Conditional Cash Transfers for Improving Utilization of Health Services

1. Conditional Cash Transfers for Improving Utilization of Health Services Health Systems Innovation Workshop Abuja, January 25th-29th, 2010

2. Conditional Cash Transfers (CCTs) • Cash transfers are conditioned when in addition to satisfying a selection criteria, beneficiaries are required to regularly undertake some pre-specified action • CCTsGovernment programs that transfer cash to poor families on the condition that those families make investments in human capital, usually: • Sending children to school regularly • Taking children to regular health and nutrition check ups

3. For example –Colombia • The program transfers about US$40 per month (about 30% of household consumption) to extremely poor families with children less than 18 living in rural areas • To receive the transfers: • Children 6-18 have to attend school regularly (85%) • Children less than 6 have to be taken to health centers every two (0-1) or six months (2-5). • Transfer has two parts: • A single transfer if the family has children less than 5 • Additional transfers for every school age child

4. Objectives • Two broad objectives: • Short-term: support household consumption/income protection • Mid-term: accumulate human capital and break the intergeneration transmission of poverty • Specific objectives depend on the defined sector goals (e.g., schooling, health status, nutrition)

5. Rationale • Cash Transfers to • Help poor families to access basic services • Create incentives to change behaviors • CCTs reach their long-term goals by boosting demand for specific social services • Therefore, CCTs make sense only if supply of social services is available for, and reachable by beneficiaries

6. Some results

7. CCTs are effective to reach the poorest…

8. ….help them to improve their consumption • Colombia: higher consumption of proteins (milk, meat, eggs) and cereals; and children cloths. No evidence of additional consumption of alcohol or goods for adults • In Brazil, 60% of the transfer spent in food; in 75% of families enhanced variety of food, increased the number of meals, and improved quality of food (more proteins).

9. CCTs assisted families to use health facilities for their children… • Growth monitoring check ups • México (+30-60%), Nicaragua (29%), Honduras (+12-20%), Colombia (+23-30%) • Visit to clinics • Colombia: (+30% (0-2), +50% (2-4)), Honduras (+20%) • Pre-natal check ups: • México (+6%), Honduras (+19%), Brazil (+6%)

10. …helping to reduce stunting… • In México, beneficiary children are 1cm taller than non-beneficiaries after 2 years • In Colombia and Nicaraguastunting among beneficiaries is 6.9 and 5.3 percentage points lower • In Brazil, after two years of exposure to BolsaFamiliabirth weight is approximately 200 gms more among beneficiaries.

11. … and increase immunization coverage • Colombia: +9% (DPT3) • Honduras: +7% (DPT3) • Nicaragua: +18% (full) • Turkey: +14% (full) (difference between beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries)

12. Beneficiaries receive payment Program authorizes payments Key implementation issues: TheCCTbasiccycle Beneficiaries comply with conditions Program objectives and expected outcomes Define target population Selection of beneficiaries Program monitors and verify compliance Registry of beneficiaries (and information system) Define conditionalities

13. Targeting • Selecting beneficiaries of the program • Depends on the objectives of the program and the conditions • Windows of opportunities • How • Geographical • At household level (Proxy means tested) • Community participation

14. Conditionality • Simple • Easy to understand by beneficiaries • Easy to monitor • Linked to transfer

15. Registry of Beneficiaries • At the core of the program • Data base with all the information of all beneficiaries (surveys) • Needs to be updated • Basis for monitoring compliance with conditions and authorizing payments

16. Verification of conditionalities • Central issue to a CCT program • May be difficult and expensive, but critical for the credibility and impact of the program • Close coordination between Ministries and implementing agencies • Following and support to families that fail to comply

17. Information • CCT programs require a careful management of information • Large CCT programs require to manage considerable amount of information regularly (e.g., Brazil -10m payments per month; Mexico: 5m payments every two months) • Information of compliance with conditions • Information on non-compliant families

18. Benefits and payments • Single transfer per family or per eligible member • High enough to be an incentive • Low enough to avoid interfering in household decisions on labor options • Frequency is key to keep families aware of conditionality and change behaviors • Clear definition and application of consequences for families that fail to comply

19. Other implementation issues • Institutional coordination (horizontal and vertical) • Transparency in the operation: using banking system to transfer cash to families • Community feedback • Monitoring and evaluation to adjust program • Exit and link with other strategies

20. Gradual expansion • Most programs started from small and simple interventions… • Only selected areas • Straightforward and simple conditions • Categorical targeting • … for several reasons… • Lack of supply of social services, • Institutional capacity at central and local level • Adjust the program and ensure credibility • … and nationwide expansion is a mid-term process (if at all)

21. Size of the program Annual program budget as % of GDP

22. Amount of the benefit % of household consumption

23. Concluding remarks • Start simple but complete • CCT instruments to reach its goals • Targeting • Conditionalities • Benefits • Critical elements • Available supply of services • Regular monitoring of compliance • Information