410 likes | 570 Views
CERIF in Action (CIA). Synthesise, standardise and productionise CERIF for Higher Education Institutions. Anna Clements Enterprise Architect, University of St Andrews akc@st-andrews.ac.uk. Scott Brander Project Manager, University of St Andrews scott.brander@st-andrews.ac.uk.
E N D
CERIF in Action (CIA) Synthesise, standardise and productionise CERIF for Higher Education Institutions
Anna Clements Enterprise Architect, University of St Andrews akc@st-andrews.ac.uk Scott Brander Project Manager, University of St Andrews scott.brander@st-andrews.ac.uk CERIF Workshop, Bristol, 27-28th June 2012
Agenda • Aim of the project • Partners and use cases • Progress
Aim of the Project “ … to consolidate existing work [at the UK National level] using CERIF to explore the possibilities of two-way data exchange by producing a stable, reusable system for real-time exchange between two or more live organisational systems using CERIF.”
The National (UK) Perspective National investment – JISC
The National (UK) Perspective • Report identifying CERIF as the best option for improving interoperability and exchange of research information • Cycle of investment in CERIF projects is leading to the evolution of a standard CERIF implementation • CIA first step towards a truly interoperable CERIF-XML • Entities, semantics, identifiers
The National (UK) Perspective (cont.) • Growth in procurement of CERIF Research Information Systems • 0 to 30% in 3 years • Funders and other bodies engaging with and implementing standard • Consistency vital if CERIF to support national research base • CIA will help with maintaining consistency of implementation
The European Perspective euroCRIS Membership
Agenda • Aim of the project • Partners and use cases • Progress
Use Cases Between institutions Uploading to Research Outcomes System Exchanging data between partner institutions e.g. when an researcher moves to a new Institution. Uploading grant-level information to RCUK 1 2 CERIF Workshop, Bristol, 27-28th June 2012
Benefits of CIA approach Stakeholder Perspectives
Scope of CIA Major Entities
Scope of CIA Systems
Agenda • Aim of the project • Partners and use cases • Progress
Project Timelines November 2011 – October 2012 Workshop
Project Progress Phase One • Review existing CERIF models • JISC-funded • Other relevant projects • Similarities and differences in approach • Issues and how solved • Vocabularies used • Existence or lack of authority data sources
Comparison of Projects Phase One
CERIF Issues Identifiers • Unique person IDs … so many ways • CRISPool: Person-[UKPRN]-[PersonInstId] • IRIOS: Generated UUIDs • CERIFy: Employee ID from Incites
CERIF Issues Data model • Preferred Author Name • Person Publication Link is made on an identifier • ∴ unable to identify preferred author name for a publication
CERIF Issues Other Identifiers and semantics • Other identifiers • Institutional (e.g. user name) • External (e.g. HESA, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science IDs) • Personal / Honorific Titles • Organisation Types • Different organisations have different structures (e.g. funders) • Each HEI even has different structures
CERIF-XML Version 1.4 … towards v2 • Fragmentation of V1.3 • Resource intensive (data about an entity was held in up to 10 XML files) • Scalability issues • Structure couldn’t natively represent complexity required.
Project Progress Phase Two 1 • Academic user logs into Symplectic Elements • Chooses export to CERIF-XML • Saves XML file 1 2 2
Project Progress User uploads CERIF-XML file 1 Elements assists user with review of person and publication data found in XML file 2
Project Progress User can optionally review new … 1 … and matched publications found in CERIF-XML 2
Project Progress 1 2
Project Progress 1 2
Project Progress 1 2
Project Progress 1 2
Project Progress 1 2
Project Progress 1 2
Project Progress 1 2
Roadmap Survey to gauge … • Current situation: • Quantifying time/cost to enter data • Uploading information to ROS • Future: • Extending use cases beyond CIA entities
What happens next The Roadmap • ROS Survey - w/c 18th June • CIA Survey – circa 1st July
Surveys Various stakeholders • Research Administrators • Researchers • Investigators (PIs/Co-PIs) • Suppliers • Research Funders • Funding Councils • IT Support staff
Project Blog bit.ly/cerifinaction
Summary of expected benefits • Considerable expansion in use of CERIF-XML • Involvement of software providers and key funder – RCUK • Efficiency improvements across the sector • Considerable improvement in data quality and availability
Conclusions & Summary But need for … • Unambiguous identification of entities • Recognised authority data sources • Agreed standard lists (e.g. research funders) • Improving awareness of CERIF and its multiple benefits • Additional CERIF documentation • Case studies • Evidence of benefits
And almost finally … Iconography R B
… and finally Chaos in Action CERIF in Action
Thank you • Any questions? More information: http://bit.ly/cerifinaction CERIF Workshop, Bristol, 27-28th June 2012