chance Programs

  6. D&A Evaluation Concept I. COST BENEFIT II. SAFETY BENEFIT Baseline Baseline NTD S&S Data DAMIS Data NTD S&S Data Other Industry and Government D&A Cost Measures DAMIS Data Analysis Analysis Merge these baselines into cost benefit spreadsheet Of D&A Program NTD S&S Data NTD S&S Data Merge these baselines to show D&A contributing to accident avoidance DAMIS Data DAMIS Data Other Industry and Government D&A Cost Measures

  7. Industry and Government D&A Cost Measures

  8. DAMIS Baseline • Random Positives are on the decline • CDL positive rate is higher than other employee categories

  9. NTD S&S Baseline • Transit Industry is getting safer. Incidents, injuries and fatalities are trending down

  10. I. Cost Methodology - Cost Benefit Spreadsheet . . . . . . . . . . . .

  11. Cost Methodology – Unit of Measurement • Each D&A using employee costs the Transit Industry and the overall society $15-20K per year: • Health Care Expenditures • D&A abuse services • Medical consequences • Productivity Effects • Premature Death • Impaired productivity • Institutionalization, Incarceration, Crime careers and victims • Other Effects • Crime effects • Vehicle crashes and fire • D&A Program eliminates or mitigates users at $15-20K per user per year

  12. 2005 $2,200,000 FTA Total Cost per Year - FY2001 309,190 Total Tests 140,179 Total Random and Reasonable Suspicion Drug Tests $66.56 Cost per Test - from 1999 Rural $20,579,686 Actual Cost of Tests $6.08 Safety Sensitive Employee Productivity Cost (per test) $853,410 Total National Productivity Cost to Agencies Cost of Drug & Alcohol Program Personnel at Transit Agencies (per 40.97 Test) $12,667,514 Total National Administrative Cost to Agencies $36,300,611 Total Cost Costs • Costs have ranged from $22M-$36M per year since 1995

  13. Savings Methodology • Transit is 0.14% of the US Gross National Product (approximately $17.4 Billion/year in 2005) • Cost of Drug use and Alcohol misuse to the US economy is $483 Billion per year – NIDA measure indexed • Transit portion of that cost is $677 Million per year. Safety-sensitive are 80% of transit employees. Thus incur $542 Million of that cost. • 10.6% of Transportation Workers with drug use and/or alcohol misuse - Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Survey • Approximately 260,000 safety-sensitive transit employees • Thus, ~27,500 incur the $542 Million in annual cost • $542,000,000/27,500 employees = $19,700 per year per employee in 2005 • Deterring or mitigating those 27,500 employees is the basic savings opportunity

  14. Savings Methodology

  15. Cost MethodologyPre-employment Savings • Pre-employment testing - eliminated 18,125 users over the course of the Program. These users would have cost the Transit Industry $358 Million in 2005 (18,125*$19,753 = ~$358,000,000).

  16. Cost MethodologyRandom Savings • Random testing - eliminated or mitigated 5701 users over the previous 5 years of the program in 2005. These users would have cost the Transit Industry $112 Million in 2005 (5701*$19,753 = ~$112,000,000).

  17. Cost MethodologyPost-Accident, Reasonable Suspicion, and Refusals • Post Accident positives - eliminated or mitigated 1041 users over previous 5 years in 2005. These users would have cost the Transit Industry $21 Million in 2005. • Reasonable Suspicion - eliminated or mitigated 601 over previous 5 years in 2005. These users would have cost the Transit Industry $12 Million in 2005. • Refusals - eliminated 1506 users over previous 5 years in 2005. These users would have cost the Transit Industry $30 Million in 2005.

  18. Deterrent Effect of Random Testing Year to Year calculation – no cumulative effect If the positive rate remained the same as at the beginning of the program, each year there would be ~2000 more positives per year Random Positive Rate

  19. Deterrence – Random Program • Has saved a total of $347 Million 1995-2005 • From $9M to up to $56M per year

  20. Cost Methodology • Drug and Alcohol Rules Cost Benefit (Regulatory Impact Analysis) called for a $1.39 Billion benefit over 10 years. An average of $139 million/year. • Real data from the first 11 years blows this figure away • $3.683 Billion (or $335 million per year average) Redskins 27 Cowboys 14 It’s Up and…. It’s Good!

