600 likes | 622 Views
This article discusses recent developments in the field of dark matter, including the interpretation of the DAMA/LIBRA signal and the PAMELA and ATIC experiments. It explores direct detection methods, the Earth's movement in relation to the Sun and Galaxy, and the results and interpretation of the DAMA/LIBRA experiment. It also covers topics such as non-extensive statistics, dark matter distributions, and the PAMELA satellite.
E N D
Recent developments in Dark Matter Malcolm Fairbairn
PART 1 :- DAMA/LIBRA signal and interpretation • PART 2 :- PAMELA, ATIC signal and interpretation
Part 1 DAMA/LIBRA signal and interpretation
DAMA/Libra experiment 250 kg of NaI(Ti)
Channelling in NaI Channeled events create more electrons and bigger signal
DAMA/LIBRA interpretation MF, Schwetz-Mangold, 0808.0704
DAMA/LIBRA interpretation However, large tension exists with XENON-10 and CDMS data... DAMA signal therefore cannot be dark matter?
Non Extensive Statistics At any given time, probability of a particular delay time, t, given by Over course of a year, bvaries quite a lot due to seasonal factors. Therefore, over the long term, one needs to include fluctuations in b
Non Extensive Statistics if b is sum over Gaussian random variables ... leads to a c2 distribution ... which yields
Is such a halo conceivable? To see, we need to solve Jeans equation
Part 2 PAMELA, ATIC signal and interpretation
Resurs-DK1satellite • Main task: multi-spectral remote sensing of earth’s surface • Built by TsSKB Progress in Samara, Russia • Lifetime >3 years (assisted) • Data transmitted to ground via high-speed radio downlink • PAMELA mounted inside apressurized container Mass: 6.7 tonnes Height: 7.4 m Solar array area: 36 m2
Secondary production‘Moskalenko + Strong model’ without reacceleration. ApJ 493 (1998) 694. STOLEN FROM 2007 PRESENTATION BY MARK PEARCE, KTH STOCKHOLM Positrons PAMELA Secondary production‘M+S model’ + primarycc distortion Secondary production‘Leaky box model’ R. Protheroe, ApJ 254 (1982) 391. Primary production from cc annihilation (m(c) = 336 GeV) Baltz + Edsjö, Phys Rev D59 (1999) 023511.
Discrepancy may be explained by variable solar activity. This one not! Adriani et al. 0810.4995
Is it actually positrons? (0905.0444) Intensity of cosmic ray protons at 10 GeV exceeds that of positrons by 5 x 105
Chang et al. Nature 456, 362, 20th November 2008 ATIC AMS PPB
Compatibility of the two experiments Cholis et al 0811.3641
Can be interpreted as Dark matter Cut-off corresponding to 620 GeV KK particle However, need large boost factors, B = ( 10, 102, 103 ) for mDM = ( 100 GeV, 1 TeV, 10 TeV) respectively
Possible origins of the Boost Factor Thermally averaged self annihilation cross section today Actual local density Branching ratio into e+e- Expected local density (0.3 GeV cm-3) Thermally averaged self annihilation cross section at freeze-out
Problems with diffusion equations? Energy injection term = f(r)?, f(q)?, f(E)? Energy loss term = f(r)?, f(q)?, f(E)? Diffusion term = f(r)?, f(q)?, f(E)?
Probes of GUT scale physics Decay of WIMP via dimension six operator. Decay of WIMP via dimension five operator. Avanitaki et al. arXiv:08122075.
Probes of GUT scale physics Lower Limit on dark matter lifetime Avanitaki et al. arXiv:08122075.
Probes of GUT scale physics Avanitaki et al. arXiv:08122075.
Probes of GUT scale physics What a fit! until Monday... Avanitaki et al. arXiv:08122075.
New H.E.S.S. data 0905.0105
New Fermi Data 0905.0025
Where are we now? Astrophysical origin of electrons/positrons 10 GeV – 10 TeV Pulsars - Primary SNR - Secondary
Where are we now? • high energy electron/positron flux > 10 GeV still anomalously large Grasso et al. 0905.0636 Can fit FERMI by assuming local increase in SNR, but not PAMELA