1 / 34

Infrastructure for Promotion of eLearning in Korea

eLearning Russia 2010, Moscow, June 3 rd – 4 th , 2010. Infrastructure for Promotion of eLearning in Korea. June 3 rd , 2010. Dae Joon Hwang, Ph. D. Professor of School of Information and Communication Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea

mahala
Download Presentation

Infrastructure for Promotion of eLearning in Korea

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. eLearning Russia 2010, Moscow, June 3rd – 4th, 2010 Infrastructure for Promotion of eLearning in Korea June 3rd, 2010 Dae Joon Hwang, Ph. D. Professor of School of Information and Communication Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea * Former President of Korea Education and Research Information Service(KERIS) djhwang@skku.edu eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  2. Summary • Introduction • eLearning Business • eLearning Best Practice in Education • Current Issues on eLearning • Conclusions eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  3. I. Introduction I eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  4. Overview of eLearning in Korea • eLearning business in revenue : $2.09B • eLearning in schools : 76.8% • Primary (83.5%), Secondary(76.6%), High(67.8%), Junior High(45.1%) • HE : Junior college(57.6%), 4Yr University(77.5%), Cyber University(100%), Open university(85%) • Strategy of HRD • Gov. official training: 517,700(‘08) • Job training: 1.55M명(‘08) cf. 20,000(1999) • Teacher training: 130,000/year • Legal foundations : Primary and Secondary Education law, HE law, LLL law, • Presidential decree, IPR protection law, Privacy protection law, eLearning • Industry Promotion law, e-Training in Labor Education Law • eLearning quality management: • Establishment guidelines : Cyber university, eLearning institutes • QA guidelines : CHLS, Regional eLearning e-Teacher training, Cyber university, eLearning institutes • Certification guidelines : content and SW for education and training • Overall satisfactionof eLearning : Cost saving(4.1/5) > Learning time(3.82/5)> System stability(3.8/5) > Content quality(3.72/5) > Diversity(3.68/5)> Learning effect(3.4/5) eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  5. eLearning Strategy of Government • eLearning policy • Nurture eLearning as core business in knowledge based economy • Provide equal opportunity for diminishing digital, education, and social divides • Tools for training human resources • eLearning infrastructure : CHLS, HE institutes, Cyber universities, eLearning institutes, eLearning training centers • Government support • Pay back of tuition by Employment Insurance • Host export exhibitions and show cases for strategic regions • National SW Awards • Adopt international open standards • Financial support to create oversea market and promote export • KOTRA provide Korean industry with the right information in the target region eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  6. eLearning Ecosystem eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  7. Legal Foundations of eLearning Life Long Education Law Protection Law of Intellectual Property Right Primary and Secondary Education Law Higher Education Law eLearning Industry Promotion Law Establishment guidelines QA guidelines Act of Promotion of Job Training Presidential Decree No. 20942 Privacy Protection Law Act of promotion of Government officials training eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  8. Issues on eLearning • Seachanges in education policy : data based -> evidence based • Adoptionof web 2.0 notions: education, learning, research, and governance • Status of eLearning : Learning method -> a pillar of competence development • Evolution of Learning Management System • LMS -> PLE -> CWE • Types of learning : LMS centric -> SNS centric • Participation, Openness, and SNW highly valued • Enhancement of EQL : Learning Design, e-Portfolio management • Adoption of International Open standards: IMS CC and LTI, LOM, SCORM, OKI, Korea28%(16.7%, SCORM) • Encourage use of Open Sources : OER, OSS, OCW, Korea18% • Content : Open Educational Resource : MITOCW, Curriki, GLOBE, OpernLearn) • OSS : sourceforge.com, OBRR(Open Source Business Readiness Rating) • Strengthen global partnership in eLearning : JV, ISP, Consulting, Funding(ODA, EDCF) eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  9. Utilization of International Standards • Major standard in Korean industry is SCORM and ISO • What int’l standards used : • SCORM: widely used since 2004 • KEM: KEM 7001, 7003 are available since 2005 • IMS-CC: under adoption since 2009 (unit: %) Adoption Ratio of Company Adoption Ratio of Int’l Standards None eLearning business ISO KS-7001(KEM) SCORM Service 23.4 13.6 1.9 10.7 76.6 1.6 Content 23.8 66.4 33.6 13.1 5.7 20.8 56.6 43.4 17.0 Solution 2.2 16.7 27.9 12.0 72.1 Total * Source:「 2009 Survey of eLearning Industry」NIPA, March 2010, http//www.kiec.or.kr MESI-Jun2009-DJ.Hwang