  21. Safety Methodology - D&A Accidents are Comparable with Regular Accidents in Lethality • SAMIS shows and .0071 fatalities per Accident (Collision) 1995 – 1998. • DAMIS shows .0077 fatalities per D&A Accident. • Thus, D&A has comparable lethality to Overall Safety figures in fatal accidents (8% higher than non-D&A accidents). • Fatalities are a function of accidents – bad luck when they occur

  22. Safety Methodology - Show that D&A Program Saves Lives and Reduces Injuries • D&A Program Reduces Accidents and thus, exposure to Injuries and Fatalities • No way of measuring the D&A related accident rate before the program, so… • Use 1995 as a baseline

  23. Saving Lives: It’s What’s above the Curve Post-Accident Positive Rate (Drug and Alcohol) Per Incident • Using 1995 as a baseline, • the dark wedge represents: • 1690 Accidents • 13 Fatalities • 1486 Injuries Post Accident Positive Rate

  24. Safety Methodology -Less Accidents = Less Mayhem • DAMIS showed that 3.1% accidents were D&A related in 1995 (Baseline) • DAMIS showed that 1.5% accidents were D&A related in 2005 (Improvement) • If the rate had remained at 3.1%, 1690 more accidents would have resulted from 1996-2005. • National Transit Database (NTD) Safety & Security module reveals that .0071 fatalities result per accident (collisions, vehicle going off road, and derailments) • At an overall DAMIS rate of .0077 fatalities per accident, these 817 accidents would be expected to cause 13.02 fatalities.

  25. The FTA Drug & Alcohol Testing Program The decrease in illicit drug use in the transit industry has resulted in the positive rate dropping from 1.76% to 0.81% resulting in: • An avoidance of 1,690 accidents that would have produced approximately 13 fatalities and 1486 injuries. • The elimination or mitigation through rehabilitation of 29,841 illicit drug users in the transit industry through both testing and deterrence 3.       Productivity benefits and total societal economic cost avoidance of $3.68 billion dollars

  26. Training Cost for New Employees • Transit employee salary – weighted average from 2000 Bureau of Labor Statistics

  27. Cost Measures - Is Return-to-duty and Follow-up a Benefit or a Burden? • It is estimated that to train new employee, it costs 1/3rd of an employee’s annual salary • $1650 per month – D&A Using employee D&A Abusing Employee Costs Training Costs for New Employees

  28. Second Chance Programs Return to Duty and Follow-up totals 25,624 Return-to-Duty Tests (Both Drugs & Alcohol) 175,247 Follow-up Tests (Both Drugs & Alcohol) 475 Positives - Failed Return-to-Duty Tests (Both Drugs & Alcohol) 2300 Positives - Failed Follow-up Tests (Both Drugs & Alcohol) 10.06% Percent Positives per Return-to-Duty Employee 1995-2005 6.53 Follow-up tests per RTD employee 1995-2005 Average Transit Salary - 2000 $223,254,981 Savings through the Avoidance of Training Costs Societal Economic Cost of Employing a Drug User or Alcohol Misuser (2 months or 1/6 of Average Annual Economic Impact of Each Drug & Alcohol Using Transit Employee) $7,571,542 Cost of Additional Testing - Return-to-Duty and Follow-up (assume $70/test because of Urban focus) $14,060,970 $24,599,040 Substance Abuse Professional (SAP) Cost (assume $960/ RTD Emp.) $177,023,429 Net (Savings minus Costs) - Second Chance Programs Is Second Chance Policy Beneficial to Industry? YES $28,970.32 • Benefit is almost 5 times more than the cost ($223M saved in training vs. $46M in costs), or for every dollar spent on Second Chance, industry got almost $5 dollars back.

  29. Cost Measures - Audits • Expect a hump in Random positive rate after audit as testing gets better – random becomes more random. • And systems are generally brought into compliance • Good examples: Los Angeles, San Jose, Santa Fe OR • Random rate decreases as agency relaxes after audit OR • They go up the year of as agency readies for the audit

  30. Audits • Expected result of Audits - Timeline Goes up as result of better testing (catch more users) Audit Lower as result of eliminating abusers and causing abstinence

  31. Actual Audit Effect • Drop in the right of the chart shows that audits are effective in discouraging and eliminating substance abusers • Audit cost is ~$25K. One user mitigated over one year saves ~$20K

  32. Trends: Drug Metabolization Time and Positive Rates shows Actual Drug Choices • Program would seem to be pushing users away from THC (45 days to leave the system) and towards Cocaine (3 days to leave the system) • Expect that tests catch actual THC users at a rate 15 times higher than that of actual Cocaine users • Multiplying Cocaine rate by 15 gives equivalent actual comparable usage rate • Data shows that Cocaine use is 10 to 12 times higher than THC use

  33. Actual Usage Comparison If Cocaine was testable out to 45 days – the chart would look like This.

  34. Questions & Answers Jerry Powers will be available for questions immediately following this presentation Room 209-210

More Related