230 likes | 404 Views
Constitutional Law II. Mr. Wiecek. First Amendment. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble,
E N D
Constitutional Law II Mr. Wiecek
First Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
First Amendment 1. Clear and present danger (c&pd) 2. Categorization 3. Hostile audience 4. Symbolic speech 5. Free exercise of religion 6. Establishment of religion
Rationales for free speech • “marketplace of ideas”/search for truth • democracy & self-governance • individual dignity, autonomy, & self-fulfillment
Historical background • English: • licensing (prior restraint) • seditious libel • truth not a defense • bad tendency • American • Zenger’s Case (1735): juries • Levy vs. Levy on framers’ intent • 1791-1917
Clear & present danger Proximate cause Bad tendency
Advocacy-incitement distinction Hand in Masses Publ. speech advocacy incitement act Dennis
Clear & present danger test speech substantive evil
Race and equal protection Race- neutral Race-explicit Strict scrut. Korematsu Purpose- impact Wash. V. Davis Burden minorities Affirmative action Croson, Adarand Benefit minorities ?
The basic paradigm of American constitutional law governmental power individual liberty
Dual federalism Federal State
No-man’s land State Federal the no-man’s land
The public-private distinction Private Public government can regulate immune from regulation
Ideological continuum L C Liberal Conservative Epstein Bork
Judicial activism economic non-economic L C (Epstein) activism L judicial self-restraint C (Bork)
prosecutor report presentment House of Reps grand jury indictment impeachment criminal trial trial before U.S. Senate
Regulation vs. takings taking regulation redistribution (Calder v. Bull) police power non-compensable compensation required
Dolan balancing test state’s interest impact of regulation condition of permit state’s interest impact of regulation Ends test? Means test?
Scrutiny levels ends means strict “compelling” “narrowly tailored” “rationally related” “legitimate” deferential
Scrutiny levels (intermediate) deferential strict
Lowi, End of Repub. Era Liberal Conservative “new” “old” Capitalism Moral values Coercive gov’t [Left/ socialist] Free markets Individualism Amorality