500 likes | 525 Views
FEMA Update. Updates on various FEMA Preparedness and other Agency programs and initiatives. Partners in Emergency Preparedness Conference April 14, 2009. Patrick Massey. Federal Preparedness Coordinator. Director, National Preparedness Division. FEMA Region 10. Presentation Topics.
E N D
FEMA Update Updates on various FEMA Preparedness and other Agency programs and initiatives Partners in Emergency Preparedness Conference April 14, 2009 Patrick Massey Federal Preparedness Coordinator Director, National Preparedness Division FEMA Region 10
Presentation Topics • Overview of FEMA Nationally • Overview of FEMA Region 10 • Preparedness IV. Hazard Mitigation V. Grants Programs VI. Disaster Operations VII. Disaster Assistance • Assessments • Planning • NIMS • Training • Exercises • Continuity Programs • Community Preparedness
I. Overview of FEMA Prepared. Responsive. Committed.
FEMA Mission Lead Nation’s Efforts to: • Prepare for, • Protect against, • Rapidly respond to, and • Recover from disaster. • Mitigate risk. All Hazards: • Natural disasters • Terrorism • Other man-made disasters
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Office of the Administrator Acting Administrator– Nancy Ward Acting Deputy Administrator – David Garratt Office of Policy and Prog. Analysis Director Pat Stahlschmidt Acting Office of External Affairs Director Robert Jensen Acting Associate Deputy Administrator Bob Shea Gulf Coast Recovery Assistant Administrator James Stark Law Enforcement Advisor to the Administrator Rick Dinse Center for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives Director Carole Cameron Acting Executive Secretariat Exec. Secretary Elizabeth Edge Regional Administrators Region I - Paul Ford, Acting Region II - Mike Moriarty, Acting Region III – Jon Sarubbi Region IV - Major P. May Region V - Janet Odeshoo, Acting Region VI – Gary Jones, Acting Region VII – Art Freeman, Acting Region VIII –Doug Gore, Acting Region IX – Karen Armes, Acting Region X – Denis Hunsinger, Acting National Capital Region Coordination Director Ken Wall Acting Disability Coordinator Cindy Daniel Office of Chief Financial Officer Norman Dong Management Assistant Administrator Albert Sligh Office of Equal Rights Director Pauline Campbell Office of Chief Counsel David Trissell Logistics Management Assistant Administrator William “Eric” Smith Disaster Assistance Assistant Administrator James Walke Acting Disaster Operations Assistant Administrator Bob Powers Acting Grant Programs Assistant Administrator Ross Ashley National Preparedness Deputy Administrator Corey Gruber Acting United States Fire Admin Assistant Administrator Denis Onieal Acting National Continuity Programs Assistant Administrator Ann Buckingham Acting Mitigation Assistant Administrator Mike Buckley Acting Dotted Lines are Coordination Solid Lines Are Command and Control Names in Italics are in Acting positions As of 1/21/09
Who is FEMA? 3,000 authorized full-time permanent employees 8,000 on-call disaster assistance employees
New FEMA Vision TRANSFORM FEMA INTO THE NATION’S PREEMINENT EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AND PREPAREDNEDSS AGENCY ▪Marshall an effective national response ▪ Improve delivery of service to victims ▪ Reduce vulnerability to life and property ▪ Strengthen our partnerships with states ▪ Earn public confidence
Operational Core Competencies • Service to Disaster Victims • Operational Planning and Preparedness • Incident Management • Disaster Logistics • Hazard Mitigation • Emergency Communications • Public Disaster Communications • Integrated Preparedness • Continuity Programs
II. FEMA Region 10 Office located in Bothell, WA - “The Bunker” • 90 Full-time staff • 400+ Disaster Reservists • MERS detachment co-located Satellite offices: Hermiston, OR Anchorage, AK Dennis Hunsinger, Acting Regional Administrator
FEMA Region 10 FY09 Goals • Disaster Readiness • Program Delivery • Stakeholder Outreach • Professional Development
III. Preparedness • Assessments • Planning • NIMS • Training • Exercises • Community Preparedness • Continuity Programs
Goal: Implement the Preparedness Cycle CONPLAN, OPLANS Internal, External, T&E Integration RAMP, CAP NIMS / NRF HSEEP, NEP, NIECG The National Preparedness Cycle The National Preparedness Cycle The National Preparedness Cycle EVALUATE & IMPROVE The evaluation and improvement of combined capability to perform assigned missions and tasks to standards necessary to achieve successful outcomes PLAN The collection and analysis of intelligence and information and the development of policies, plans, procedures, mutual aid agreements, strategies, and other publications EVALUATE & IMPROVE The evaluation and improvement of combined capability to perform assigned missions and tasks to standards necessary to achieve successful outcomes PLAN The collection and analysis of intelligence and information and the development of policies, plans, procedures, mutual aid agreements, strategies, and other publications EVALUATE & IMPROVE The evaluation and improvement of combined capability to perform assigned missions and tasks to standards necessary to achieve successful outcomes PLAN The collection and analysis of intelligence and information and the development of policies, plans, procedures, mutual aid agreements, strategies, and other publications EXERCISE The utilization of exercises to demonstrate existing capability to perform assigned missions