250 likes | 366 Views
Brown Grease to Biogas at WWTPs. Puget Sound Brown Grease Symposium April, 2009. Presentation Snapshot. Business Case (why FOG to Biogas?) Case Study: Millbrae, CA Data from first 12 months of operation Reduced solids production ~30% weight reduction Improved solids dewaterability
E N D
Brown Grease to Biogas at WWTPs Puget Sound Brown Grease Symposium April, 2009
Presentation Snapshot • Business Case (why FOG to Biogas?) • Case Study: Millbrae, CA • Data from first 12 months of operation • Reduced solids production • ~30% weight reduction • Improved solids dewaterability • Increase cake density, reduced polymer usage • Electricity production • Digester stability • Project Costs • Other Opportunities
Business Case: Why do it? • Reduce operating costs • Reduce waste to landfill (diversion) • To capitalize on “Green” aspects of project (gain prestige) • To help diversify local utility’s renewable portfolio • “Greener” replacement for composting operation
Business Case: How does it help me? • Can reduce demand for outside energy source (i.e. electricity, natural gas) • Can reduce solids being hauled from plant • Can increase waste diverted from landfills • Can create a revenue stream (tipping fees) • Can reduce carbon foot print of facility • Can provide good PR opportunities “The project here in Millbrae is cutting edge,” US Rep. Tom Lantos said. “It will allow us to develop energy independently and provide energy with resources we have not looked at in the past.” San Mateo Daily Journal, 8/31/2007
Business Case: What do we do? • Anaerobic Digester Upgrade (typically) • Add Gas Conditioning Equipment • Add Cogeneration Equipment (or other gas utilization technology) • Add Waste Receiving Station
Business Case: What if I do nothing? • Continue to “lose” money on missed opportunity • May miss funding opportunities • Waste streams may go to other facilities • Cost to do project will increase • Flared gas will be viewed as wasted opportunity
Project Background & Update • 2004 project planning started • January 2007 Grease receiving started • September 2008 1 million gallons received
Tank vent Forced air ventilation system with soil bed odor scrubber Enclosed 12,000 gallon polyethylene pre-fabricated tank with level sensor. 300 gpm chopper pump for tank mixing From Truck Loading Ramp Tank drain 25 gpm progressive cavity pump with variable speed drive 200 gpm progressive cavity pump Heated sludge circulation loop
Project Details • Will receive ~3000 gallons per day • Grease content = ~10% - 20% • Volatile solids destruction = 60% - 65% • Gas production = 15 CF/lb VS destroyed • Methane Content = 60% - 65% • Cost of electricity = $0.138/kWh • Tipping Fees: • $0.06 per gallon (negotiated with hauler)
FY 06-07 Utility vs Cogen Production No grease received, 150,000 July 13 through August 2, 2007 125,000 100,000 kWh Started receiving grease 75,000 Januaruy 18, 2007 50,000 25,000 0 Feb-07 Jul-06 Jul-07 Nov-06 Apr-07 Dec-06 Jun-07 Sep-06 Oct-06 Jan-07 Sep-07 Mar-07 May-07 Aug-06 Aug-07 Month PG&E Co-Gen Power Production
How much did it cost? • Total project cost ~$5.5 M • Base cogen facility ~$1.9 M • Switchgear upgrade ~$0.7 M • Grease receiving station ~$0.7 M • CNG storage facility ~$0.7 M • Digester mixing ~$1.5 M
Opportunities Note: This list is also broken down by state
Opportunities in WA Source: 2004 Clean Watersheds Needs Survey
Opportunities in OR Source: 2004 Clean Watersheds Needs Survey
Thank You • Greg Chung • gregchung@kennedyjenks.com • Richard York • (former plant superintendant) • Joseph Magner • jmagner@ci.millbrae.ca.us