1 / 27

W( → eν)+jets electron selection

W( → eν)+jets electron selection. Kira Grogg UW-Madison 03 June, 2009. Outline. Goals & Samples S/√(S+B) and Efficiency of electron variables for 0, 1, 2, 3+ jets All plots use progressive cuts: σ iηiη → Δφ in → Δη in → CombRelIso

maisie-dickson
Download Presentation

W( → eν)+jets electron selection

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. W(→eν)+jetselectron selection Kira Grogg UW-Madison 03 June, 2009 K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  2. Outline • Goals & Samples • S/√(S+B) and Efficiency of electron variables for 0, 1, 2, 3+ jets • All plots use progressive cuts: σiηiη→ Δφin → Δηin→ CombRelIso • S/√(S+B) and Efficiency of electron variables for bins of HT • All plots use progressive cuts: σiηiη→ Δφin → Δηin→ CombRelIso • HT = Sum of ET of electrons and all jets • S/√(S+B) and Efficiency of electron variables vs number of jets in the event • Electron pT & η, MET, W mT, W pT, jet pT & η for 1, 2, 3, 4+ jets • Using ID cuts based on W+1 jets K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  3. Goals • Long term • W + jets cross section measurement in 200 pb-1 • Investigate W pT spectrum, jet ET and multiplicity distributions • Short term • Determine appropriate electron selection for W+ ≥1 jet events • Events with more jets have higher QCD backgrounds • Jet is an iterativeCone5 Particle Flow jets of pT > 15 GeV K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  4. Signal + Background Samples • W+jets • Cross section 40 nb-1 • /Wjets/Summer08_IDEAL_V11_redigi_v1/GEN-SIM-RECO • QCD • Cross section X-Y - 20-30: 0.40 mb-1, 30-80: 0.10 mb-1, 80-170: 1.9*103 mb-1 • /QCD_Emenriched_PtXtoY/Summer08 _IDEAL_V11_redigi_v2/GEN-SIM-RECO • Z+jets • Cross section 3.7 nb-1 • /ZJets/Summer08_IDEAL_V11_redigi_v1/GEN-SIM-RECO • Ttbar+jets • Cross section 317 pb-1 • /TtJets/Summer08_IDEAL_V11_redigi_v1/GEN-SIM-RECO • Using PAT and Particle Flow with CMSSW_2_2_9 UW-Madison

  5. Electron ID cuts • Three types looked at • V9 tuned cuts for W→eν • Given in 12 May General EWK meeting • http://indico.cern.ch/materialDisplay.py?contribId=3&materialId=slides&confId=56236 • V11 tuned cuts for W→eν • CMS AN 2009/98 • Also in 22 May EWK electrons meeting • http://indico.cern.ch/materialDisplay.py?contribId=0&materialId=slides&confId=56256 • My cuts tuned for W+1 jets K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  6. S/√(S+B) & Efficiency for e ID cuts, by # of jets • Barrel Electrons • -- 0 jets • -- 1 jet • -- 2 jets • -- 3+ jets | V9 cuts | V11 cuts | My cuts | V11 cuts | V9 cuts σiηiη Δφin Δηin K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  7. S/√(S+B) & Efficiency for e ID cuts, by # of jets • Endcap Electrons • -- 0 jets • -- 1 jet • -- 2 jets • -- 3+ jets | V9 cuts | V11 cuts | My cuts σiηiη Δφin Δηin K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  8. S/√(S+B) & Efficiency for e ID cuts, by HT • Barrel Electrons • HT < 50 • 50 < HT < 100 • 100 < HT < 200 • HT > 200 | V9 cuts | V11 cuts | My cuts | My cuts | V9 cuts σiηiη Δφin Δηin K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  9. S/√(S+B) & Efficiency for e ID cuts, by HT • Endcap Electrons • HT < 50 • 50 < HT < 100 • 100 < HT < 200 • HT > 200 | V9 cuts | V11 cuts | My cuts | My cuts | V9 cuts σiηiη Δφin Δηin K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  10. S/√(S+B) & Efficiency for iso cuts, by Jets and HT After making My Id cuts By jet By HT 0 jets 1 jet 2 jets 3+ jets HT < 50 50 < HT < 100 100 < HT < 200 HT > 200 CombRelIso CombRelIso K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  11. ID S/√(S+B) by number of jets • Cuts are progressive • --- V9 Cuts • --- V11 Cuts • --- My Cuts σiηiη S/√(S+B) of σiηiη My cuts and V9 cuts have better S/√(S+B) # PF jets in event Δφin Δηin S/√(S+B) of Δηin S/√(S+B) of Δφin # PF jets in event # PF jets in event K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  12. ID Efficiency by number of jets • Cuts are progressive • --- V9 Cuts • --- V11 Cuts • --- My Cuts Efficiency of σiηiη σiηiη My cuts have worse efficiency V11 cuts have best (overall looser) # PF jets in event Efficiency of Δφin Efficiency of Δηin Δφin Δηin # PF jets in event # PF jets in event K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  13. Iso Efficiency and S/√(S+B) by number of jets • ID cuts have been applied • --- V9 Cuts • --- V11 Cuts • --- My Cuts S/√(S+B) Efficiency CombRelIso CombRelIso My cuts and V9 cuts have slightly better S/√(S+B) than V11 cuts My cuts and V9 cuts have worse efficiency than V11 cuts K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  14. Comparison of ID cuts For W+≥1 jets events, 200 pb-1 • For V11 samples, the W→eν cuts tuned for V9 have the best S/√(S+B) for W+≥1 jets events K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  15. Expected events for 200 pb-1, √s = 10 Tev • Selection • Electron |η| < 2.4, pT > 20 • V9 tuned electron ID cuts • Electron CombRelIso < 0.1 • No 2nd electron • W transverse mass window: 55 < mT < 105 K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  16. Electron pT for 1, 2, 3, 4+ jets K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  17. Electron η for 1, 2, 3, 4+ jets K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  18. MET for 1, 2, 3, 4+ jet events MET, 1 reco jet MET, 2 reco jets MET, 3 reco jets K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  19. W mT for 1, 2, 3, 4+ jet events mT, 1 reco jet mT, 2 reco jets mT, 3 reco jets K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  20. W pT for 1, 2, 3, 4+ jet events pT, 1 reco jet pT, 2 reco jets pT, 3 reco jets K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  21. Jet pT for 1, 2, 3, 4+ jets K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  22. Jet Y for 1, 2, 3, 4 jets K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  23. Conclusions/Next steps • W+≥1 jet events need looser ID cuts than W→eν events • Will use ID cuts based on W→eν V9 tuned cuts • Given in General EWK talk 12 May, 2009 • Overall acceptance of full electron selection: 48-54% • Overall acceptance including mT window: 33-41% • Moving on… • Reduce top background • Reconstruct invariant mass of two jets • In progress K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  24. Backup K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  25. Electron ID cut values • Values for V9, V11, and My cuts K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  26. H/E cut removed • H/E cuts doesn’t greatly reduce background for the amount of signal lost • No longer used in the robust electron ID Barrel S/√(S+B) & Efficiency Endcap S/√(S+B) & Efficiency K. Grogg, UW-Madison

  27. Investigating high pT Efficiency loss W+jets 30 < elec pT < 50 W+jets elec pT < 30 W+jets above elec pT > 50 QCD QCD not binned – doesn’t change with electron pT • Can’t improve high pT cuts without allowing more background • New W→eν cuts don’t use H/E Δφinand Δηin don’t have high pT dependence UW-Madison

More Related