1 / 16

Dynamic Electron Injection for Improved IEC-POPS Operation

11 th US-Japan IEC Workshop. Dynamic Electron Injection for Improved IEC-POPS Operation. Yongho Kim, Aaron McEvoy, and Hans Herrmann Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM October 12, 2009. Outline. Periodically Oscillating Plasma Sphere By R. Nebel and J. Park

maia-dorsey
Download Presentation

Dynamic Electron Injection for Improved IEC-POPS Operation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 11th US-Japan IEC Workshop Dynamic Electron Injection for Improved IEC-POPS Operation Yongho Kim, Aaron McEvoy, and Hans Herrmann Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM October 12, 2009

  2. Outline • Periodically Oscillating Plasma Sphere • By R. Nebel and J. Park • Research Motivation and Goal • Space charge neutralization by dynamic electron injection • Experimental Approaches • Ramping emitter bias • POPS frequency feedback • Summary

  3. Negative Electrostatic Potential Well (= Virtual Cathode Mode) • Symmetric injection of electrons into a transparent spherical anode • Previous work • 1954 Wells • 1956 Farnsworth • 1959 Elmore • 1968 Hirsh • 1973 Swanson • Advantage of VC mode • Perfect ion confinement • High density & high kinetic energy at the center 1959 Elmore, etc

  4. Periodically Oscillating Plasma Sphere (POPS, by D. Barnes and R. Nebel) • Harmonic potential with uniform density • External electron injection • Constant density electron background in a sphere • Spherical harmonic potential well for ions • Phase lock with external modulation • Ions created by ionization and oscillate radially in the well • Same frequency, regardless of amplitude (harmonic oscillator) • POPS frequency for ions

  5. Outer grid Inner grid Electron emitter Emissive probe Experimental Setup for POPS • 6 Electron Emitters • Dispenser cathode type • Square-pulse bias voltage (~ 10 ms) • Spherical Grids • Outer grid: control electron density profile • Inner grid: confinement, 1 cm spacing (vs. Debye length ~ 1.8 cm) • RF modulation to inner grid to excite POPS oscillation and phase-lock • Emissive probe • floating potential and its time variation • Low operating pressure (1×10-6 torr) • Fill gas: He, H2, and Neon Diagram of LANL IEC device

  6. Near Harmonic Potential Observed • Average electron density in the well ~ 3.3×106 cm-3 • Off-peak radial density profile: stable profile from fluid dynamics standpoint

  7. POPS Resonance Measurement • Variation in virtual cathode decay time with rf oscillation of the inner grid bias. • POPS Resonance (@350 kHz) and 1/2 harmonic observed (expected from Mathieu equation). • Resonance frequency independent of outer grid and extractor grid bias.

  8. Scaling of POPS Frequency • 3 ion species (H2+, He+ and Ne+) have been used. • Resonance frequency exhibit Vwell1/2 scaling • Resonance frequency exhibit 1/(ion mass)1/2 scaling • POPS frequency calculation with rVC =rgrid (no free parameter) • Excellent agreement with theoretical calculations (in absolute values)

  9. Motivation of Present Work: Virtual Cathode Instability was Observed • Stability limit: (1) (1) (2) (2) • Gradual well depth decrease

  10. Proper Space-charge Neutralization is required to maintain Virtual Cathode Before Compression After Compression • 1D particle code shows that insufficient space-charge neutralization distorts the plasma potential well • Ramping electron injection during compression phase is proposed ni ~ 106/cc ni ~ 108/cc ne ~ 107/cc ne ~ 107/cc ni ne ni > ne

  11. Ramping Electron Injection will neutralize Ion built up Solid-State Marx Modulator architecture Proprietary LANL technology (ISR-6) High efficiency & fault tolerant Modular and scalable design Prototype Pulsed Power System Operate 50 Hz to 1 kHz Reliable & Long lifetime Modulator Specifications • 10 stage solid-state Marx modulator • Fiber-optic trigger control system

  12. Preliminary Power Supply Test Short pulse test Long pulse test High duty ration test Arbitrary voltage controller voltage channels

  13. Improved Virtual Cathode Feedback Control • POPS frequency feedback tuning to adjust applied RF-frequency to match changing potential well depth Frequency tuning to match gradual decay of virtual cathode

  14. Virtual Cathode Dynamics are Studied using a 2D PIC Code 10 [cm] Injection electron current : 1 [A] Injection electron energy : 300 [eV] Transparent anode Φ=300[V] Injection boundary Φ=0[V]

  15. Space-charge limited Virtual Cathode might be more stable Injection electron current : 0.1 [A] Injection electron energy : 150 [eV] Injection electron current : 1 [A] Injection electron energy : 150 [eV] • At high electron injection current (1 A), space-charge limited virtual cathode was calculated. • If the plasma has a deep potential well then the electron energy might not be greater than the ion temperature, which is favorable to the stability of virtual cathode.

  16. Summary • Objective of present work is to enhance virtual cathode stability • Dynamic electron injection was proposed to compensate ion accumulation at the center of potential well (  quasi-neutral limit). • Ramping emitter bias voltage will maintain ne > ni and avoid instability. • Feedback POPS frequency control will phase-lock POPS and extend virtual cathode lifetime. • CELESTE (2D PIC) code is used to study virtual cathode stability.

More Related