50 likes | 130 Views
Explore the ARD's contribution to analyzing productivity growth in large and small businesses, variables collected, sampling methods, and challenges faced since 1998. Discover insights into the productivity of foreign firms, skills, and innovation through various studies referenced.
E N D
Work analysing productivity using ARD 1. Contribution of entry and exit to productivity growth: Disney, Haskel and Heden (2003); Barnes and Haskel (2000); Griffith and Simpson (2001). 2. Productivity of foreign firms: Oulton (2000); Harris (2002); Harris et al. (2003) 3. Productivity and skills (NES and ESS): Barnes and Haskel(2000), Haskel and Pereira (2002) 4. Productivity and innovation (matched to the CIS) Criscuolo and Haskel (2002)
ARD • The ARD is formed from the Annual Business Inquiry (ABI) from 1998 onwards and previous surveys before that (e.g. Annual Census of Production (ACOP)). • Data prior 1998: Data on production and construction activities • Data post 1998: Production, construction, distribution and services • It is a census of large businesses (>250 employees), and a sample of smaller ones. • The businesses selected for the surveys are drawn since 1994 from the ONS Inter-departmental Business Register (IDBR).
Variables: • The central variables collected are employment, turnover/output, capital expenditure, wage cost, and intermediate consumption. • Postcodes, industrial classification (SIC codes), ownership • Problems: • The range of variables has varied over the years and the same variable names can sometimes hide changing definitions. • No information on prices or capital stock
Other issues: • Level of aggregation: • From 1994 onwards the reporting levels are “Enterprise group”, “enterprise” and “local unit” • Reporting Units (plant or group of plants) are the fundamental unit on the ARD • There are also changes in the terminology. • Sampling frame: • The selected sample of small firms rotates to prevent the excessive sampling of SMEs. The sample frame has varied from year to year.