580 likes | 595 Views
SHOCK July 12, 2001. Rob Hall and Dr. John King. Case. 16yo male, riding bike then swerved into traffic and was struck by a truck A: gurgling, stridor, facial trauma B: RR 35, sat 85%, subQ air on R, abrasion over sternum, dec AE on R, wheeze C: diaphoretic, HR 145, BP 70/50, +JVD
E N D
Case • 16yo male, riding bike then swerved into traffic and was struck by a truck • A: gurgling, stridor, facial trauma • B: RR 35, sat 85%, subQ air on R, abrasion over sternum, dec AE on R, wheeze • C: diaphoretic, HR 145, BP 70/50, +JVD • secondary: pelvic #, femur #, large scalp laceration, skin looks red
Case • Ddx of shock in this patient • hemorrhagic: hemothorax, abdomen, pelvis #, femur #, scalp laceration • obstrucitve: tension pneumo/hemothorax • cardiogenic: cardiac tamponade • anaphylactic: the patient was stung by a bee, lost control of bike and was struck by a car
Definition of Shock • Shock is the clinical manifestations of the inability of the circulatory system to adequately supply tissues with nutrients and remove toxic waste
Classification of Shock • Quantitative • hypovolemic, hemorrhagic, obstructive, myocardial dysfunction • Qualitative • sepsis, anaphylaxis, neurogenic, dyshemoglobinemia, cellular poisons
Classification of Shock • Pre - heart • hypovolemia, venous pooling • Heart • contractility, arrythmias, mech obstruction • Post - heart • loss of vascular tone, inability to deliver to tissues, inability of tissues to utilize
Etiological Classification • S - septic • S - spinal (neurogenic) • H - hypovolemic/hemorrhagic • O - obstructive (PE, pthrx, hthrx, ct) • O - other (CN, CO, HS, MetHb) • C - cardiogenic • K - anaphylaCTic
Pathophysiology • FOUR unifying features of shock • intracellular calcium overload • intracellular hydrogen ion • cellular and interstitial edema • catabolic metabolism
Shock Treatment Goals • FOUR goals of treatment • oxygenation • ventilation • volume replacement • vasopressor support
Approach to Undifferentiated Shock • Targeted history • septic: fever, immunocompromised • hypovolemic: vomiting, diarrhea, abdo pain • hemorrhagic: trauma, bleeding (UGI, LGI, PV), abdo pain (AAA) • obstructive: chest pain, trauma • other: environmental exposures • cardiogenic: chest pain • anaphylatic: allergic reactions
Approach to Undifferentiated Shock • Investigations • labs • ECG • CXR • ABG • urine
Definitions:Consensus conference on definitions for sepsis: Critical Care Medicine 2000. Volume 28 (1): 232 - 235 • Sepsis • clinical response to infection manifested by two or more of the following as a result of infection • temp > 38 or < 36 • HR > 90 • RR > 20 or PaC02 < 32 • wbc > 12 or > 10% bands
Definitions Continued • Septic Shock • sepsis induced hypotension or the requirement for vasopressors or inotropes to maintain BP despite adequate fluids in the presence of… • lactic acidosis • oliguria • acute alterations of mentation
Management of Septic Shock • Fluids • boluses of NS or RL • Pressors • dopamine, norepinephrine • consider after 3 boluses of crystalloid • Antibiotics • broad spectrum empiric coverage
New Approaches to Septic Shock • Vasoactive mediators • vasopressin, nitric oxide • Coagulation Cascade • protein C, protein S, antithrombin III • Inflammatory mediators • anti TNF antibodies, anti LPS, TFPI
Vasopressin and Sepsis • Tsuneyoshi et al. Crit Care Medicine 2001. • Prospective study N=16 • No control • Improved hemodynamic parameters • No effect on mortality
Antithrombin III and Sepsis • Human Trial control AIII Fourrier 1993 50% 28% (NS) Diaz 1994 31% 35% (NS) Baudo 1998 46% 50% (NS) Eisele 1998 41% 25% (NS)
Protein C and Septic Shock • Bernard et al. NEJM 2001. • RCT 1690 patients • mortality in placebo 30.8% • mortality in tx grp 24.7% • ARR of 6.1% p=0.005 • serious bleeding 3.5% vs 2% in control (p=.06) • conclusion: decreased mortality, increased bleeding
IVIG in Septic Shock • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Alejandria mm et al • 23 RCTs for total of 6991 patients • overall IVIG RR of death 0.92 (.86,.99) • anti-endotoxin monoclonal Ab RR 1.03 (.8,1.2) • polyclonal IVIG RR 0.6 (0.47,0.76) • conclusion: polyclonal IVIG promising adjunct, no evidence for monoclonal antibodies
Neurogenic Shock • Spinal Shock • initial loss of spinal cord function following SCI including motor, sensory, and sympathetic function • Neurogenic Shock • loss of sympathetic autonomic function due to spinal cord injury
Neurogenic Shock • Hypotension and bradycardia (relative) • Due to unopposed parasympathetic function • Arterial and venous dilation, bradycardia • Management • iv fluid • atropine • vasopressors
Hemorrhagic Shock • Management • ABCs, vascular access, crystalloid bolus X 2, blood transfusion prn • controversies • NS versus RL • crystalloid versus colloid • immediate versus delayed • small versus large volume resuscitation • Optimal endpoints of resuscitation
End Points of Resuscitation • Base Deficit • used as an approximation of tissue acidosis • “an increasing base deficit in a stable appearing patient should be concerning for ongoing hemorrhage” • retrospective evidence • Rutherford EJ 1992. Retrospective review of 3791 patients. Largest study.
