80 likes | 221 Views
Summary of the discussion on Vision document. Group 2. Chair - B.Kjellson, rappoteur – S.Urbanas. General comments. Content is good, but the vision is not a “visionary” enough Set clear goals (that has to be reached in a long term), instead of assumptions or descriptions
E N D
Summary of the discussion on Vision document Group 2. Chair - B.Kjellson, rappoteur – S.Urbanas
General comments • Content is good, but the vision is not a “visionary” enough • Set clear goals (that has to be reached in a long term), instead of assumptions or descriptions • Vision should be shorter and more concrete - one page document • Vision - highlights from the benchmarking questionnaire • The current draft document could be used as a recycling for the vision • Vision should be understandable in wide public (even by politicians)
Other general advises • Support from academic sector (research industry) on setting the vision shall be elaborated • Put positive and negative aspects, derive conclusions • Security of individual’s property rights to be respected • Repetitions in articles to be removed
Questions formulating the vision • What shall we provide in the near future? • Different starting points in different countries exist. Shall the objectives be formulated for reaching a minimum level of development in Europe or different wheels strategy to be considered? • Are we limited only with functions of Cadastre or serving users with cadastral information? (change the title?)
Introduction • Corrections in 1st and 3rd sections are necessary: • More clarity on EuroGeographics strategy • Land registry is not a part of INSPIRE • Statement: cadastral information facilitates or makes possible the overall land administration as such
Trends section • Minimize or avoid abbreviations • Cooperation and collaboration trend to be added • European trends shall not limit only within the EU regulations. National experiences should be taken on board • Application development – quality of services • European (international) standardisation is the main target • Metadata is missing • 4th section in “organisation” is confusing and to be re-formulated
Last chapter • Content is ok, but editing is necessary • Business lines for Cadastre are not necessary within priorities in some countries • Integrity can be measured for example through performance indicators (not time or cost as present)