420 likes | 571 Views
Agenda – Rebuild Stafford High School. ▪ Educational Program - Update Automotive Options ▪ Practice Fields - Additional Options. ▪ Educational Program. Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School. Automotive Program Requirement for SHS Options:
E N D
Agenda – Rebuild Stafford High School ▪ Educational Program - Update Automotive Options • ▪ Practice Fields • - Additional Options
Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School • Automotive Program Requirement for SHS • Options: • #1 - Replace Current Program Space • #2 - Add to Main HS Building • #3 - Detached Building on Campus • #4 - No Change from Approved Program
Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School • Automotive Program Requirement for SHS • Options: • #3 - Detached Building on Campus • 6 Bays = Estimated $3M • 4 Bays = Estimated $1.96M
Educational Program – Rebuild Stafford High School • Automotive Program Requirement for SHS • Options: • #4 – No Change From Approved Program • Maximize Program Space @ BPHS & NSHS • Partnership Agreement with GCC • MOU Being Drafted
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Tennis Plan – Venues Investigated • High Schools CFHS & BPHS • Middle Schools GMS & DSMS • YMCA • Pratt Park • UMW • Fredericksburg Country Club
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Tennis Plan – Option #1 (High Schools) • B/G Tennis – BPHS & CFHS • Boys @ BPHS • Girls @ CFHS • Practices Times 6-8 PM (Monday – Friday) • No Home Games • Transportation – 2 Buses
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Tennis Plan – Option #1 (High Schools) • Pros: • SCPS Facilities • Easy Coordination with Administration • Lighting at Playing Fields • Cons: • Late Practices • Estimated Transportation Cost = $9K annually
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Tennis Plan – Option #2 (Middle Schools) • B/G Tennis @ Gayle MS & Dixon Smith MS • Boys @ GMS • Girls @ DSMS • Practices Times 3-6 PM (Monday – Friday) • No Home Games • Transportation – 2 Buses
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Tennis Plan – Option #2 (Middle Schools) • Pros: • SCPS Facilities within Attendance Area • Easy Coordination with Administration & No Scheduling Conflicts • Afternoon Practice • Cons: • Estimated Transportation Cost = $9K annually • Cost to Add HS Court Surface = TBD • No Lights
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Tennis Plan – Option #3 (YMCA & Pratt Park) • B/G Tennis @ YMCA & Pratt Park • Rent Court Time @ Butler Road YMCA • Courts Available • 6:00 AM – 7:15 AM (4 Courts) • 3:00 PM – 5:30 PM (2 Courts) • Utilize Court Time @ Pratt Park • Courts Available • Afternoon (4 Courts) • No Home Games • Transportation 1- 2 Buses
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Tennis Plan – Option #3 (YMCA) • Pros: • Indoor – No Weather Issues • Morning = Four Courts • Manage Similar to Swim Teams • Consider No Bus Transportation (Mornings) • Within the Attendance Area • Cons: • Rental Cost = < $4K annually • Only One Team • Students/Parents Provide Transportation in AM • Morning only 1:15 Hours • Afternoon = Only Two Courts • Estimated Transportation Cost (Afternoon) = $4.5K
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Tennis Plan – Option #3 (Pratt Park) • Pros: • County Facility – No Cost • Four Courts • Relatively New Court Surfaces • Reserved • Within the Attendance Area • Afternoon Practice • Cons: • Only One Team • Estimated Transportation Cost = $4.5K Annually • No Lights
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Tennis Plan – Option #4 (UMW) • B/G Tennis @ UMW • Rent Court Time from UMW • Courts Available • 3- 5 PM (6 Courts) • No Home Games • Potentially Use UMW as Home Game Venue • Transportation – 1 Bus
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Tennis Plan – Option #4 (UMW) • Pros: • Indoor & Outdoor Practice • Two Teams • Bus Transportation – 1 Bus • Cons: • Non-SCPS Facility & Outside County/Attendance Area • NCAA Waiver Required • Cost – $2K annually • Scheduling Issues • Estimated Transportation Cost = $4.5K annually
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Tennis Plan – Option #5 (FCC) • B/G Tennis @ Fredericksburg Country Club • Rent Court Time from FCC • Courts Available • 3- 6 PM (2 Indoor/5 Outdoor Courts) • No Home Games • Use FCC as Home Game Venue • Transportation – 1 Bus
