1 / 33

Frankfort City Comprehensive Plan Meeting, September 28, 2006

Frankfort City Comprehensive Plan Meeting, September 28, 2006. Mark-Up Draft 2 As directed from 8-23-06. Revisions Draft 1 --> Draft 2. 1 volume to 2 164 pp to 249 pp Volume I Text [118 pp] Volume II Appendices [131 pp]. Shift [Volume I to Volume II].

maia
Download Presentation

Frankfort City Comprehensive Plan Meeting, September 28, 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Frankfort City Comprehensive PlanMeeting, September 28, 2006 Mark-Up Draft 2 As directed from 8-23-06

  2. Revisions Draft 1 --> Draft 2 • 1 volume to 2 • 164 pp to 249 pp • Volume I Text [118 pp] • Volume II Appendices [131 pp]

  3. Shift [Volume I to Volume II] • 84 pp shift [164 pp to 80 pp in Volume I] • Shift by Content: • PART I Introduction: All of Indiana Code and local process of updating the comprehensive plan • PART II Community Profile: Virtually all • PART III Growth management: Definition of Land Uses • PART VIII Economic Revitalization: All of Economic Analysis • PART IX Access: Location & Design of thoroughfares • NOTE WELL: Issue of whether we have a Thoroughfare Plan on Slide 8

  4. 2. Added Sections [Vol. I] • Executive Summary [handout] – 7 pp • Summary Conclusions – 18 pp • Actions: executive and legislative • PART III • Planned Development/ Performance Zoning/ Inclusionary Development Standards • Future Land Use Map • Thoroughfare Plan Map to PART IX • Summaries of Sections added to Vol. II

  5. 2. Added Sections [Vol. II] • Historic [past 50 years – last Comp Plan] • Population • Dwelling units • Work Force • Forecasts [population] • 2005-2010 • 2010-2015 • 2015-2025 • 8 scenarios + target [Frankfort till 2010, then Lebanon] • Hydrology/ Stormwater Management Plan • Full graphics to Thoroughfare Plan

  6. Missing Elements • Future Land Use Map [detailed platted] • Infrastructure [utility] Plan • Airport Plan [pending] • Multicultural Plan • instead… a call for a Mayor’s Task Force • Thoroughfare Plan lacks bicycle lanes These are presented today.

  7. Draft 3 • Draft 2 remains only as online version • Official Plan • “The Comprehensive Plan of the City of Frankfort, IN” • Plan for legislative and executive action • 30-50 pp • Grows from Executive Summary • 7 policy areas • Add key maps and charts • No Executive Summary, No Summary Conclusion, much smaller Intro still [e.g., acknowledgements in Appendices] • Technical Appendices to Comprehensive Plan • As a reference document • 150-200 pp • Executive Summary • Stapled hand-out • 10 pp • As is with Future Land Use Map, key charts, graphic cover

  8. Issue of Volume II as Unofficial • If Thoroughfare Plan is Volume II [unofficial] • IC 36-7-4-502 [only 3 elements] and 503 [24 optional elements] • Thoroughfare Plan is optional under IC 36-7-4-503 (6) • Requirement for Thoroughfare Plan [all met in Vol. II]: • Location • Design • Priority for construction • IC 36-7-4-506[c] • After a thoroughfare plan has been included in the comprehensive plan, thoroughfares may be located, changed widened, straightened, or vacated only in the manner indicated by the comprehensive plan • If no manner is indicated, then must amend comprehensive plan • Propose Manner: • Plan Commission referral as initial consideration [60 days to resolve] and certification through adoption or amended adoption of Commission recommendation by City Council • City Engineer/ City Planner decide – an administrative function • City Plan Commission decides • NOTE: any official amendment to Comp Plan or its Thoroughfare Plan requires City Council certification

  9. TOC Draft 3

  10. Documents – frankfortonline.orgOn Library Reserve [2 copies]

  11. Schedule as Revised

  12. Changes in Draft 2 Historic Profile Growth Management

  13. Historic Profile

  14. Forecast 2005-2025Frankfort for 5 Years; Lebanon for 20 Years

  15. Population grows by 241 Dwelling Units grow by 93 2005-2010

  16. Population grows by 1,200 Dwelling Units grow by 462 2010-2015

  17. Population grows by 2,525 Dwelling Units grow by 971 2015-2025

  18. 2005-2025 • Population growth of 3,966 [24% on 16,432] • Added dwelling units of 1,525 • Growth Management!!!

  19. Hamilton County 11,142 pop. increase [68%] Another Scenario of Higher Growth

  20. 3 Options [1 recommended] • Location-specific districts for 100% of growth area • Site/ subdivision plan for 100% growth area • 2 districts + “blank slate” + specific regulations

  21. Future Land Use Map & Policies

  22. continued [1] National Recreation & Park Association sets standards, based on residential population generated by a development, for both developed [active recreation or other public use] and undeveloped [e.g., passive park] space. This excludes yard and setback requirements, buffers beyond the ROW, and storm water management areas and environmentally sensitive areas if not a park.

  23. Summary Future Land Use • Extension of conventional zoning in built-up areas • All planned developments in growth area [10,585 ac] • 2 location-specific districts • PBD at SR 28 and I 65 • OS [park, working landscapes, environmental protection] • Remaining land uses as “floating zones” regulated by zoning • OS = 30% outside planned developments + on-site requirements [15% plus higher in residential] • Estimate 44-47% OS in growth area • UGB enforced by County outside of Frankfort City limits

  24. Build-Out for Annexed Area Demonstrating Open Space

  25. Demonstrated in Acres

  26. Density in Units/ AcreResidential in DU’sNon-Residential in SF based on FARBased on “Net Developable” Acreage [Gross-OS]

  27. Calculated Build-Out

  28. Performance Zoning Minimum score for entitlement = 75 [?] Alternate is full discretion of Planning Commission as to points

  29. Missing Maps Draft 2 Bicycle Paths in Thoroughfare Plan Utilities Hydrology [stormwater] Airport Development Plan Future Land Use Map

  30. Bike Paths in Thoroughfare Plan

  31. Bicycle Transportation Policies • Connect to greenways and parks • Means for lockable parking • 6’ lanes and marked [solid white line + logo] • Motor vehicular speed and Buffers • 25 MPH in built-up areas • 40 MPH outside • > 40, then protective buffer • Accessible by bus [front rack] • Promote offices/ industries/ retail as “bicyclist-friendly” • Portland, OR, provision of lockers and showers • Frankfort as a “Cool City”

  32. Hypothetical Build-Out at Minimum [20%] residential and maximum other uses – Not a Future Land Use Map • OS = protecting stream bed, noise buffer near airport, SR 28 buffer, and park [need prime agric lands] • PBD = concentrated at key intersection [SR 28 / I 65] • PRD = mostly adjoining Jeffersonville • PCD = proximate to PRD’s • NOTE WELL: OS understated in that each planned development has an OS requirement

  33. Hypothetical Build-Out at Maximum [45%] residential and minimum other uses – Not a Future Land Use Map

More Related