and tasks ORGANIZE, TRAIN & EQUIP Establishment and maintenance of teams, an organizational structure, leadership, qualified staff, equipment, and relevant training necessary to perform assigned missions & tasks EXERCISE The utilization of exercises to demonstrate existing capability to perform assigned missions and tasks ORGANIZE, TRAIN & EQUIP Establishment and maintenance of teams, an organizational structure, leadership, qualified staff, equipment, and relevant training necessary to perform assigned missions & tasks EXERCISE The utilization of exercises to demonstrate existing capability to perform assigned missions and tasks ORGANIZE, TRAIN & EQUIP Establishment and maintenance of teams, an organizational structure, leadership, qualified staff, equipment, and relevant training necessary to perform assigned missions & tasks
Doctrine development: • Preparedness – National Preparedness Goal (NPG) and Target Capabilities (TCL) • Exercises – National Exercise Program (NEP) • Incident Management – National Incident Management System (NIMS) • Planning – Integrated Planning System (IPS) and Comprehensive Preparedness Guides (CPG)
Assessments • Target Capabilities List (TCL) Update Project • Gap Analysis Program (GAP) • Comprehensive Assessment System (CAS)
The Target Capabilities List (TCLs) Respond Mission Area Common Mission Area • Animal Health Emergency Support • Citizen Evacuation and Shelter-in-Place • Critical Resource Logistics and Distribution • Emergency Operations Center • Management • Emergency Public Information and Warning • Emergency Public Safety and Security • Response • Emergency Triage and Pre-Hospital Treatment • Environmental Health • Explosive Device Response Operations • Fatality Management • Fire Incident Response Support • Isolation and Quarantine • Mass Care (Sheltering, Feeding, and Related Services) • Mass Prophylaxis • Medical Supplies Management and Distribution • Medical Surge • Onsite Incident Management • Responder Safety and Health • Search and Rescue (Land-Based) • Volunteer Management and Donations • WMD/Hazardous Materials Response and • Decontamination • Communications • Community Preparedness and Participation • Intelligence/Information Sharing and • Dissemination • Planning • Risk Management Prevent Mission Area • CBRNE Detection • Counter-Terror Investigations and Law Enforcement • Information Gathering and Recognition • Intelligence Analysis and Production Protect Mission Area • Critical Infrastructure Protection • Epidemiological Surveillance and Investigation • Food and Agriculture Safety and Defense • Laboratory Testing Recovery Mission Area • Economic and Community Recovery • Restoration of Lifelines • Structural Damage Assessment Common Mission Area Respond Mission Area • Communications • Community Preparedness and Participation • Intelligence/Information Sharing and • Dissemination • Planning • Risk Management • Animal Health Emergency Support • Citizen Evacuation and Shelter-in-Place • Critical Resource Logistics and Distribution • Emergency Operations Center • Management • Emergency Public Information and Warning • Emergency Public Safety and Security • Response • Emergency Triage and Pre-Hospital • Treatment • Environmental Health • Explosive Device Response Operations • Fatality Management • Fire Incident Response Support • Isolation and Quarantine • Mass Care (Sheltering, Feeding, and • Related Services) • Mass Prophylaxis • Medical Supplies Management and Distribution • Medical Surge • Onsite Incident Management • Responder Safety and Health • Search and Rescue (Land-Based) • Volunteer Management and Donations • WMD/Hazardous Materials Response and • Decontamination Prevent Mission Area • CBRNE Detection • Counter-Terror Investigations and Law Enforcement • Information Gathering and Recognition • Intelligence Analysis and Production Protect Mission Area • Critical Infrastructure Protection • Epidemiological Surveillance and Investigation • Food and Agriculture Safety and Defense • Laboratory Testing Recovery Mission Area • Economic and Community Recovery • Restoration of Lifelines • Structural Damage Assessment
TCL Update Project • Update content to reflect current policies, guidance, capabilities • Establish ‘frameworks’ that are more user-friendly, especially for TCL application to preparedness decision making • Strengthen the role of a jurisdiction’s unique risks and circumstances • Establish measurable targets for planning and assessment purposes • Provide an objective means to justify investments and priorities • Provide strong links among applicable standards, Federal policies and guidance, and terminologies • Help synchronize administrative and programmatic reporting • Promote mutual aid and resource sharing • Promote integration across programs along the preparedness lifecycle
Impacts from the TCL Update • Individual capabilities will be implemented on a rolling basis as they are developed until the entire TCL is updated • TCL updates will be reflected or referenced within federal preparedness programs (e.g., grant investment justifications, planning guidance, exercise evaluation guides, assessments) • The TCL provides guidance for building and measuring capabilities, it is not meant to prescribe how to perform operations or to be viewed as a standard • Entities are not expected to deliver a capability by itself – rather it is anticipated for capabilities to be met through mutual aid and regional collaboration.