End Points of Resuscitation • Lactate Levels • used as an indirect measure for oxygen debt, hypoperfusion, and the severity of shock • lots of animal and human data showing correlation with mortality in shock • prospective trials: correlation with mortality • “normal serum lactate levels is a suitable end point of resuscitation
Colloids • Albumin, protoplasm protein fraction, hydroxyethylstarch, gelatin, dextran • Advantages • less fluid required, more volume in vascular space, potential to draw fluid in from tissues • Disadvantages • expensive, allergic reactions, coagulopathies
Colloids • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. BMJ 1998: 317:235-40. • Objective: effect of albumin on mortality • Study: 30 RCTs total 1419 patients • Results: RR of death 1.46 hypovolemia, 2.40 burns, 1.69 hypoalbuminemia • Pooled RR of death 1.68 (1.26,2.23) • Conclusion: albumin increases mortality
Colloids • Cochrane Database 2000. Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation. • Albumin: 18RCTs RR1.52 (1.08,2.13) • HES: 7 RCTs RR 1.16 (0.68,1.96) • Gelatin: 4 RCTs RR 0.50(.08,3.03) • Dextran: 8 RCTs RR 1.24 (.94,1.65) • Conclusion: No evidence that albumins reduce risk of death in trauma, burns, or surgery
Colloids - summary • There is NO evidence that colloids decrease mortality in the resuscitation of critically ill patients. • There IS evidence that colloids increase mortality in the resuscitation of critically ill patients.
Hypertonic Saline • Advantages • less volume, stays in vascular space, draws fluid • Disadvantages • hypernatremia, hyperosmolarity, seizures, coaguulopathy, anaphylactoid rxns with dextran
Hypertonic Saline • Animal evidence • improved hemodynamics and mortality • Human evidence • Wade et al 1997: HS and HSD in trauma • Metanalysis of 8 RCTS of HSD and 6 HS • HS (7.5% saline): no difference in mortality • HSD (+6%dextran): decreased mortality in 7/8 trials overall 3.5%; trend only ---> Not stat sign
Hypertonic Saline • Cochrane Database 2001. Alderson P. • Objective: effect on mortality • Study: metanalysis of 8 RCTs • Results: pooled RR of 0.88 (0.74, 1.95) • Conclusion: there is a trend toward reduction in mortality with HSD although not statistically significant
Hypertonic Saline - Conclusions • There is evidence of TRENDS toward lower mortality in resuscitation with hypertonic saline but statistical significance has not been demonstrated ………… • More RCTs are needed………..
Controlled Fluid Resuscitation • Rationale: early, aggressive fluid resuscitation with large volume dislodges soft clots and dilutes clotting factors leading to increased hemorrhage and mortality
Bickell et al and Controlled Fluid Resuscitation - “here piggy,piggy”
Bickell et al 1990The Detrimental Effects of Intravenous Crystalloid after Aortotomy in Swine. Surgery 110: 529-36. • Objective: does rapid volume replacement inc mortality? • Study: 16 pigs, 8 controls (no fluid), 8 tx (RL 80 ml/kg ) • Results Mortality Hemorrhage • Controls 0/8 783 ml • RL tx grp 8/8 2142ml • Bickell et al 1992. HSD vs RL after Aortotomy • HSD tx grp 5/8 1340ml
Bickell et al. NEJM 1994.Immediate versus Delayed Fluid Resuscitation for Hypotensive Patients with Penetrating Torso Trauma • Study: 598 patients SBP<90, odd/even day randomization, immediate fluids vs none until OR • Immediate fluids - mortality 110/303 (38%) • Delayed fluids - mortality 86/289 (30%) • Statistically significant p = 0.04 • Conclusion: delayed fluid resuscitation reduces mortality in hypotensive patients with penetrating trauma
Controlled Fluid Resuscitation • Cochrane Database 2001. Kwan I. Timing and volume of fluid administration for patients with bleeding following trauma. • 3 RCTs for early vs delayed fluids • 3 RCTs for large vs small volume • NO evidence for early or large volume fluid replacement and trends toward increased mortality
Controlled Fluid Resuscitation - Conclusions • There is evidence (limited) that early, large volume aggressive fluid resuscitation increases mortality in penetrating trauma. • Further study needed on penetrating trauma without immediate access to OR and for blunt trauma
Cardiogenic Shock • Definition • decreased cardiac output and evidence of tissue hypoxia in presence of adequate intravascular volume • Criteria • hypotension (SBP < 90), cardiac index < 2.2 L/min/m2, PCWP > 15 mmHg
Cardiogenic Shock • Management • small fluid boluses • invasive monitoring • vasopressors • norepinephrine • dopamine • dobutamine
Cardiogenic Shock • Dobutamine: beta adrenergic • positive B1 ionotrope; may drop BP b/c of vasodilation • SBP 70 - 100 without signs of hypoperfusion a/f fluids • Dopamine: dopaminergic, beta , alpha adrenergic • SBP 70 - 100 with signs of hypoperfusion after fluids • Norepinephrine • alpha agonist • SBP < 70 after fluids
Cardiogenic Shock • Thrombolysis • GISSI (N=280) 30day mortality • streptokinase 70.1% • medical mx 69.6% • NO trial has shown reduction mortality with cardiogenic shock with thrombolysis