  10. I II. eLearning Business eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  11. eLearning Cooperation Triangle • Create Job • training market • Support • Employment • Insurance • Customer ‘s market • Best practice • Pilot test-bed Legalfoundation Ministry of Education and S&T Ministry of Labor Ministry of Knowledge Economy • Promote eLearning industry • Support eLearning technology development • Promote export of eLearning products and service eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  12. Growth of eLearning Markets eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  13. eLearning Supply Market • Average annual growth ratio (in revenue): 5.4% during 2005 - 2009 • $1.47B(‘05) , 1.62B(‘06) , 1.73B(‘07), $1.87B(‘08), $2.09B(‘09) • Business category of eLearning: service, content, and solution • Market growth in revenue : 11.8% increase in 2009 • Service business leads the supply market : $1.39B • Company average: $1.53M Business Category 2008 2009 YoY(%) Average Revenue/Company Revenue (Unit: $1 M) Ratio (%) Revenue Ratio (%) (Unit: $1 M) 66.4 14.2 1.54 1,389 Service 1,216 65.0 23.5 23.1 Content 13.4 1.57 491 433 10.1 Solution 11.9 1.39 -4.5 211 221 Total 11.8 100.0 100.0 1.53 2,091 1,870 * Source: Survey of the eLearning Industry in Korea, NIPA, 2009, http//www.nipa.or.kr eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  14. eLearning Demand Market • Total revenue in 2009 : $2.07B • Average annual growth ratio in revenue: 11% • $1.7B(‘07) expanded to $2.07B(‘09) • Individual leads the eLearning demand market since 2008 (unit: USD 1 M) 2008 2007 2009 Groups of Category Avg. Growth Ratio Ratio (%) Ratio (%) Ratio (%) Revenue (Unit: $1 M) Revenue (Unit: $1 M) Revenue (Unit: $1 M) Individual 45.6% 15.7% 816 43.7% 42.6% 735 945 760 Corporation 886 42.8% 43.5% 44.0% 812 9.1% Regular Education Institutions 70 4.0% 96 4.7% 36.2% 71 3.8% Public Institutions 163 9.4% 144 6.9% -14.0% 167 9.0% 1,728 100.0% 1,866 100.0% 11.0% Total 2,072 100.0% * Source: Survey of the eLearning Industry in Korea, NIPA, 2010, http//www.nipa.or.kr eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  15. Analysis of Individual eLearner 2008(%) 2009(%) Category 2007(%) Growth Ratio(%) Total 39.4 45.0 3.3 48.3 45.8 47.6 2.8 50.4 Male Gender 31.5 41.9 4.2 Female 46.1 67.0 70.9 1.1 72.0 6- 19 50.7 61.3 1.3 62.6 20-29 27.2 30.5 40.8 Age Group 30-39 10.3 23.4 29.6 2.1 31.7 40-49 11.2 13.5 4.9 18.4 More than 50 61.3 70.3 -7.6 62.7 Pre/Elementary Educational Background 65.6 64.5 19.7 Middle 84.2 77.4 High 81.2 9.3 90.5 0.9 69.5 University, Graduate School 69.3 70.2 66.8 70.5 Student Vocational Background Professional Clerical 43.5 48.8 Service/ Production 16.1 NA 22.4 NA 10.0 10.5 Housewife 21.1 26.5 Jobless * Source: Survey of the eLearning Industry in Korea, NIPA, 2010, http//www.nipa.or.kr eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  16. III. eLearning Best Practice in Education eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  17. Cyber Home Learning System • Allow students to have equal • opportunity for learning • Provide students with • opportunities for seamless learning • Reduce private tutoring expenses • Enhance quality of public • education 8,218 2.2 M Cyber Teacher Tutor 1:1 Learning Management Major Services Career Path Counseling Customized Learning Level Assessment Q&A • Student-centered • Blending of learning • and education LMS / LCMS (SCORM 2004) • Curriculum-based • Supplementary Knowledge DB Content Repository eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  18. Integration of Standards with CHLS Content CHLS LMS Learner • SCORM RTE (Data Model & API) • Content Packaging • Simple Sequencing & Navigation • Metadata (KEM, KS-7001) eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  19. How to Operate CHLS : by 16 MPOEs 16 MPOEs run their own CHLS with common design guideline, which are networked nationwide through KERIS Resource Management Window Learning Design Window RestructureManagement Window Learning Resource Configuration Window eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  20. Three Types of Learning Design Models Provide teachers with guided LD models with SCORM content packaging Basic model Intro Pre requisite Main study Summary Further Study Selection model Intro Main study Evaluation Summary Pre requisite Supplemen-tary Study Pre requisite Intro Main study Evaluation Summary Sequencing model For implementation of branching, assessment results and Learner’s decisions are considered. Selection model is the most popular eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  21. Impacts of Cyber Home Learning System: Learner achievement • More interested in subjects : 32.5% • Enhanced self-motivated study habit : 25.3 % • Confidence gained in problem solving : 20.7 % • Overall improvement in grades : 20.1 % eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  22. Impact s of CHLS in Cost Saving Extra Cost Savings ( unit : USD ) Replacing private tutoring opportunity • Those students who have and are willing to quit private tutoring : 12.9% (6,275 in numbers) • $22.8 expected to save : 6,275 students * $300 USD * 12 months, where $300 is the average monthly payment for private tutoring cf) Total private tutoring expenses : $42 B in 2009 eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  23. IV. Current Issues on eLearning eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  24. Issues on eLearning Technologies • Emerge new type of digital contents and alternative learning platforms • eBook(Book + adaptive tutors + open content + simulations)-> Integration