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Tennis Plan – Option #5 (FCC) • Pros: • Indoor & Outdoor Practice • Two Teams • Bus Transportation – 1 Bus • Cons: • Non-SCPS Facility • FCC Board Approval - TBD • Cost – TBD • Length of Transportation • Estimated Transportation Cost = $4.5K annually
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Option A – Install Turf Field • Option B – Stagger practice times on existing fields • Option C – Stagger practice times on existing fields w/Chichester Park • Option D – Cliff Farm • Option E – Relocation displaced practices off campus • Option F – Max Use of Fields w/Limited Displacement • Option G – Construction of Temporary Field
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • OptionsF – Max Use of Existing Fields w/Limited Displacement • B/G Tennis off site • Fall: Football Practice – Competition Football & Baseball/Softball Fields • Spring: Lacrosse – Off Campus to Gayle MS • Spring: Boys Soccer – Competition Football Field
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Options F – Max Use of Existing Fields w/Limited Displacement • Fall Football • Utilize Competition Football Field • Utilize both Competition Baseball & Softball Fields • Pros: • On Campus • No Change from Current Practices • After School Tutoring Available • Activity Bus Available • Use of Locker Rooms
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Options F – Max Use of Existing Fields w/Limited Displacement • Fall Football • Cons: • Impacts Fall Baseball/Softball • Work Around – Use Other HSs & Potentially Chichester Park after 2014 • Excessive Wear on Fields • Requires Additional Maintenance During Summer; Estimate Cost = $50K+/-
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Options F – Max Use of Existing Fields w/Limited Displacement • Spring Lacrosse • Utilize Gayle MS • Pros: • Excellent Field • Close to SHS • No Traffic Issues • No Conflict with MS Programs
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Options F – Max Use of Existing Fields w/Limited Displacement • Spring Lacrosse • Cons: • Bus to & from GMS w/Equipment • Two (2) Buses • Est. Annual Cost $9K • Practice Start 3:00 PM • Provides Time for Tutoring • Late Activity Bus • Est. Annual Cost $4.5K • HS Students on MS Campus
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Options F – Max Use of Existing Fields w/Limited Displacement • Spring Boys Soccer • Utilize Competition Stadium Field • Pros: • On Campus • No Change from Current Practices • After School Tutoring Available • Activity Bus Available • Use of Locker Rooms
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Options F – Max Use of Existing Fields w/Limited Displacement • Spring Soccer • Cons: • Excessive Wear on Stadium Field • Requires Additional Maintenance During Summer
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Practice Field Options G – Construction of Temporary Field on Campus; Max Use of Existing Fields & Limited Displacement • B/G Tennis off site • Fall: Football Practice – SHS Competition Stadium & New Temporary Fields 2013 – 2014; Competition Stadium and Baseball/Softball Fields 2015 • Spring: Lacrosse – Gayle MS Spring 2013; SHS Temporary Field 2014 – 2015; Gayle MS Spring 2016 • Spring: Boys Soccer – SHS Competition Stadium Field
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Practice Field Options G – Construction of Temporary Field on Campus; Max Use of Existing Fields & Limited Displacement • Pros: • Keeps majority of team practices on Campus • Exception - Tennis Off Site 2013 - 2015 • Exception - Lacrosse 2013 & 2016 • Baseball & Softball Fields Available for Use in Fall • Except Fall 2015 • Temp Field will be Bermuda and Irrigated
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Practice Field Options G – Construction of Temporary Field on Campus; Max Use of Existing Fields & Limited Displacement • Cons: • Temporary Field Construction - $300K • Available late Summer 2013 (August) • Students Access to Field w/cross Construction Traffic • Field Maintenance - $10K per year • Potential Site Constraints for HS Contractor • No Area to Store Spoils • Overall Project Cost Could Increase • Temporary Field Demolished July 2015
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices QUESTIONS?
