10 likes | 88 Views
Team Photo or Logo Here. Title of Your Project Goes Here! Lastname , F.N., Otherlastname , F.N., Finallastname , F.N. ESCI 111, Physical Geology Chapman University, Orange, CA. Introduction
E N D
Team Photoor Logo Here • Title of Your Project Goes Here! • Lastname, F.N., Otherlastname, F.N., Finallastname, F.N. • ESCI 111, Physical Geology • Chapman University, Orange, CA Introduction Here is where the introduction and background will go. You can resize the font size as needed to fit but this is a decent size for good viewability. Feel free to change font types, colors, backgrounds, etc. as you like; just make sure the contrast is sufficient so all text can be read easily. Here is where the introduction and background will go. You can resize the font size as needed to fit but this is a decent size for good viewability. Feel free to change font types, colors, backgrounds, etc. as you like; just make sure the contrast is sufficient so all text can be read easily. Here is where the introduction and background will go. You can resize the font size as needed to fit but this is a decent size for good viewability. Feel free to change font types, colors, backgrounds, etc. as you like; just make sure the contrast is sufficient so all text can be read easily. Here is where the introduction and background will go. You can resize the font size as needed to fit but this is a decent size for good viewability. Hypothesis Your hypothesis should go here; remember it is a simple and concise generalization of some scientific process which you will then proceed to test with your experiment. Your hypothesis should go here; remember it is a simple and concise generalization of some scientific process which you will then proceed to test with your experiment. Experimental Method This is your experimental method as you had it written up previously, probably revised somewhat to account for adjustments you may have made along the way. Bullet points might be useful: • Here’s what we did first. • Here’s what we did next. • Here’s what we did next. Figures or tables would go here as well to demonstrate visually your experimental method. Results Results can be posted here, in two-column format so as to improve readability. You should actually use figures and graphs as much as possible and just let the text explain or clarify the figures. Science is largely and most succinctly expressed through figures! Results can be posted here, in two-column format so as to improve readability. You should actually use figures and graphs as much as possible and just let the text explain or clarify the figures. Science is largely and most succinctly expressed through figures! Results can be posted here, in two-column format so as to improve readability. You should actually use figures and graphs as much as possible and just let the text explain or clarify the figures. Science is largely and most succinctly expressed through figures! Results can be posted here, in two-column format so as to improve readability. You should actually use figures and graphs as much as possible and just let the text explain or clarify the figures. Science is largely and most succinctly expressed through figures! Results can be posted here, in two-column format so as to improve readability. You should actually use figures and graphs as much as possible and just let the text explain or clarify the figures. Science is largely and most succinctly expressed through figures! Results can be posted here, in two-column format so as to improve readability. You should actually use figures and graphs as much as possible and just let the text explain or clarify the figures. Science is largely and most succinctly expressed through figures! Conclusions (continued) Your conclusions should not just be a recap of your results, but rather an attempt to explain your results in the context of your hypothesis. Provide reasons *why* your results turned out the way they did (educated guesses are okay as long as you have evidence/data to back them up), whether the results agree with the hypothesis, why or why not, and how you may revise your hypothesis if there are some discrepancies. Your conclusions should not just be a recap of your results, but rather an attempt to explain your results in the context of your hypothesis. Provide reasons *why* your results turned out the way they did (educated guesses are okay as long as you have evidence/data to back them up), whether the results agree with the hypothesis, why or why not, and how you may revise your hypothesis if there are some discrepancies. Your conclusions should not just be a recap of your results, but rather an attempt to explain your results in the context of your hypothesis. Provide reasons *why* your results turned out the way they did (educated guesses are okay as long as you have evidence/data to back them up), whether the results agree with the hypothesis, why or why not, and how you may revise your hypothesis if there are some discrepancies. Future Research Here you can provide ideas for future experiments that would test other aspects of your hypothesis, extend your hypothesis to other locations/conditions to test its transferability (that is, whether it also holds true in situations different from those of your experiment), and possibly some predictions of what sorts of results you expect based onyourhypothesis, now strengthened by your experiment. Bullet points may help: • Here’s an idea for an additional experiment. • Here’s an idea for an additional experiment. • Here’s an idea for an additional experiment. • Here’s an idea for an additional experiment. Acknowledgements Make sure to acknowledge any resources/ or individuals who may have helped you in completing this experiment. References (examples below) 1. Banfield, J.F., Welch, S.A., Zhang, H.Z., Ebert, T.T., and Penn, R.L. (2000) Aggregation-based crystal growth and microstructure development in natural iron oxyhydroxidebiomineralization products. Science 289(5480): 751-754. 2. Waychunas, G.A., Kim, C.S., and Banfield, J.F. (2005) Nanoparticulate oxide minerals in soils and sediments: unique properties and contaminant scavenging mechanisms. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 7: 409-433. This would be a good location for a figure, photo, map, flow chart, or schematic if you have one. This would be a good location for a figure, photo, map, flow chart, or schematic if you have one. Your Text Here Figure 3. Figure captions should go below the figures themselves. Figure 4. Figure captions should go below the figures themselves. Figure 5. Figure captions should go below the figures themselves. Figure 1. Figure captions should go below the figures themselves. Figure 2. Figure captions should go below the figures themselves. Table 2. Table captions should go above the tables themselves, unlike figure caps. Results can be posted here, in two-column format so as to improve readability. You should actually use figures and graphs as much as possible and just let the text explain or clarify the figures. Science is largely and most succinctly expressed through figures! Results can be posted here, in two-column format so as to improve readability. You should actually use figures and graphs as much as possible and just let the text explain or clarify the figures. Science is largely and most succinctly expressed through figures! Results can be posted here, in two-column format so as to improve readability. You should actually use figures and graphs as much as possible and just let the text Conclusions Your conclusions should not just be a recap of your results, but rather an attempt to explain your results in the context of your hypothesis. Provide reasons *why* your results turned out the way they did (educated guesses are okay as long as you have evidence/data to back them up), whether the results agree with the hypothesis, why or why not, and how you may revise your hypothesis if there are some discrepancies. Your conclusions should not just be a recap of your results, but rather an attempt to explain your results in the context of your hypothesis. Provide reasons *why* your Your conclusions should not just be a recap of your results, but rather an attempt to explain your results in the context of your hypothesis. Provide reasons *why* your results turned out the way they did (educated guesses are okay as long as you have evidence/data to back them up), whether the results agree with the hypothesis, why or why not, and how you may revise your hypothesis if there are some discrepancies. Your conclusions should not just be a recap of your results, but rather an attempt to explain your results in the context of your hypothesis. Provide reasons *why* your Table 1. Table captions should go above the tables themselves, unlike figure caps.