440 likes | 621 Views
IIMC Long Duration Executive Education Executive Programme in Business Management Statistics for Managerial Decisions. Prof. Saibal Chattopadhyay IIM Calcutta. An Outline of the Course. Probability Theory: Basic Concepts Distribution Theory:Random Variables
E N D
IIMC Long Duration Executive EducationExecutive Programme in Business ManagementStatistics for Managerial Decisions Prof. Saibal Chattopadhyay IIM Calcutta
An Outline of the Course • Probability Theory: Basic Concepts • Distribution Theory:Random Variables • Utility Theory: Decisions under Uncertainty • Different Probability Distributions and their applications: Modeling real data • Bi-variate Data Analysis: Correlation and regression • Multivariate Data Analysis: Multiple and partial correlations; multiple regression • Sampling Theory: Different Methods • Statistical Inference
Uncertainty and Randomness • Theory of Probability • Random variables & Probability Distributions • Mean & Variance of a distribution Decisions under uncertainty - Utility Theory - Decision Making using expected utility
Theory of Probability Preliminaries • Random Experiment – outcomes bound by chance • Events – outcomes of a random experiment Example 1: A coin is tossed twice A = there is at least one head Event A has the following decompositions: A1: Head in both tosses (HH) A2: Head in 1st toss, Tail in 2nd (HT) A3: Tail in 1st toss, Head in 2nd (TH) No further decomposition possible – these are simple events
Simple events – can’t be decomposed further • Sample Space – Collection of all simple events (Sure event : S) • Impossible event: events impossible to occur (φ ) B = at least 3 heads : B = φ Probability Space : (S, P) S = Sample Space P = Probability function on simple events in S
P(.) 0 for any simple event, and Sum of all probabilities for simple events = 1. Then P(A) = Sum of the probabilities for those simple events which constitute event A. Example 1: S = {HH, HT, TH, TT} P(HH) = P(HT) = P(TH) = P(TT) = ¼ (equally likely outcomes – set-up of classical definition) A = at least one head = {HH, HT, TH} Therefore, P(A) = P(HH) + P(HT) + P(TH) = ¾
If outcomes not equally likely (general case): Suppose the coin is biased, with P(H) = 1/3 & P(T)=2/3 Then P(HH) = 1/9, P(HT) = 2/9, P(TH) = 2/9, P(TT) = 4/9, and P(A) = P(HH) + P(HT) + P(TH) = 5/9 If B = at least 3 heads, then P(B) = 0 In general, P(.) is a number between 0 & 1. P(.) close to 0 : unlikely to occur P(.) close to 1: very likely to occur Probability: An attempt to quantify the degree of uncertainty
Some Set-theoretic Operations with Events • Union: AB is the event which occurs if at least one of A and B occurs; • Intersection: AB is the event which occurs if A and B occur together; • Difference: A – B is the event which occurs if A occurs, but not B; • Complement: Ac is the event which occurs if event A does not occur
Some special types of events • Mutually Exclusive Events: A and B are mutually exclusive (disjoint) if they cannot occur together Notation: AB = φ For three events A, B and C, they are disjoint if no two can occur together, i.e., AB = φ, AC = φ and BC = φ
Exhaustive events: A set of events A1, A2,…,Ak is exhaustive if at least one of them is sure to occur, A1A2…Ak = Sample space = S • Partition of Sample Space: A1, A2, …, Ak form a partition of S if they are mutually exclusive as well as exhaustive. Example: A and Ac are disjoint (by definition) and are exhaustive; so they form a partition
An Example Experiment consists of selecting three items from a manufacturer’s output and observing whether or not each item is defective. Call Defective = D and non-defective = G. S = Sample space = {DDD, DDG, DGD, GDD, DGG, GDG, GGD, GGG} Total no. of elements = 23 = 8 Suppose all are equally probable; then probability of each simple event = 1/8
A = exactly one defective item = {DGG, GDG, GGD}; P(A) = 3/8. B = at most one defective = {GGG, DGG, GDG, GGD}; P(B) = 4/8=1/2 C = items drawn are all of the same type = {GGG, DDD}; P(C) = 2/8. AB = {GGG, DGG, GDG, GGD} = B Here event A is contained in event B: AB. Then AB = A. Ac = {DDD, DDG, DGD, GDD, GGG} = S – A P(Ac) = 5/8 = 1 – P(A).
