1 / 12

Estimates of vapor pressure for the LJ system below the triple point

Estimates of vapor pressure for the LJ system below the triple point. Barbara N. Hale Physics Department Missouri University of Science & Technology Rolla, MO 65401. Motivation.

Download Presentation

Estimates of vapor pressure for the LJ system below the triple point

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Estimates of vapor pressure for the LJ system below the triple point Barbara N. Hale Physics Department Missouri University of Science & Technology Rolla, MO 65401

  2. Motivation One of the challenges in predicting nucleation rates from potential models is obtaining a reliable equilibrium vapor density at low temperatures, where the experimental rate data exist. Equally troublesome for experimentalists is extrapolating measured vapor pressure data far below the freezing point. In this work we present “small cluster Monte Carlo simulation based” estimates of the LJ system vapor pressure at reduced temperatures, T/k = 0.33, 0.42, 0.50 and 0.70. The results are presented in a “Dunikov” corresponding states analysis together with an extrapolated vapor pressure formula, vapor pressure data (at high temperatures) and results from other MC simulations.* * B. Hale and Mark Thomason, Scaled Nucleation in a LJ System, submitted.

  3. Model Lennard-Jones System  dilute LJ vapor system with volume, V non-interacting mixture of ideal gases each n-cluster size is ideal gas of Nn clusters  full LJ interaction potential separable classical Hamiltonian

  4. Cluster Free Energy Differences n = number of atoms in cluster - fn = ln Qn – ln(Qn-1Qn) n   - fn ln [ ρliquid /ρ1,vapor]

  5. Canonical Configuration Integral Qn = … exp[-i >j VLJ(|ri-rj|)/kT]dnri Monte Carlo Bennett method is used to calculate ratios: Qn/ [Qn-1 Q1]

  6. Schematic of Monte Carlo Simulations Ensemble B: n cluster with normal probe interactions Ensemble A: (n -1) cluster with monomer probe interactions turned off -fn= lnQn- ln(Qn-1Q1)

  7. Dunikov Corresponding States Approach D. O. Dunikov, S. P. Malyshenko and V. V. Zhakhovskii, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 6623 (2001)demonstrated that LJ potential model systems (full potential and cutoff models) and experimental argon data display corresponding states properties. That is, for the LJ liquid number density [ρliq ([T/Tc])/ρc]LJ [ρliq(T/Tc)/ρc]Argon Using this approximation, an estimate of the full LJ potential vapor densitycan be obtained from the small cluster free energy difference intercepts, lnIo: ln ρvapor,LJ ln ρliq,LJ – lnIo

  8. References • Argon vapor pressure formula: A. Fladerer and R. Strey, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 164710 (2006); K. Iland, J. Wolk and R. Strey, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 54506 (2007). • Monte Carlo simulations for LJ vapor number density at T* = 0.7: B. Chen, J. I. Siepmann, K. J. Oh, and M. L. Klein, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 10903 (2001) • Argon experimental vapor pressure data: R. Gilgen, R. Kleinram and W. Wagner, J. Chem. Therm. 22, 399 (1994) • Monte Carlo simulations of small LJ clusters: B. N. Hale and M. Thomason, “Scaled Nucleation in a Lennard-Jones System”, submitted for publication.

  9. Summary & Comments • Estimates of vapor pressures for the full LJ potential system at reduced temperatures, T/k = 0.33, 0.42, 0.50 and 0.70, are obtained from small cluster free energy differences. • Using a corresponding states approach, the results are compared with extrapolations of an argon vapor pressure formula, experimental data at high temperature, and MC simulation results at T/k = 0.7.

More Related