160 likes | 282 Views
Decoding the time-lags in accreting black holes with XMM-Newton. Phil Uttley Thanks to: P. Cassatella, T. Wilkinson, J. Wilms, K. Pottschmidt, M. Hanke, M. Böck. Cyg X-1. Background: disc variability?.
E N D
Decoding the time-lags in accreting black holes with XMM-Newton Phil Uttley Thanks to: P. Cassatella, T. Wilkinson, J. Wilms, K. Pottschmidt, M. Hanke, M. Böck
Cyg X-1 Background: disc variability? 1974: Lightman & Eardley propose disc instability as the origin of X-ray variability in black hole XRBs But subsequent observations don’t seem to support this... mean (time-averaged) spectrum rms variability amplitude rms (time-varying) spectrum GX 339-4 Belloni et al. 2005 spectral hardness Variability generated by hot flow/corona? (Churazov et al. 2001) Done et al. (2007) Decreasing disc, increasing power-law
Hard state disc/corona interaction • Several physical components: cool (kT~0.2 keV) optically thick disc, hot optically thin corona, jets • Corona and disc see each other: reflection • Can study both disc thermal and power-law spectra and variability with XMM-Newton EPIC-pn timing mode
Disc X-ray reverberation • X-rays from the continuum source (corona, jet base?) hit the disc • Some are reflected (iron line and reflection continuum) • The absorbed fraction is thermalised and re-emitted at the local disc temperature ~1% of incident flux ~70% of incident flux ~30% of incident flux
GX 339-4 2004 observation 170 s of ~150 ks 0.5-0.9 keV 3-10 keV Both bands (disc+pl and pl only) show large amplitude strongly correlated variability!
GX 339-4 2004 hard state: Energy-dependent PSDs and frequency-resolved rms spectra 0.5-0.9 keV 3-10 keV slow fast Differences in PSD between hard and soft bands can be explained if variability is intrinsic to the disc and PL is correlated with it (Wilkinson & Uttley 2009)
Does the disc drive the power-law variability? (Uttley et al. 2011) Yes, at least below 1 Hz, reprocessing dominates observed disc variability > 1 Hz
XMM-Newton TOO programme 0.12-0.49 Hz Frequency Range
Variable disc or disc/hot-flow boundary? GX 339-4 2004: 0.034-0.12 Hz Range The sharpness of the change in lag below 2 keV requires that the leading component is almost a pure blackbody and not a blackbody plus a steep Comptonised component blackbody plus steep (Γ=3) power-law leads hard (Γ=1.4) power-law blackbody leads hard (Γ=1.6) power-law It really looks like the ‘standard’ accretion disc! the corona does not see a lot of the disc
Interpreting the variability: signals and amplifiers Signal: mdot fluctuations in disc Amplifier: X-ray emitting regions * Emission mdot Delay Time Input signal from disc is convolved with the emission vs. delay profile
The effect of the emission profile Emission profiles (transfer functions) and light curves for: Disc BB band Power-law band Slow variations are strong in either band Fast variations are suppressed in the disc band Fast variations are further reduced But reprocessing of power-law can add and dominate short-time-scale lags
A viscous propagation + reverberation model 0.1 Hz 1 Hz 10 Hz Reverberation dominates at the short time-scales where the slow viscous time-scale variations of the disc are washed out
Mapping the disc inner edge The observed soft lags imply Rin<50 RG in this hard state 440 ks on Cyg X-1 coming up in October – watch this space!!!
Disk stability changes • Hard state disks look unstable, soft state disks look stable – where does the change occur? • Obtained 2 TOO observations of GX 339-4 at epochs where the source shows significantly low-frequency Lorentzians at significantly different frequencies than in 2004 • Disk stabilises gradually through hard state? mdot connection? 0.5-0.9 keV 3-10 keV
IR vs XMM-Newton: revealing the disc-jet connection Covariance spectra XMM-Newton vs RXTE XMM-Newton vs IR Covariance spectrum shows disc correlates with jet emission: Disc drives at least some jet variability! Does disc correlate better with jet than harder X-rays?
Summary • Disc accretion fluctuations are driving variability in hard state BHXRBs, certainly on time-scales < 1s • Considering the interplay between the disc mdot variability and emitting regions we infer that it is likely the disc drives variability at even shorter time-scales • The disc seems to stabilise gradually towards the intermediate state • The disc is also driving the jet variations!