Updated Frameworks Under Development From the original 37 capabilities, the following six (6) are under development to test the means for updating the TCL: • Animal Disease Emergencies • Multi-Agency Coordination/Emergency Operations Center Management • Intelligence • Mass Transit Protection • Incident Command • Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)/Hazardous Materials (HazMat) Rescue • FEMA convened Technical Working Groups comprised of local officials from all Regions of the country to develop the first set of draft Frameworks being circulated for a wider national review
Target Capability Frameworks • A Target Capability Framework comprises three charts: Performance Classes, Performance Objectives, and Resource Elements
Performance Classes: Examples WMD/HazMat Rescue Animal Disease Emergencies
Gap Analysis Program (GAP) GAP Critical Areas: • Transportation and Evacuation • Communications • Temporary Emergency Power • Mass-Care and Emergency Assistance • Logistics Management and Resource Support • Public Health • Search and Rescue The purpose of the FEMA Gap Analysis Program is to engage State, Federal, and other partners in a process that identifies and addresses shortfalls in meeting disaster resource and planning requirements. Gaps are identified by comparing current capabilities to disaster response requirements.
Comprehensive Assessment System (CAS) REQUIREMENTS OUTCOMES Analysis and information that: • Informs the Federal Preparedness Report (FPR), State Preparedness Reports (SPR), and, ultimately, National Preparedness Report (NPR) • Helps set policy requirements and allocate finite resources • Supports the Grant Programs Directorate (GPD) Cost-to-Capability (C2C) Initiative • Guides improvements in training, exercises and operations • Assess compliance with the national preparedness system, National Incident Management System, National Response Plan, and other related plans and strategies (PKEMRA 649 (c)(1)) • Assess capability levels at the time of assessment against target capability levels (PKEMRA 649 (c)(2)) • Assess resource needs to meet desired target capability levels (PKEMRA 649 (c)(3)) • Assess performance of training, exercise, and operations (PKEMRA 649 (c)(4)) “A Comprehensive Assessment System (CAS) that assesses, on an ongoing basis, the Nation’s overall preparedness, including operational readiness.” – PKEMRA 649(a)
EMAC Aid Agreements Data LLIS Grant Reporting Data IJs After Action and Corrective Action Data BISRs FEMA RAMP CAP C2C PKEMRA Reporting Requirements FPR CAS FYHSP Exercise Data CRR SPR NEXS Training Data GAP DPETAP NIMS DATA Existing and Legacy Assessment Data CSID TICP CTGP PCA TEI NPS EMI - TAIS EMAP Preparedness Standards Data
National Response Framework (NRF) www.fema.gov/nrf Doctrine, organization, roles and responsibilities, response actions and planning requirements that guide national response Core Document Mechanisms to group and provide Federal resources and capabilities to support State and local responders Emergency Support Function Annexes Support Annexes Essential supporting aspects of the Federal response common to all incidents Incident Annexes Incident-specific applications of the Framework Partner Guides Next level of detail in response actions tailored to the actionable entity 24
National Incident Management System2008 1st edition NIMS Guidance Document issued in 2004 2nd edition NIMS Guidance Document issued in 2008 2008 NIMS Document: • Preparedness • Communications and Information Management • Resource Management • Command and Management • Ongoing Management and Maintence
National Incident Management System2008 Changes • Preparedness: • Additional roles of elected and appointed officials to define their responsibilities prior to and during an incident • Added key roles of NGOs and private sector, detailing how they should be integrated into preparedness efforts • Communications & Information Management • This componentwas heavily revised to better articulate the importance of communications and information management and is now comprised of three main sections. • Resource Management • The majority of the concept and principles within this component remained unchanged; however, clarifying language was added wherever possible to ensure readability.
