310 likes | 475 Views
Connecting Function and Topology (of small biological circuits). Chao Tang University of California, San Francisco. International Workshop and Conference on Network Science, Queens, NY, May 22, 2007. Collaborators. Wenzhe Ma (Center for Theoretical Biology Peking University UCSF).
E N D
Connecting Function and Topology(of small biological circuits) Chao Tang University of California, San Francisco International Workshop and Conference on Network Science, Queens, NY, May 22, 2007
Collaborators Wenzhe Ma (Center for Theoretical Biology Peking UniversityUCSF) Prof. Qi Ouyang Prof. Luhua Lai (CTB, PKU)
Function follows form! Form follows function!
“Function Follows Form” -- 29,100 hits • “Form Follows Function” -- 363,000 hits (As of 5/19/2007)
[A] t A A [A] t A Function and form in biology ? ? ? ? Macroscopic Microscopic Organismic Molecular Bistability Oscillation Patterning Signal transduction Homeostasis Adaptation Cell polarization Cell division … …
What kinds of networks can perform this function?Why did nature pick the one in fly?How would i design it? Need at least two components
… … … … A B A B A B Enumerate all 2-node networks 4x2=8 edges 3 possibilities per edge 38=6561 networks E E W W
n/4k B A A1 B A A k A2 Model of regulation n,k A B t then Define
A B A B A B An example … … Q=fraction of parameter space that can perform the function
What are these 45 networks? Distribution of Q values
Essential Neutral Bad Very bad Skeletons and families Three and half topological features: Positive loop on E Positive loop on W Mutual intercellular activation of E and W Mutual repression if extracellular loop
A E E W W A … … W E W E W E … … W E W E W E W E W W E W W E W Topology follows function
3-node networks 3x6=18 edges 318=387,420,489 networks E E Only two extracellular signaling 315=14,348,907 S S W W
? Distribution of Q values
Functional modules Bistability Sharp boundaries Bistability
44 combinations form the skeletons for all robust networks (Q>0.1) Q=0.58 Q=0.66 Q=0.63 Q=0.59 Q=0.50 Q=0.66 Q=0.63 Q=0.29 Q=0.34 Q=0.26 Q=0.48
Essential Neutral Bad Very bad Family size versus Q value Skeletons with larger Q have larger family size
E E W W W E W E Q values of the modules Q = QE×QW×QB ? E module W module B module
Two candidates for bionetwork ? Derek Lessing and Roel Nusse, (1998) Development 125, 1469-1476 Marita Buescher, et al. (2004) Current Biology, 14, 1694-1702 Hsiu-Hsiang Lee and Manfred Frasch, Development 127, 5497-5508 (2000) ?
patched mutant W W E E W W W W E ptc mutant wild type W E W E continuous Hh signaling
zw3 mutant W E E E E W W E E zw3(shaggy) mutant wild type W E W E continuous Wingless signaling
W E W E W W E E W W W W E zw3 mutant, or ectopic expression of Wg W E E E E W W E E Wild type patched mutant Mutant tests for the two candidates
Q=0.36 Why fly picked this one? Q=0.61 The best without any direct auto positive loop
Summary • Robust functionality drastically limits network topology. • Modular structure originates from subfunctions • Modularity provides combinatorial variability • Evolvability and pleiotropy • The one selected by nature may be optimized under biological constraints • Hh and Wg signaling are utilized in other functions • More complex functions from simpler modules • Examples in transcription control and protein domains • Hierarchical build up of modules • Simplicity of biological systems Molecular Systems Biology 2, 70 (2007)