240 likes | 327 Views
Ways of Proceeding: (En)Visioning LGBTQ Work in a Jesuit Context. July 19, 2010 Sivagami Subbaraman, Director Matthew LeBlanc, Program Coordinator. Framing. In Dreams Begins Responsibility Ways of Proceeding. LGBTQ Resource Center—Our Vision.
E N D
Ways of Proceeding:(En)Visioning LGBTQ Work in a Jesuit Context July 19, 2010 Sivagami Subbaraman, Director Matthew LeBlanc, Program Coordinator
Framing • In Dreams Begins Responsibility • Ways of Proceeding
LGBTQ Resource Center—Our Vision We envision Georgetown to be an institution which promotes equity & affords wholeness for its lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning students, staff, faculty, and alumni.
Exigence for the LGBTQ Resource Center • 84% report verbal harassment at school (GLSEN) • 55% of transgender youth report physical attacks based on their gender identity/expression (GLSEN) • 28% of LGBT youth drop out of school due to harassment (GLSEN) • 42% of homeless youth are LGBT (NGLTF) • Mental & Emotional Health • 30% of gay teens considered suicide • 28% made a plan to commit suicide • 32% attempted suicide. • (13, 12, 8 for heterosexual counterparts) (Wash Blade)
Exigence for the LGBTQ Resource Center • Need to create a visibly supportive climate for LGBTQ people • Encourage education about & social interaction among LGBTQ and allied people • Promote proactive affirmation & change on the campus
ProceedingLGBTQ : as center and circle • Nine Jesuit principles: • Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam • Contemplation in Action • Academic Excellence • Educating the Whole Person • “Cura Personalis” • Faith and Justice • Women & Men for Others • Interreligious Understanding • Community in Diversity • Touchstones: • Cura Personalis • Educating the whole person • Excellence • Integration • Social Justice • Paradox as principle • Advocacy & Community Building • “In Dreams Begins Responsibility” • Faith: framework of possibilities
(Re)Framing • “How does it feel to be a problem?” (DuBois) • From a state of woundedness to a place of wholeness
Signposts: Excellence Integration Social Justice Community Building Pathways: Passion/compassion Dialogue Principle of paradox Dancing through the minefields FramingLGBTQ : as center and circle
Excellence • As educational principle • As student success • As intellectual development & emotional intelligence • As critical, Catholic thinking • As diverse understandings of diversity
Integration • “Only to connect” • Institutional & individual levels • Identity is holistic • Being all of who we are
Social Justice • Relation to Jesuit life principles • Educational goal • LGBT as part of social justice
Community Building • Individual & group development • Importance of others • Advocacy is not leadership
Programming:Accomplishments & Challenges • Work with students • Work with Faculty & Staff • Work with Alumni
Working with the LGBTQ Student Organization • The work of the Center • The work of GU Pride • Campus celebrations • Coming Out Week • Pride Week • Gender Liberation Week • Sex Positive Week • Intersections
Orientations & Trainings:Campus-wide partnerships • Stakeholders across campus • Range of pre-orientation, orientation, and leadership programs • The truth in being everywhere • The “diversity corner”: reframing the conversation • The power of unlikely partners • Recruitment, yield, retention, and student success
Institutionalizing LGBTQ Work:Creating Spaces for Conversation Academics The Sacred & The Sexual: Speaker Series Lavender Graduation
Faculty & Staff • Campus Committee • Policies & Benefits • Academic Integration
Alums: Returning Home • John Carroll, Homecoming, Reunion • Alumni Relations • Office of Advancement
Countenancing • There is no other subject on which the average mind is so much confused as the subject of tolerance and intolerance. Tolerance is always supposed to be desirable because it is taken to be synonymous with broadmindedness. Intolerance is always supposed to be undesirable, because it is taken to be synonymous with narrow-mindedness. This is not true, for tolerance and intolerance apply to two totally different things. Tolerance applies only to persons, but never to principles. Intolerance applies only to principles, but never to persons. We must be tolerant to persons because they are human; we must be intolerant about principles because they are divine. [Archbishop Sheen]
Proceeding from tension and contradiction to paradox and mystery