B C = {GGG}; P(BC) = 1/8. BC = {GGG, DGG, GDG, GGD, DDD}; P(BC) = 5/8. But note that this is SAME as P(B) + P(C) – P(BC) = 4/8 + 2/8 – 1/8. Earlier we also noted that P(Ac) = 1 – P(A). Are these mere coincidences, or are generally true? True, depending on specific conditions.
Some Probability Results • (For disjoint events): If A and B are disjoint, P(AB) = P(A) + P(B) • If they are not disjoint, P(AB) = P(A) + P(B) – P(AB) • P(Ac) = 1 – P(A) • Any event A can occur either with a second event B jointly (i.e. AB occurs) or without the occurrence of the event B (i.e., ABc occurs). Thus P(A) = P(AB) + P(ABc)
More than two events? P(ABC) = P(A) + P(B) + P(C), if disjoint; But P(ABC) = P(A) + P(B) + P(C) - P(AB) – P(AC) – P(BC) + P(ABC). How to tackle probability of intersections? P(AB) = ? P(ABC) = ? Need some further concepts !!
Conditional Probability – Updating prior belief Knowing some event A to have occurred already, what is the chance that another event B will also occur ? P(B | A) = conditional prob. of B, given A = P(AB)/P(A), if P(A) > 0. What happens if P(A) = 0? Then A = φ. P(B | A) is not defined in this case. In general, P(A) = P(A | S) When information given about event A is trivial (A is a sure event), conditional probability of B, given A is same as unconditional probability of B, since no extra information is provided.
Some useful Results Result 1: P(AB) = P(A).P(B | A) = P(B).P(A | B) Result 2: P(A) = P(B).P(A | B) + P(Bc).P(A| Bc) Use: Helps in updating our belief about chance of occurrence of random events, given additional information.
An Application in Medical Science Following information are given: 1. P(a doctor diagnose disease X correctly) = 0.60 2. P(a patient will die by his treatment after correct diagnosis) = 0.40; 3. P(patient will die by his treatment after wrong diagnosis) = 0.70; Question 1: What is P(patient will die) ? Call B = doctor diagnose disease X correctly Then, Bc=doctor diagnose wrongly Given that P(B) = 0.60; we have P(Bc) = 1 – P(B) = 0.40.
Call A = patient will die. To find P(A). Given: P(A | B) = 0.40, and P(A | Bc) = 0.70. Then P(A) = P(B).P(A|B) + P(Bc).P(A| Bc) = (0.60)(0.40) + (0.40).(0.70) = 0.24 + 0.28 = 0.52 How do we update our prior belief? Suppose we now know that the person (with disease X) died; Question 2: What is the probability that his disease was diagnosed correctly?
Without knowing anything extra, this is P(doctor diagnosed correctly) = P(B) = 0.60 But now we know that the person had died (i.e., event A has already occurred). Given this extra information, what is P(B)? [should we expect it to be less now?] Conditional probability of B, given A = P(B | A) = P(A and B) / P(A) =P(B).P(A | B) / P(A) = (0.60)(0.40)/(0.52) = 0.46 ( Bayes’ Theorem)
Bayes’ Theorem Suppose B1, B2, …, Bk form a partition of S. Then for any event A which is known to have occurred, we have, for any i=1,2,...,k, P(Bi | A) = P(Bi) P(A|Bi) / P(A), where P(A) = P(B1).P(A | B1) + P(B2).P(A | B2) + …. + P(Bk).P(A | Bk). Note: A can occur only if one of B1, B2, …, Bk occurs; knowing A had occurred we now take a fresh look at the initial events B1, B2, …, Bk and examine if we have to update our prior belief about their occurrences. Posterior probabilities of B1, B2, …, Bk
Statistical Independence of Events • A and B are mutually independent events if (and only if) P(AB) = P(A).P(B) 2a) A, B and C are pair-wise independent events if P(AB) = P(A).P(B); P(AC) = P(A).P(C) and P(BC) = P(B).P(C). 2b) A, B and C are mutually independent if, in addition, we also have P(ABC) = P(A).P(B).P(C) Note: If A and B independent, the so are Ac and Bc. Use: Helps in calculation of probabilities
Another way to quantify uncertainty Random Variable: A real-valued function on S S = {HH, HT, TH, TT} X = Number of heads obtained If {HH} occurs, X = 2; If {HT} occurs, X = 1; If {TH} occurs, X = 1: If {TT} occurs, X = 0. X takes 3 values: 0, 1, and 2 X is a random variable. Are all values of X equally probable? May be not, even if simple events are !
