1 / 19

Development of Evaluation Procedure for Effective Implementation of CDIO

Development of Evaluation Procedure for Effective Implementation of CDIO. Associate Professor Jørgen Christensen Associate Professor Carsten Rode Associate Professor Egil Borchersen. Curriculum changed. 1. Semester – The semester has been changed New on 1. semester:

maili
Download Presentation

Development of Evaluation Procedure for Effective Implementation of CDIO

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Development of Evaluation Procedure for Effective Implementation of CDIO Associate Professor Jørgen Christensen Associate Professor Carsten Rode Associate Professor Egil Borchersen

  2. Curriculum changed • 1. Semester – The semester has been changed • New on 1. semester: • Design Build – Building Energy • Building Energy

  3. Design Build Course – Building Energy Conceive Design Implement Operate DTU Byg

  4. Design Build course • The students had to build a model house in the scale 1:20 as a model of a realistic house • Include a measurement unit, which could be connected to an outside measuring instrument • Houses were placed on a plate of polystyrene in order to make the heat loss negligible.

  5. Examine the influence on energy consumption of: • Geometry of building • Material in climate shield • Insulation thickness • Windows etc.

  6. Examine the influence on energy consumption of: • The houses will be placed outside in November and a constant indoor temperature approx 20 degree will be maintained by electrical heat. • Temperature and amount of added heat will be measured. • Report the experience

  7. Effective implementation of CDIO • Goal is to effectivelyimplementCDIO practices • Reduce time for implementation • Evaluate the students’ view on the CDIO learning environment. • High response rate from the students – a two pagepaperinquiry form with 16 questions on the front page and possibilities for individual comments on the reverse side of the page • In addition to the paper inquiry form there was the traditional electronic inquiry at the CampusNet.

  8. Below you are requested to write at least one opinion of each of the following 3 items: • I appreciate: • I criticize: • I recommend: • If you want to, below you can add further information to the specific questions. Please note number of question if you wish to clarify something.

  9. 3. Did the lessons/project make you commit yourself? 75% gave the score 4 or 5 – 20% the average score 3

  10. 4. Did the teaching method of this course motivate you for added interest in studying constructional engineering? 74% gave the score 4 or 5 – 21% the average score 3

  11. 9. How was the teamwork in your group? 72% gave the score 4 or 5 – 13% the average score 3

  12. 16. How many hours a week did you work with the project in addition to the four scheduled project lessons? > 7 h/week ≥ 9 h/week • Paper form14% • Electronic form 64% • In the electronic form the question is: A 5 ECTS course is prescribed for 9 hours per week. I mean that my working load in the course is: Score 3 – 9 hours per week

  13. Response rate – Paper/electronic form • The two forms show significant difference in response rate. Total no. Students Attending • Paper form84% 100% • Electronic form 45% • Giving the paper inquiry form a far more representative value

  14. Conclusion • The implementation of CDIO is a year long process • Good material for the evaluation of the CDIO Design Build course • Input for improvement and effective practices • Results show a very high satisfaction with the Design Build course • The two forms show significant difference in response rate: Paper form – 84% Electronic form – 45% Paper inquiry form more representative!

  15. Thank you very muchfor your attention The girls also like to study this way !

More Related