1 / 20

Asset Management

Asset Management. Ohio GIS Conference September 2013 Presented by: Kim Christian – GIS Director Licking County Engineer’s Office. What We Knew . LAND AREA: 688 SQ. MI. – 3RD LARGEST IN OHIO 421 C/L MILES 393 BRIDGES (275 NBIS) 1,800 CULVERTS 5,000+ SIGNS

mahsa
Download Presentation

Asset Management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Asset Management Ohio GIS Conference September 2013 Presented by: Kim Christian – GIS Director Licking County Engineer’s Office

  2. What We Knew • LAND AREA: 688 SQ. MI. – 3RD LARGEST IN OHIO • 421 C/L MILES • 393 BRIDGES (275 NBIS) • 1,800 CULVERTS • 5,000+ SIGNS • 10 RAILROAD CROSSINGS (at grade) • CURRENT NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES: 44 • HIGHWAY WORKERS: 1988 58 2012 36 • Crash Rates • 2009 Ranked 3rd Statewide in Runoff Road Crash Rates

  3. Goals of the Project • Roadway Feature Inventory • Deficiency Inventory • Track Deficiency Reduction Trends • Create County Work Plan • Create Maintenance Budgeting Tool • Correlate Deficiencies to Crash Records • Correlate Deficiency Reduction • to Crash Mitigation • Provide Maintenance Record • Database

  4. Licking County Previous CEAO High Crash Location Study performed by HDR will be used to Correlate Deficiency Reduction to Crash Mitigation

  5. SCOPE OF WORK • Locations, Condition and Assessment of the • Following: • Guardrail • Pavement Markings • Signs • Hazards • Ball Bank • No Passing Zone • Culverts • Meaningful Data Naming Convention

  6. Data Collection • Collected more than 10,700 features in approximately 6 months (421 centerline miles of county road) • 530 Guardrail Segments • 421 mi Pavement Markings • 8900 Signs • 1100 Unprotected Hazards • 150 Curves • 75 No Passing Zones

  7. Data Collection • Guardrail • Offset, Condition, Length, Type, Maintenance • Signs • Location, Code, Condition, Retro, Field Photo, Associated Support • Hazards • Ditches, Embankments, Culverts, Rocks, Trees, Structures, Pavement Drop-offs, Poles • Reasonable assessment of “Hazard” • Recommendation

  8. Data Collection (cont’d) • Ball Bank • Per ODOT Traffic Engineering Manual, Section 1213-2 • Curves with Advisory Speeds or Unmarked Curves • No Passing Zones • Per MUTCD Guidelines • Curves, Intersections, Railroad, Bridges, Transitions, etc.

  9. Licking County Maintenance Zones • County Divided into 5 Maintenance Zones • Divided by Roadways, not Township Boundaries

  10. Software

  11. Software

  12. Software

  13. Rankings • Standards set for each asset • e.g., Pavement Condition Rating • Based Loosely on ODOT Rating Criteria • Simplified for the County To 1-5 Scale

  14. Budgeting • Planning for future needs • Track asset costs

  15. Crashes • Tie to hazards • Show improvement trends

  16. Maintenance Records • Field Data Entry • Associated roadway item information (sign, guardrail) • Work required • Completion Data • Field Photo • Google Earth Fly-in Link

  17. Maintenance Records • Follow-up Work • Query data to provide decision information • Develop initial maintenance plans

  18. Maintenance Records • Most Difficult Part of Database • Who will update? • Field Techs vs. Office Staff • Update Methods • Paperwork • Field Data Entry – Laptop, Tablet • Geo-coded Picture

  19. Maintenance Zones • Between Townships/Districts • Track work and improvement

  20. QUESTIONS? For additional information, contact: Kim Christian (740) 670-5299 kchristian@lcounty.com

More Related