1 / 24

Alternative Designs for a Joint C4I Capability Certification Management (JC3M) System

NAVAL POSTGRDUATE SCHOOL. Alternative Designs for a Joint C4I Capability Certification Management (JC3M) System. A Student Project. Gregory A. Miller Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, CA Paper 046. Motivation: Acquisition system & SoS integration needs.

luther
Download Presentation

Alternative Designs for a Joint C4I Capability Certification Management (JC3M) System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NAVAL POSTGRDUATE SCHOOL Alternative Designs for a Joint C4I Capability Certification Management (JC3M) System A Student Project Gregory A. Miller Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, CA Paper 046

  2. Motivation: Acquisition system & SoS integration needs Step #2 Perform Developmental Testing on Each System Step #1Develop Each System in Isolation Step #3 Integration Testing (w/o SoS rqmnts) Army System X Joint C4I System of Systems Marine System Y Air Force System A Navy System N Marine System Z Testing Agencies Developers & Program Offices Operating Forces Fielding Decision Paper 046

  3. Current SoS Testing and Fielding Step #1 Develop Systems in isolation Step #2 Perform Developmental Testing on each System Step #3 Perform System of Systems Testing Step #4 Field Problems with SoS testing • No performance measurements • What architecture is appropriate? Joint C4I SoS are large and constantly changing • Testing every SoS function is impossible • Hard to determine what failure is since quality of service requirements change Joint C4I System of Systems Paper 046

  4. What is the Real Problem? Is it that DoD does not define performance measures for Joint C4I SoS? Report Execute Plan Elicit Requirements Formal Report Live Testing Define Thresholds Simulation Define Architecture ID Systems Paper 046

  5. What’s the Solution? Develop a System that articulates SoS capabilities, determines whether SoS as a whole supports these capabilities, and reports the results Report Execute Plan Elicit Requirements Formal Report Paper review (On paper, did each SoS component meet articulated SoS capabilities?) Define Performance Certification Define Architecture ID Systems Live Testing Simulation Paper 046

  6. JC3M in Testing and Fielding (Currently unavoidable) (Replaces current SoS testing methodology) (Currently unavoidable) JC3M goals: • Acquire objective SoS performance measurements for acquisition and user communities • Produce decision data for stakeholders • Provide confidence in SoS performance for users Step #3 Perform JC3M (Plan, Execute, Report) Step #1 Develop Systems in isolation Step #2 Perform Developmental Testing on each System Step #3 Perform System of Systems Testing Step #4 Field Joint C4I System of Systems Paper 046

  7. Assess Performance Final Recommendation Customer Needs Problem Refinement Design Alternatives Modeling and Simulation Analysis of Alternatives Re-Evaluate Re-Evaluate Re-Evaluate Re-Evaluate Systems Engineering Process Paper 046

  8. Problem Refinement Design Alternatives Re-Evaluate Re-Evaluate Revised Problem Statement • Original problem focus: • Define Threshold Values • Research revealed the true problem … • Refined problem focus: • Define measures to be evaluated Paper 046

  9. Revised Problem Define performance measures for Joint C4I SoS Report Execute Plan Elicit Requirements Formal Report Live Testing Define Thresholds Define Measures Simulation Define Architecture ID Systems Paper review Paper 046

  10. JC3M Value Hierarchy • Developed from refined problem statement • Based on stakeholder analysis JC3M Plan C4I SoS Evaluation 1.0 Evaluate C4I SoS Capabilities 2.0 Report Results 3.0 Adaptability 4.0 Usability 5.0 Repeatability 6.0 Functional Non-Functional Paper 046

  11. JC3M Value Hierarchy Paper 046

  12. FEDOS MC3T Alternative #1 JTEM -CTM Alternative #2 Alternatives Paper 046

  13. Alternative #1 “System Capabilities Review (SCR)” Paper 046

  14. Alternative #2 “Functional Capability Board (FCB)” Paper 046

  15. Differences Paper 046

  16. Alternatives Summary Paper 046

  17. Fill in the blanks! Paper 046

  18. M&S Overview Paper 046

  19. Complete EM Paper 046

  20. Value Modeling Overview Translation of raw measurements into a normalized set of weighted values that can be added. Paper 046

  21. LCCE – Cost Summary Interpretation: The delta between the highest and lowest LCCE ≈ $3M, which is not a significant sum over a ten year span. Paper 046

  22. Utility & LCCE Paper 046

  23. LCCE vs Utility Paper 046

  24. Capability Portfolio Manager Likelihood Impact Way Ahead: 3 areas Functional Capability Board Paper 046

More Related