of eLearning business and publishing business • eBooks as a new learning platforms • Need to support collaborative and social learning • More attentions to learning technology standardization : W3C, IMS CC, and LTI • Must respond to the customer’s voices on quality of learning outcomes • Accommodate device mobility and diversity • Use of OSS and OER in education becomes globally popular • Cloud computing affects eLearning business ecosystem : cost reduction, smart sourcing eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  25. Innovations of Content Providers • Books + Adaptive Tutors + Open Content + Simulations *source : IMS GLC Overview, 2009 eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  26. Adoption of Int’l eLearning Standards • Challenging issues to catch up transition web 2.0 era: eLearning 2.0, education 2.0, research 2.0, governance 2.0, etc…. • eLearning industry and government of Korea recognize importance of eLearning standards for global collaboration and creating business in global markets • HE institutes concerns more about adoption of Int’l Open Standards to challenge LTI issues and reasoning issues on sustainability in ICT investment : ISO, IEC, IMS, CEN, IEEE • Learning Design and e-Portfolio management draw more attentions from academia and industry eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  27. Global eLearning Standardization System IMS Specs(de Facto Standards) ISO Specs(de Jour Standards) Proposal • Countries/Publ Insts.: 10 • Universities/Ed Insts: 30 • Companies: 60 • Specs: 21Documents, • 100items • Countries: 28 • Specs : 11Documents, • 23 items Collaboration ... • * IMS Global Learning Consortium : International non-profit organization • * ISO/IEC JTC1 SC36 : Information Technology for Learning, Education, and Training (ITLET) • * CEN : European Committee for Standardization • * IEEE LTSC • ADL :SCORM • * Sources: IMS Global 2009 eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  28. Learning Technology Interoperability among Multiple LMS * Source: IMS Global 2009 eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  29. Issues on OER • Establishing nationwide OER repository under discussion through participation from broadcasting stations and national institutions • OER, and OSS draws much attentions from academia and public in Korea • Education institutes are encouraged to use OER for enhancing quality of education/learning and ROI in education • KOCW as a member of GLOBE has been leading OER movement in Korea • International cooperation of OSS among Korea, Japan, and China began since 2000: eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  30. GLOBE Partnership • ARIADNE: Collaboration among University Teaching and Learning Service Center • Katholiek Universiteit Leuven (KUL) • University of Lausanne (UNIL) • Université Joseph Fourier's Centre d'Autoformation et d'Innovation Multimedia (UJF-CAFIM) • Université Paul Sabatier's Informatics and Telecom Research Institute and the Toulouse Campus • Computing Centre (UPS-IRIT/CICT) • Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral (ESPOL) • EDNA : education.au.limited • Leads OER in education institutions : Primary and secondary education, HE, and LLE • Operation in cooperation with private and non profit organization • EUN: European Schoolnet • Organized by Ministry of Education of EU member country : Denmark, France, Norway, Italy • LORNET: Organization of 6 Institutes in Canada • Tele university • Simon Fraser University • University of Saskatchewan • University of Waterloo • University of Ottawa • Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal • JOCW • Keio University • WIDE University • Shinshu University • MERLOT: OER community of U.C. California • Types of Membership: Person, Institution • KERIS, Korea • NIME, Japan eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  31. Issues on Learning Design • Provide content developers and teachers with various learning design models to • enhance eLearning quality through their active participation • Establish nationwide repository of LD models and best practices to encourage sharing of experience among teachers and content developers • Encourage use of OSS tools in classroom B A C eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  32. V. Conclusions eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  33. Conclusions • Policy • Nurture eLearning as a strategic business of knowledge based economy • Coordinated approaches to support promotion of eLearning among private, public, and • education sectors • Motivate eLearning industry to create eLearning markets in abroad with government • support • eLearning Quality management • Learning Design and e-Portfolio draw attentions • More concerns about outcome and context from learner’s perspective • Strengthen application of QA guidelines to operation, content, service, and staff • Encourage OER use and International Open standards • Focuses on global collaboration and competence of HE institutes and eLearning industry • More concerns about ROI in education • Technology Innovation • Technology innovation to maximize mobility : u-Learning, m-Learning, content packing, • eBook as learning platform • Interoperability among multiple learning platforms • Recognize science of learning as the core part of future education innovation • Need attentions to cloud computing emerging new business model eLearningRussia2010_Moscow

  34. eLearning Russia 2010, Moscow, June 3rd – 4th, 2010 감사합니다 Thank You Dae Joon Hwang Ph. D. Prof., Sungkyunkwan University, Korea djhwang@skku.edu

More Related