340 likes | 349 Views
SCIPP R&D on the International Linear Collider Detector. DOE Site Visit June 8, 2006 Presenter: Bruce Schumm. Summary of Activities. R&D Activity is increasing, with studies now on a number of fronts: Physics/machine studies for e - e - running (see Heusch)
E N D
SCIPP R&D on the International Linear Collider Detector DOE Site Visit June 8, 2006 Presenter: Bruce Schumm
Summary of Activities • R&D Activity is increasing, with studies now on a number of fronts: • Physics/machine studies for e-e- running (see Heusch) • Billior-based calculation of tracking errors • Detector resolution standards from physics simulation • Reconstruction capabilities of all-silicon tracking • Hardware proof-of-principle of low-noise silicon strip readout
Current Involvements (all part time) • 4 senior physicists • 1 post-doc (looking for a second) • 8 undergraduate students (major contribution) • 1 engineer and 2 technical staff • 1 bored spouse of a Silicon Valley engineer. Leadership Roles Heusch is member of International Cooperation Committee Schumm is lead convener of North American Tracking Working Group
Detector Resolution Standards from Selectron Production Participants: Senior Physicist Bruce Schumm Undergraduate Thesis Students Sharon Gerbode, Heath Holguin,Troy Lau*, Paul Moser, Adam Perlstein, Joseph Rose, Matthew Vegas Community Member (on hold before Grad School) Ayelet Lorberbaum *Recipient of two Undergraduate Research Awards; grad school at U. Michigan.
Motivation To explore the effects of limited detector resolution on our ability to measure SUSY parameters in the forward region. SiD Tracker
Selectrons vs. cos() SPS1A at 1 TeV Roughly ½ of statistics above |cos()| of 0.8, but… Electrons vs. cos()
The spectrum is weighted towards higher energy at high |cos()|, so there’s more information in the forward region than one might expect.
Determine the selectron mass accuracy in both the central (0 < |cos| < .8) and full (0 < |cos| < 1) region
Ongoing work: Fitting simulaneously for selectron and gaugino (0) masses at Ecm = 500 GeV This is an ILC Physics benchmark process (Schumm, Vegas)
Simulation of SiD Tracking System (and SiD variants) Participants: Senior Physicist Bruce Schumm Recent Graduate Students Christian Flacco, Michael Young Undergraduate Students John Mikelich, Tyler Rice, Lori Stevens, Eric Wallace, Ayelet Lorberbaum
Simulation of SiD Tracking System, continued Three areas of work: Fast MC Simulation Billior-based LCDTRK.f (B. Schumm) provides covariance matrices for fast MC simulation and resolution plots. SiD Tracking Capabilities Explore tracking performance of SiD tracker and variants Microstrip Pulse Development Simulation Provides simulation of pulse development and amplification for designing and detector layout
LCDTRK.f comparison of SiD options with TESLA (LDC) design, from Snowmass 2005
Pattern Recognition Capabilities of an All-Silicon Central Tracker Can one do pattern recognition with only five central tracking layers? Might more layers improve performance to an extent that justifies the extra material? SiD Tracker Current code: “VXDBasedReco” Nick Sinev, Oregon
EFFICIENCIES FOR QQBAR EVENTS Doesn’t look that spectacular; what might be going on here?
Of course! The requirement of a VXD stub means that you miss anything that originates beyond r ~ 3cm. This is about 5% of all tracks. With current “VXDBasedReco” algorithm, we won’t get the ~5% of tracks that originate beyond 2cm.
Outside-in Tracking (Eric Wallace) Circle-fit tracker (Tim Nelson, SLAC) developed at Snowmass, makes use only of central tracker information Eric has optimized this algorithm for finding non-prompt tracks after hits from VXDBasedReco tracks are flagged Remaining tracks found with ~80% efficiency All remaining tracks Found Not found Radial Origin (mm) Essential tool for SiD tracker optimization.