Consider equally likely simple events: P(HH) = P(HT) = P(TH) = P(TT) = ¼. Then P(X=0) = P(TT) = ¼ , P(X=1) = P(HT) + P(TH) = ½ , and P(X=2) = P(HH) = ¼ Total Probability = ¼ + ½ + ¼ = 1 Probability distribution of X:
Mean and Variance of a distribution Mean = E(X) = Sum(value*Probability) = 0. ¼ + 1. ½ + 2. ¼ = 1 Variance = Sum 1 – Square of Mean Sum1 = Sum(value-squared*probability) = 0. ¼ + 1. ½ + 4. ¼ = 1.5 Variance = 1.5 – 1 = 0.5 Standard deviation = SQRT(Variance) = SQRT(0.5) = 0.707
What if simple events are not equally likely? With P(H) = 1/3 and P(T) = 2/3, we get P(HH)=1/9, P(HT) = P(TH) = 2/9, P(TT) = 4/9 Now P(X=0) = P(TT) = 4/9 P(X=1) = P(HT) + P(TH) = 4/9 P(X=2) = 1/9 Prob. Distribution of X(=no. of heads): Mean & Variance: Similar
Expected Utility Theory Some Math preliminaries: 1. Function: y=f(x) is a mapping between two sets of elements ( or numbers) Example: Y=a + bx : linear function Or, Y = a + bx + cx2 : second degree etc. 2. Optimization (maxima & minima) of a function: Differentiable function: f ’(x) = 0: solve for x (say x = x0) f ”(x) at x=x0 is negative: f(x) is maximum at x = x0 f ”(x) at x=x0 is positive: f(x) is minimum at x = x0
In decision making under uncertainty, a decision d may lead to several levels of wealth: w1, w2, …, wk, with corresponding probs. p1, p2, …, pk, total prob.=sum(pi) = 1. Wealth is usually transformed into consumption, and hence utility (for example, in a business decision, it may be profit of the company) Utility function over wealth: u(w) Different levels of utility: u(w1), u(w2),.., u(wk) These are random quantities, with respective probalilities p1, p2, …, pk.
Expected Utility of a decision d E(u(d)) = average of these utilities = u(w1).p1 + u(w2).p2 +… + u(wk).pk An optimal decision d depends on: a) Optimization of expected utility b) Choice of the utility function u(w)
Some Applications Example 1(Dilemma of a Contractor) A contractor has to choose one of the two contracting jobs:both having chances of labour problems (say, strike). Profit possibilities: Job1: 10K if no strike, 2K if strike Job 2: 20K if no strike, 0.5K if strike Chance of strike: P(strike in Job 1) = ¼ ; P(no strike) = ¾ P(strike in Job 2) = ½ ; P(no strike) = ½
Expected Profit from Job 1 = (10000)(3/4) + (2000)(1/4) = 8,000 Expected Profit from Job 2 = (20000)(1/2) + (500)(1/2) = 10,250 Want to maximize your profit ? Choose Job 2 !
Any other consideration for his choice? What if he is a born pessimist? Expects the worst: there will be a strike! Choose Job 1: it maximizes his minimum profit. What if he is an optimist? Expects no strike or neglects the chance of it Choose Job 2: it may give him 20,000 Anything else?
Chance of strike not known ! How does he choose? Go for a randomized decision rule: Choose Job 1 with prob. p and Job 2 with prob. (1-p) such that his profit must be same whether he chooses Job 1 or Job 2 and whether there is a strike or not. His profit is: A = 10000 p + 20000 (1-p) if no strike; B = 2000 p + 500 (1-p) if strike; Find p such that A = B; p > 1(check); Can’t be ! So p = 1. Choose Job 1 !!