National Incident Management System2008 Changes • Command and Management • Clarified the purpose of Area Command and how it fits into ICS • Expanded the Multiagency Coordination System (MACS) section to better define the process of Multiagency Coordination and the elements that make up the System • Replaced the term MAC Entities with MAC Groups • Major system elements within MACS now include Emergency Operation Centers (EOCs) and communications/dispatch centers. • Ongoing Management and Maintenance • As part of the restructuring of the component, the Supporting Technologies chapter of the 2004 NIMS was moved into the Ongoing Management and Maintenance Component in the 2008 version.
NIMS – the path forward • NIMS Compliance Metrics (FY09 and FY10) • NIMS Strategy Document • NIMS 5-year Training Plan • ICS Position-specific Training • ICS Emergency Responder Field Guide • NIMS Intelligence/Investigative Function Guide • NIMS Credentialing Guide
Planning Integrated Planning System (IPS) Comprehensive Preparedness Guides (CPGs)
National Planning Scenarios Source: National Response Framework (NRF) p.75
Implementing IPS • DHS develops, updates, or amends the Scenarios. • Coordinates with other Federal Departments and agencies. • Focused on risked-based planning. • Updated at least biennially. National Planning Scenarios • Developed by DHS; grouped into eight categories. • Outlines strategic priorities, broad national objectives. • Describes the envisioned “end-state.” Strategic Guidance Statements • Developed by DHS; one for each SGS. • Defines mission, roles, authorities, and responsibilities. • Establishes mission-essential tasks. Strategic Plans Federal HQ CONPLANS • Developed by FEMA – ESF inputs. • Describes the process for integrating and synchronizing existing Federal capabilities at the Regional level to accomplish NRF tasks. • Describes how Federal capabilities will be integrated into State plans. Regional CONPLANS
Exercise Design, Development, and Coordination National Exercise Program (NEP) Region 10 Exercise Program • Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) • Regional Exercise Support Program (RESP) • Northwest Interagency Exercise Coordination Group (NIECG) • Training and Exercise Planning Workshop (T&EPW) • Coordinate Federal exercise design and development • National Exercise Schedule (NEXS) • Corrective Action Program (CAP) • Lessons Learned Information Sharing (LLIS) System
Computer Modeling & Simulation Human/SME Modeling & Simulation Improvement Management & Exercise Eval Exercise Design & Delivery Plans Ops Log TEEX DHS S&T FBI HHS/CDC LLIs NxMSEL SANDIA EPA VNN DHS AARs LLIS DoD Private CIA U.A. CAP JHU APL Others EPA Others RAMP National Exercise and Simulation Center (NESC) To establish a state-of-the art National Exercise & Simulation Center (NESC) at FEMA Headquarters to serve the Department’s all-hazards preparedness and response program through the use of a central facility that pools resources, maximizes efficiency, and provides sustained exercise and training support to all stakeholders. NESC Core
Training FEMA Disaster Workforce Task Books and credentialing Newly released Independent Study Courses: IS-100a: Introduction to ICS (updated) IS-200a: Single Resources and Initial Action Incidents (updated) IS-700a: Intro to NIMS IS-800b: Intro to NRF IS-801-814: ESF Training (except ESF-6) IS-775: EOC Management and Operations IS-102: Deployment Basics for FEMA Response Partners IS-821: Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources Support Annex IEMC 2008 City of Spokane 11/08 Washington state 10/08 City of Bellingham 8/08 Pierce County 5/08 Federal Way 9/09
Continuity Programs • Approved by the FEMA Administrator on January 21, 2009 • CGC 1 provides Continuity guidance on: • Continuity Program Management information for the States, territories, tribal, and local government jurisdictions, and private sector organizations • Elements and components of a viable continuity capability • Coordination of interdependencies • Continuity plan operational phases and implementation
Continuity “Excellence Series” “Professional Continuity Practitioner” Continuity Excellence Series – Level I • COOP Awareness Course • Introduction to COOP • Effective Communication • COOP Manager’s T-t-T Course • COOP Planner’s T-t-T Workshop • Intro to Incident Command System (ICS) • Principles of Emergency Management • Intro to National Incident Management System (NIMS) • A National Response Framework (NRF), An Introduction • Exercise Development Course/Exercise Design Course/or COOP Exercise Design/Development T-t-T Course • Complete attendance in continuity exercise Determined Accord, and • NARA/CoSA Vital Records Training (optional, recommended)