CURVATURE ERROR vs. CURVATURE Michael Young, Eric Wallace Standard (Original) Code
Ongoing Track Reconstruction Work • Primary focus of new crop of undergrad thesis students (plus Ayelet Lorberbaum) • Expand Eric’s work to get polished combined-algorithm tracking code • Explore other tracking algorithms (GARFIELD calorimeter-stub extender [Kansas State], Kalman filter code [SLAC, Colorado]) • Begin to optimize SiD geometry (number of layers, layer spacing, tracker radius)
The SCIPP/UCSC ILC HARDWARE GROUP Faculty/Senior Vitaliy Fadeyev Alex Grillo Bruce Schumm Abe Seiden Post-Docs Jurgen Kroseberg [Active Search] Students Greg Horn Glenn Gray Bryan Matsuo (Comp.Sci.) Lead Engineer: Ned Spencer Technical Staff: Max Wilder, Forest Martinez-McKinney Primary Goal: Overall proof-of-principle in 2008 test beam run
Silicon Microstrip Readout R&D • Initial Motivation • Exploit long shaping time (low noise) and power cycling to: • Remove electronics and cabling from active area (long ladders) • Eliminate need for active cooling SiD Tracker
The Gossamer Tracker • Ideas: • Low noise readout Long ladders substantially limit electronics readout and support • Thin inner detector layers • Exploit duty cycle eliminate need for active cooling Competitive with gaseous tracking over full range of momenta (also: forward region) Alternative: shorter ladders, but better point resolution
Pulse Development Simulation Long Shaping-Time Limit: strip sees signal if and only if hole is col-lected onto strip (no electrostatic coupling to neighboring strips) Include:Landau deposition (SSSimSide; Gerry Lynch LBNL), variable geometry, Lorentz angle, carrier diffusion, electronic noise and digitization effects
128 mip 1 mip Operating point threshold Readout threshold 1/4 mip
The LSTFE-2 ASIC Process: TSMC 0.25 m CMOS 3 s shaping time; analog readout it Time-Over-Thres-hold with 400 nsec clock
Electronics Simulation Detector Noise: From SPICE simulation, normalized to bench tests with GLAST electronics Analog Measurement: Employs time-over-threshold with variable clock speed; lookup table provides conversions back into analog pulse height (as for actual data) RMS Gaussian Fit Essential tool for design of front-end ASIC Detector Resolution (units of 10m)
INITIAL RESULTS LSTFE-2 chip mounted on readout board FPGA-based control and data-acquisition system
Data & Plots: Greg Horn 0.80 fC 0.46 fC Comparator S Curves Vary threshold for given in put charge Read out system with FPGA Get 1-erf(threshold) with 50% point given response, and width giving noise 1.11 fC 1.42 fC 1.73 fC 2.04 fC
Data & Plots: Greg Horn Current Results Gain and Noise (Load = 150 pF, or about a 115 cm detector) Result: ~5300 electrons noise Expectation: ~1400 electrons noise Picoprobe studies isolate problem to shaper stage Power Cycling Switch-on time 20-40 msec gives 10-20% duty cycle (want 1-2%) Development of next version of LSTFE chip underway
DIGITAL ARCHITECTURE: FPGA DEVELOPMENT Digital logic should perform basic zero suppression (intrinsic data rate for entire tracker would be approximately 50 GHz), but must retain nearest-neighbor information for accurate centroid.
Li Hi Li+1 Hi+1 Li+2 Hi+2 Li+3 Hi+3 Li+4 Hi+4 Li+5 Hi+5 Li+6 Hi+6 Proposed LSTFE Back-End Architecture Low Comparator Leading-Edge-Enable Domain 8:1 Multi-plexing (clock = 50 ns) FIFO (Leading and trailing transitions) Event Time Clock Period = 400 nsec
DIGITAL ARCHITECTURE VERIFICATION ModelSim package permits realistic simulation of FPGA code (for now, up to signal propagation delay) Simulate detector background and noise rates for 500 GeV running, as a function of read-out threshold. Per 128 channel chip ~ 7 kbit per spill 35 kbit/second For entire long shaping-time tracker ~ 0.5 GHz data rate (x100 data rate suppression) Nominal Readout Threshold
OVERALL SUMMARY • Linear Collider R&D at SCIPP is: • Directly benefiting from SCIPP expertise • Focused on central issues for the ILC that are applicable to any detector scenario • Supporting leadership roles (international cooperation, oversight of tracking RD) • Providing key educational opportunities, undergrad through postdoc, with a good placement record