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • OptionsA – Turf Field • B/G Tennis off site @ BPHS & CFHS • Lacrosse - Competition Football Field Spring 2013 • Convert Football Field to Turf Field (Jun 15 – Aug 1) • Includes expansion of track (8 Lanes) • Cost = $1.5M • Fall: Football Practice - Turf Field & Baseball/Softball Fields • Spring: Boys Soccer and Lacrosse - Turf Field (stagger practice times)
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • OptionsA – Turf Field • Pros: • Keeps 95% of team practices on Campus • Installs All Weather Turf Field • Expands SHS track to 8 lanes • Cons: • Additional $1.5M for Turf Field Project • Summer construction will be tight • Staggered practice times in Spring • Baseball/Softball Fields used for Football in Fall • Limited Fall Baseball/Softball
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • OptionsB – NO TURF FIELD; Staggered Practice Times on Existing Fields • B/G Tennis off site • Fall: Football Practice – Competition Football & Baseball/Softball Fields • Spring: Lacrosse – Competition Football Field (stagger practice times) • Spring: Boys Soccer – Competition Football Field and/or Field Hockey Field (stagger practice times)
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Options B – NO TURF FIELD; Staggered Practice Times on Existing Fields • Pros: • Keeps 95% of team practices on Campus • Cons: • Field Conditions will be Poor • Practice & Games • Weather will have compounding effect • Requires $60 - $80K per year for Field Maintenance • Staggered practice times in Spring • Baseball/Softball Fields used for Football in Fall • Limited Fall Baseball/Softball
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • OptionsC – Stagger Practice Times on Existing Field & Use Chichester Park • B/G Tennis off site • Fall: Football Practice • Competition Football & Baseball/Softball Fields 2013 • Spring: Lacrosse • Competition Football Field (stagger practice times) 2013 • Competition Football Field 2014 - 2016 • Spring: Boys Soccer • Competition Football/Field Hockey Fields (stagger practice times) 2013 • Chichester Park 2014 - 2016
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Options C - Stagger Practice Times on Existing Field & Use Chichester Park • Pros: • Keeps 95% of team practices on or adjacent to Campus • Cons: • Field Conditions will be Poor • Practice & Games • Weather will have compounding effect • Requires $60 - $80K per year for Field Maintenance • Staggered practice times in Spring 2013 • Baseball/Softball Fields used for Football in Fall • Limited Fall Baseball/Softball • Park Field used for Soccer
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • OptionsD – Build Fields @ Cliff Farm • B/G Tennis Off Site @ BPHS & CFHS • Fall: Football Practice – Cliff Farm • Spring: Lacrosse – Cliff Farm • Spring: Boys Soccer – Cliff Farm
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Options D – Build Fields @ Cliff Farm • Pros: • All Displaced Practices @ One Location • Cons: • Requires Construction Project Spring/Summer 2013 • 2 Fields w/Temp Parking - $300K • Irrigation - $100K • No Support Facilities • No Potable Water • Requires $40K for annual Field Maintenance • Estimated $50K to bus students off-on Campus/Year • Requires scheduling late Activities Bus • Could impact future school construction
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • OptionsE – Relocated Displaced Practices Off Campus • B/G Tennis Off Site @ BPHS & CFHS • Fall: Football Practice – Gari Melchers • Spring: Lacrosse • Gari Melchers 2013 • DSMS 2014 - 2016 • Spring: Boys Soccer – GMS
Relocation of Athletic Team Practices • Options E – Relocate Displaced Practices Off Campus • Pros: • Practices held in the Attendance Zone & at SCPS Facilities • Existing Competition Fields @ SHS are not over stressed • Cons: • Practices will be delayed 45 minutes after school for tutoring opportunities • Estimated $50K to bus students off-on Campus/Year • Requires scheduling late Activities Bus