Continuity “Excellence Series” “Master Continuity Practitioner” Continuity Excellence Series – Level II • Applicants must attain Continuity Excellence Series – Level I, Professional Continuity Practitioner • Exercise Evaluation and Improvement Planning • Leadership and Influence • Devolution Training • Building Design for Homeland Security T-t-T Course for Continuity of Operations • Instructional Delivery for Subject Matter Experts • Instruct COOP Manager’s T-t-T Course • Facilitate COOP Planner’s T-t-T Workshop, and • Written Comprehensive Exam
Integrated Public Alert and Warning Systems (IPAWS) Receive alert and warning information through as many means as possible
Community Preparedness 2 primary components Volunteer programs (i.e., Citizen Corps) Citizen Preparedness (i.e., Individual and Family preparedness)
Why is it critical to involve the Community? • Less than 1% of the U.S. population is an emergency responder • In 95% of situations, victim/ bystander first to respond Journal of Emergency Medical Services (2004); National Fire Protection Association (2003); National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund (2003)
Citizen Corps Partners The Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) program educates and trains citizens in basic disaster response skills Fire Corps promotes the use of citizen advocates to provide support to fire and rescue departments The Medical Reserve Corps (MRC) Program helps medical, public health, and other volunteers offer their expertise Neighborhood Watch/USAonWatch incorporates terrorism awareness education into its existing crime prevention mission Volunteers in Police Service (VIPS) works to enhance the capacity of state and local law enforcement to utilize volunteers
Harris County Citizen Corps Council Over 60,000 volunteers helped process 60,000 evacuees and shelter 30,000 at Reliant Center Katrina: Astrodome
FEMA Region 10: Citizen Corps AK ID OR WA Councils 11 11 39 62 CERT 3 27 49 62 Neighborhoods Watch 88 118 170 241 Volunteers in Police Service 12 22 43 78 Medical Reserve Corps 2 6 11 21 Fire Corps 3 6 12 29 As of April 8, 2009 www.citizencorps.gov
IV. Hazard Mitigation Division • Flood Map Modernization • Hazard Mitigation Plans • Risk Assessment (HAZUS) • Earthquake program Risk Analysis R10 Map Mod (04-08) $30 million • Hazard Mitigation Plans • Hazard Mitigation grants • Floodplain Management compliance • Flood Insurance Risk Reduction R10 HMGP - $160 million R10 PDM - $23 million R10 FMA - $7 million Mark Carey, Director
V. Grants Programs Division Infrastructure Security grants Homeland Security Grant Program State Homeland Security Grant Program (SHSP) Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) Metropolitan Medical Response System (MMRS) Citizen Corps Program (CCP) SHSP Tribal UASI Non-profit Security Grant Program (NSGP) Operation Stonegarden (OPSG) Transit Security Grant Program (TSGP) Port Security Grant Program (PSGP) Buffer Zone Protection Program (BZPP) Freight rail / Intercity Bus / Intercity rail / Trucking security Assistance to Firefighters Grants (AFG) Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) Interoperable Emergency Communications Grant Program (IECGP) Richard Donovan, Director
VI. Disaster Operations Division Response Operations Regional Response Coordination Center Operational Planning Disaster Logistics Emergency Communications Lon Biasco, Director
VII. Disaster Assistance Division Individual Assistance Planning and Prep • Mass Care • Emergency Assistance • Housing • Human Services • Conduct rapid Preliminary Damage Assessments (PDAs) • Rapid Establishment of Disaster Recovery Centers (DRCs) – fixed or mobile • Planning – evac, sheltering, feeding, voluntary org coordination, housing and human services, debris removal, generator requirements Public Assistance • Debris removal • Emergency Protective Measures • Restoration of damaged facilities Washington Storms – December 2007: 10,750 IA Registrations; $20 M in IA, $31 M SBA, $83 M in PA for 176 apps Washington Storms – December 2008: 10,727 IA Registrations; $20 M in IA, $32 M SBA, $78 M in PA for 376 apps Charles Axton, Director