Back to Utility Function and expected utility E(u(d)) = expected utility for decision d and utility function u(w) = u(w1).p1 + u(w2).p2 +… + u(wk).pk Different Choices of u(w): • u(w) = √w : risk averse • u(w) = w2 : risk seeker • u(w) = w : risk neutral For a given u(w), choose a decision that maximizes the expected utility
Example 2: An investment decision problem(Ex. 1.22; Aliprantis-Chakrabarti) To invest $10,000 in stocks/bonds Return rate of stock: 2% with prob. 0.37 & 10% with prob. 0.63 Return of Bond: 7% with certainty Individual is Risk-averse: utility function is u(w) = √w How much to invest in stocks? Say a fraction ‘s’ of the total investment.
Investor has a chance 0.37 of getting an amount (10,000 s)(1.02) + 10,000(1-s)(1.07) =10,000(1.07 – 0.05 s) And a chance 0.63 of getting the amount (10,000 s)1.10 + 10,000(1-s)(1.07) =10,000(1.07 + 0.03 s) Investor’s expected utility (risk-averse !) is E(s) = 0.37 √10000(1.07 – 0.05 s) + 0.63 √10000(1.07 + 0.03 s) Choose s such that E(s) is maximum; s=56.9% Invest $5690 in stocks &$4310 in Bonds.
Example 3:Choice between two stocks (Ex.1.23 (Aliprantis & Chakrabarti): $10,000 to invest between two stocks S & M Probability Table for Returns from S & M
Invest proportion ‘s’ in stock S and proportion (1-s) in stock M With 5% return from stock S and 20% from M: Wealth = w1 = 10000 s.1.05 + 10000(1-s).1.20 = 10000(1.20 – 0.15 s) { this event has probability = 0.40} With 5% from S and 5% from M: Wealth = w2 = 10000.1.05 { probability = 0.1} With 20% from S and 20% from M: Wealth = w3 = 10000.1.20 { probability = 0.1} With 20% from S and 5% from M: Wealth = w4 = 10000(1.05 + 0.15 s) { probability= 0.4}
For risk averse, utility function u(w) = √w Expected utility = E(s) = Sum{(√w1)(0.40) + (√w2)(0.10) + (√w3)(0.10) + (√w4)(0.40)} = 40 √(1.2 – 0.15 s) + 40 √(1.05 +0.15 s) + 10 √1.05 + 10 √1.20 Choose ‘s’ so that E(s) is maximum S = 0.5 = 50% Decision for Risk averse: Invest 50% ($5000) in Stock S and 50% ($5000) in Stock M. A Question for you: What happens if he is risk seeker or risk neutral?
Some remarks Are decisions always based on expected utility? Possibly not; consider the following lotteries: L1: Receive $2 million with certainty L2: Receive $10 million with prob. 0.15, $2 m with prob. 0.75 & $ 0 with prob. 0.10 L3: Receive $2 million with prob. 0.25 and $0 with prob. 0.75 L4: Receive $10 million with prob. 0.15 and $0 with prob. 0.85 Choose one between L1 and L2 and one between L3 and L4
If L1 is chosen over L2, then u(2) > 0.15 u(10) + 0.75 u(2) + 0.10 u(0) Add 0.75 u(0) to both side and get 0.25 u(2) + 0.75 u(0) > 0.15 u(10) + 0.85 u(0) i.e., expected utility for L3 > expected utility for L4 So we should choose L3 over L4 Do you agree? I don’t !
Violations of the expected utility theory Lotteries and Gambling If by paying a small amount one has a chance of winning a large amount, individuals often ignore the negative expected payoff, as the loss is small. BUT If potential loss is larger, the same individual may choose very differently preference reversal in decision making
Suggested Reading • Statistical Methods in Business and Social Sciences: Shenoy, G.V. & Pant, M. (Macmillan India Limited) • Games and Decision Making: Aliprantis, C.D. & Chakrabarti, S.K. (Oxford University Press) • •Complete Business Statistics: Aczel, A.D. & Sounderpandian, J. – Fifth Edition (Tata McGraw-Hill)