1 / 16

M.J. Franca & U. Lemmin RCEM, 6 th October 2005

CROSS-SECTION PERIODICITY OF TURBULENT GRAVEL-BED RIVER FLOWS. M.J. Franca & U. Lemmin RCEM, 6 th October 2005. OUTLINE. Instrumentation (ADVP) River measurements Bed forms Mean velocity Turbulence production Conclusions. ACOUSTIC DOPPLER VELOCITY PROFILER (ADVP). ADVP configuration.

mairi
Download Presentation

M.J. Franca & U. Lemmin RCEM, 6 th October 2005

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CROSS-SECTION PERIODICITY OF TURBULENT GRAVEL-BED RIVER FLOWS M.J. Franca & U. Lemmin RCEM, 6th October 2005

  2. OUTLINE • Instrumentation (ADVP) • River measurements • Bed forms • Mean velocity • Turbulence production • Conclusions

  3. ACOUSTIC DOPPLER VELOCITY PROFILER (ADVP) ADVP configuration deployable structure • Acoustic sonar is based on the echo backscattered by moving targets. • It allows the measurement of quasi-instantaneous 3D velocity profiles.

  4. RIVER MEASUREMENTS Investigation in the Swiss river Chamberonne under stationary and shallow water conditions. measuring grid – across the section measuring section

  5. BED FORMS • Periodic bed shape across the section - lb,y ≈ 2h ≈ 10%B • Signatures of streamwise sediment stripes produce during high water events when bed load transport occurs • Prandtl’s secondary motion of the second type may take place during high water events due to the decrease in the aspect ratio cross-section of the riverbed

  6. MEAN VELOCITY DISTRIBUTION: U contour lines of the mean streamwise velocity across-section • The structure of the flow is 3D • Mean flow distribution and flow resistance are strongly form-dependent • Periodically distributed high and low velocity regions were detected in the surface layer: CH and CL regions or cells • More intense CL cells coincide with the deeper profiles - periodicity lCL+,y ≈ 2h • The coexistence of CL and CH cells implies compensatory secondary motion

  7. TRANSVERSAL MEAN VELOCITY FIELD: V and W “detrended” mean transversal velocities • Permanent organized structure: SLOM – Surface Layer Organized Motion • Lateral mass transfer between CH and CL regions • A rotating movement is induced by the lateral transfer - streamwise vorticity • SLOM vortical cells scale with the water depth (density of 4 cells per meter)

  8. THE VELOCITY DIP • D-shaped profiles correspond to the CL regions • The occurrence of the d-shaped profiles is related to the local flow regime • For Fr<≈0.35 the dip phenomenon is important relation between the velocity dip and local Froude number

  9. PERIODICITY OF THE TURBULENCE PRODUCTION • The spectral dynamics is also conditioned by the bed form periodicity • The extent of the productive plateau varies as function of the bed forms ≈ 2 cm from the surface ≈ 2 cm from the bottom power spectrum density variation across the section

  10. CROSS-SECTION PERIODICITY OF THE FLOW STRUCTURE • Bed forms: lb,y ≈ 2h • Roughness: lk,y = lu*,y ≈ 2h, in phase • Momentum: lq,y ≈ 2h, out of phase • Velocity dip: lCL+,y ≈ 2h out of phase periodicity of different flow characteristics • All flow characteristics are bed-form dependent • The flow is influenced by the macro-scale roughness until the surface (undulation the dU curve)

  11. CONCLUSIONS • Existence of periodically distributed streamwise coarse sediment ridges formed during flood events • The flow structure is essentially 3D, hence 2D concepts are to be used with care • The hydraulic characteristics of the river flow are conditioned by the periodic bed forms: mean and turbulent flow • Existence of an organized 3D flow in the surface layer, SLOM, conditioned by the bed forms/local flow regime • A general wake effect induced by the large-scale roughness may confine the flow response to the layer z/h>0.80 • These results are important in respect to transport and mixing processes in rivers

  12. M.J. Franca & U. Lemmin RCEM, 6th October 2005

  13. FLOW RESISTANCE • The influence of the bed forms is also visible in the roughness parameterization of the flow (k and u*) • The Nikuradse equivalent roughness and the friction velocity are in phase with the bed forms: lk,y = lu*,y≈ 2h • The flow resistance has a strong form dependence

  14. CROSS-SECTION PERIODICITY OF THE FLOW STRUCTURE • lb,y ≈ 2h • lk,y = lu*,y ≈ 2h, in phase • lq,y ≈ 2h, out of phase • lCL+,y ≈ 2h out of phase All flow characteristics are influenced by the bed forms; in the presence of macro-scale roughness elements like these ones, the bed forms control the flow character up to the surface; the inviscid response of the flow is important all the way to the surface, as can be demonstrated by the undulation form of the dU curves.

More Related