140 likes | 299 Views
HILMA-University Network /Background. National network of 8 universities, develops co-operation in all levels of teaching, research
E N D
1. E-learning, networking and feminist pedagogy as strategies in Finnish Women's Studies Gender & ICT-symposium
Manchester , 1.2.2005
2. HILMA-University Network /Background National network of 8 universities, develops co-operation in all levels of teaching, research & information
Areal equality – shared resources
Profiles of each unit sharpened & appreciated
Financed by Ministry of Education 2004-06
Especially e-courses, support to teachers, pedagogical education
Networking with other networks (national, european)
Portal: www.helsinki.fi/hilma
3. Virtual Christina (in Helsinki University) Strategy for ICT-development 2004-06: * production of 2-3 new e-courses yearly
(evaluation of these)
* education for teachers
(both technical skills & web-pedagogy)
* intranet communication
* improving www-information
(shared course-materials)
* windows outside the academy
www.helsinki.fi/kristiina-instituutti
www.helsinki.fi/minna
4. E-courses of HILMA open to all WS-students in Finland, started 2001
combination of open& closed environments
strengths & profiles of each institute presented
part of Finnish Virtual University
10-20 participants, 4-10 ECTS/course
students / teachers reactions
5. Course Examples: The audio-visual technologies of Gender (Koivunen) http://www.helsinki.fi/kristiina-instituutti/verkkokurssi/spavtekno
The feminists of 1900´s – life and work of Kollontai, Goldman& Colette (Rotkirch)
http://www.helsinki.fi/kristiina-instituutti/verkkokurssi/feministit
Space & Gender (Saarikangas)
http://www.helsinki.fi/kristiina-instituutti/verkkokurssi/sptila
6. Our E-course-concept Developing in teams (3-4): teacher(s) (1-2), technical coordinator, HILMA, Educational center for ICT
combination of open www-sites & closed environments
Beside the subject students learn how to use net-libraries (FinELib, EBSCOhost etc.)
students/teachers learn e-learning (meta-skills)
7. Why, how, what for? increase interactions (student-teacher / student-student)
gives opportunities to teach writing & thinking
metaskills of learning, ICT-knowledge for students (useful in labourmarket)
image/profile: WS is active in promoting ICT’s
teachers will reflect their own pedagogical practices
8. Strategies… ICT’s have changed the ways of working and teaching in the universities; prefered role in this change: active & innovative
more shared expertise, more shared projects, socially decentralized kognition (knowledge belongs to community, not individuals)
teaching is more visible – e-pedagogy-discussion has increased pedagogical discussion in general
using ICT’s in universities does not demand teachers being nerds (neither hype…)
high quality in WS-teaching & research demands also innovative pedagogy
9. Web-pedagogy (/good pedagogy?) in general
learning happens in communication/interaction/discussion
cognition is constructed together, in collaborate process
(difficult/complex tasks demand over-individual processing)
learner is subject in her/his own learning – active role
possibilities to reflex, analyse own learning process, to return
10. …good web-pedagogy (continued…) intentionality - cognitive goals needed (e-courses make planning more transparent)
contextuality (situated knowledge, authentic questions)
textuality – academic work is reading, thinking, writing:e-courses give excellent possibilities to quide/teach all this
positive transfer of learning – meta-skills achieved
11. Good Web-teacher? teachers role: cognitive, social & teaching presence
facilitating discourse and interaction, giving motivation, feedback, guidance & support helping learners in networking
these roles can also be divided when sharing expertise (teaching together?)
zone of immediate development (Vygotsky) – emotional dimensions of learning/working-environment: good teacher activates this
12. Feminist pedagogy? Feminism is a dialectic discovery process, researching differences, focusing on gender
emansipatory intentions
construction on experiences (personal/political)
women-friendly practises? – safety? emotions?
strengthening self-confidence, enhancing self-reflection
”giving a voice” ? (multiple voices)
13. Connecting these… making e-courses good, feminist learning environments
giving ”intellectual gifts” – teaching/learning as exchange
students as ”younger colleques”
both teachers and students are participating in a process, which changes conventional ways of working in the academy
shared expertise is a strategic choice
14. Co-operation? first international web-course in 2001 (”Knowing feminism - feminist knowing ” with universities of Stockholm, Tartto, Riga & Vilnius)
Nordplus Neighbour-project (Tallinn, Riga, Helsinki)
ATHENA-ICT-projects (european web-MA in WS?)
other possible joint projects?
15. Finally… feminist pedagogy (/teaching) can be combined with good e-learning
putting things to web, using ICT’s does not necessarily mean ”good pedagogical practises” – content & quality of teaching are in main role
WS has a history of critical disciplin – being critical combined with being active & innovative can bring good quality of e-learning & e-pedagogy