E N D
1. ESD Evaluation of the Emerging MuGFET Technology C. Russ et. al 2005 ESD/EOS Conference
2. Slide 2 Oh No! Is ESD Going to be MuGGed by Yet Another Technology Development??
3. Slide 3 Purpose of this work Introduce the exciting new Multi-Gate Advanced Transistor Technology called the “MuGFET” and assess its sensitivity to high current ESD behavior
Investigate suitable ESD protection methods for this new technology
4. Slide 4 Outline Introduction: MultiGate FETs (MuGFETs)
ESD Characterization
Fully depleted (FD) MuGFETs
Partially depleted (PD) planar FETs
Diodes
Failure analysis
Protection approaches
Conclusions
5. Slide 5 Introduction (1) Classical FET in Bulk Si
6. Slide 6 Introduction (2) Planar FET Device in SOI
7. Slide 7 Introduction (3) MuGFET Device
(or “Fin”-FET)
8. Slide 8 Introduction (4)
9. Slide 9 Outline Introduction: MultiGate FETs (MuGFETs)
ESD Characterization
Fully depleted (FD) MuGFETs
Partially depleted (PD) planar FETs
Diodes
Failure analysis
Protection approaches
Conclusions
10. Slide 10 Test structures
11. Slide 11 Test structures NMOS and Gate diodes available as MuGFET (‘Fin’) and planar SOI types
Fin width = 50nm, Fin heights = 88 and 60nm
Nickel silicided (no silicide blocking)
12. Slide 12 MuGFET: Grounded Gate NMOS Unprecedented high ESD sensitivity ? failure instantaneous after breakdown!
L pushes out breakdown, but no snapback visible
13. Slide 13 MuGFET: MOS-diode, Gate tied high
14. Slide 14 Planar PD SOI NFET: Grounded Gate
15. Slide 15 Gated Diodes: Fins + Planar (fwd. mode)
16. Slide 16 Gated Diodes: Fins + Planar (rev. mode)
17. Slide 17 Outline Introduction: MultiGate FETs (MuGFETs)
ESD Characterization
Fully depleted (FD) MuGFETs
Partially depleted (PD) planar FETs
Diodes
Failure analysis
Protection approaches
Conclusions
18. Slide 18 Failure Analysis: NFETs
19. Slide 19 Failure Analysis: Diodes (fwd. mode)
20. Slide 20 Failure Analysis: Pulse Width vs. It2
21. Slide 21 Protection Approaches
22. Slide 22 Conclusions New issues for emerging Multigate technologies:
FinFET MOS: extremely ESD-susceptible
Local burn-out of fins
Planar MOS: reasonable ESD hardness
Uniform failure signature (even fully silicided!)
Available in same process
Lower trigger than FinFET ? local clamp
Gate-biased MOS:
Possible as protection, BJT conduction must strictly be avoided
Gated diodes (Fin-type and planar):
Diodes needed in any protection scheme
FinFET diodes: high ESD currents possible!
23. Gate Dielectric Integrity along the Road Map of CMOS Scaling including Multi-Gate FET, TiN Metal Gate, and HfSiON High-k Gate Dielectric
24. Slide 24 Investigate:
Influences of multi-gate architecture and metal gate on gate dielectric reliability.
Demonstrate:
Dielectric reliability trend along the road map towards a CMOS process using triple gate architecture, metal gate, and HfSiON gate dielectric. Purpose
25. Slide 25
26. Slide 26
27. Slide 27
28. Slide 28
29. Slide 29
30. Slide 30
31. Slide 31 State of the art gate dielectric reliability can be achieved for CMOS processes using vertical multi-gate architectures.
GOX reliability trend along the road map of CMOS scaling will be dominated by metal gates and high-k dielectrics.
The use of metal gate increases gate leakage current density and reduces SiO2 reliability margin for PFET devices compared to poly-Si/SiO2.
NFET & HfSiON: the extrapolation of dielectric reliability to use conditions needs to consider the strong dependence of gate leakage on gate voltage.
PFET & HfSiON: the dielectric reliability meets the level of a standard poly-Si/SiO2 gate stack of same EOT. Conclusions