1 / 21

Some Statistical Antics in the Media

Some Statistical Antics in the Media . Arnold Barnett, MIT. Correlation is Not Always Causality. It Is Sometimes Nothing . “Why Music Matters”. “Kids who study music get higher scores on their SATs. … Music helps to improve overall academic performance .” -- Parade Magazine, 12/28/03.

maeko
Download Presentation

Some Statistical Antics in the Media

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Some Statistical Antics in the Media Arnold Barnett, MIT

  2. Correlation is Not Always Causality. It IsSometimesNothing.

  3. “Why Music Matters” “Kids who study musicget higher scores on their SATs. … Music helps to improve overall academic performance.” --ParadeMagazine, 12/28/03

  4. "I know from experience that everyone who taught Statistics got a lower (student) evaluation than those who taught courses that are a little less challenging.” --John Antel, Provost, University of Houston (quoted in WSJ 10/23/10)

  5. This week, a student sent me an “analysis” that argued that having a passport reduces the risk of diabetes.Anything wrong with this?

  6. Some Comparisons Can BeIntensely Misleading

  7. The New York TimesIdentifies 2003’s “Top Summer Movies” MovieRelease Date Finding Nemo May 30 The Matrix Reloaded May 15 Pirates of the Caribbean July 9 Bruce Almighty May 23 X2: X-Men United May 2 The rankings were based on “box office receipts, May 2 to August 24, 2003” (!!!!!)

  8. “Oscar likes films with concise titles” -- TIME, 2000 TIME based this conclusion on its study of best-picture winners over the previous 20 years.

  9. Really? Some Data about Title Lengths TIME’s Winners All US Movies Mean2.3 Words 2.6 words Median2.5 words 2.0 words

  10. Some Data Analyses Make Little Sense

  11. Racial Differences Emerge in Poll --Wall Street Journal (12/19/02) “Will US Do Enough to Identify Potential Terrorists, or Will It Go Too Far?” 57% 45% Won’t Do Enough Will Go Too Far Whites Blacks

  12. “Only once in its 107-year history has the Dow Jones Industrial Average suffered a lower close four years in a row. So …..the odds against it happening this year are something like 104-to-1.” ---Barron’s, 1/3/03

  13. Of course, the Dow Jones can only decline for a fourth year in a row when it has declinedthe previous three years. N’est ce pas?

  14. That circumstance had onlyarisen inthreeyears: 1904,1932, and 1942.In one of these years (namely, 1932) the Dow Jones declined yet again.Proper estimate:1 in 3?

  15. In April 2010, The New York Times informed us of “the best places” to hail a cab in Manhattan. Its computer analysis of 90 million rides identified the places where the largest numbers of people had started their taxi rides.

  16. But the number of people who caught cabs at spot X is not the same as the percentage of people who sought cabs at X and actually got them. And isn’t the percentage the appropriate metric for passenger success?

  17. Bad Data CanKill

  18. A statistical expert testifying in 2000 for Vice-President Gore stated that the Florida punch-card ballot wasdefective on its left side.

  19. As evidence, he noted a 1998 election in Palm Beach County, in which there were3% fewer votesrecorded in the race for Senator (left side of the ballot) than for Governor (right side).

  20. The opposing attorney asked whether the witness had ever examined the 1998 Palm Beach ballot. Had he done so, the lawyer said, he would have realized that the Senate and Governor’s races wereboth on the left side of the ballot.

  21. Thus, the statistician’s left/right comparison was preposterous.(The statistician looked pale.)

More Related