180 likes | 324 Views
Civil Liberties and the 1 st Amendment. The Bill of Rights and the State. Barron v. Baltimore (1833) While the Bill of Rights protected the people from the national government -- not state governments . The Fourteenth Amendment (1868) “No State Shall …” Slaughter House Cases (1873)
E N D
The Bill of Rights and the State • Barron v. Baltimore (1833) • While the Bill of Rights protected the people from the national government -- not state governments. • The Fourteenth Amendment (1868) • “No State Shall …” • Slaughter House Cases (1873) • Privileges and immunities clause • Incorporation Theory • Selective v. Total
Religion • Establishment : “Congress shall make no law regarding the establishment of religion.” • Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) • Activity must: 1. Have a secular, nonreligious purpose; 2. Neither advance a religion nor discourage the practice of religion; 3. avoid “excessive government entanglement with religion” • Free Exercise: No law “Prohibiting the free exercise of religion” • Government can regulate when practices are incongruent with public policy • What's Allowed: • Use of the Bible for secular study • religious student organizations (funding) • Student prayer and religious study • Teacher bible study • Opening prayers for public meetings
Court decisions • Government may issue vouchers for parochial schools – Zelman v. Simmons (2002) • Can’t forbid teaching evolution - Epperson v. AK • forbids compelling students to recite prayers – Engel v. Vitale (1962) • Clergy may not lead prayers at graduation ceremonies – Lee v. Weisman (1992) • Polygamy outlawed due to violation of health, safety, and morals of the community – Reynolds v. U.S. (1879) • State benefits denied for use of Peyote – Oregon v. Smith (1990) • City of Boerne v. Flores – states retain authority preempted by RFRA – (1997) • No student led prayer over PA system at extra curricular activities - Santa Fe ISO v. Doe (2000) • Court decisions have also prohibited recitation of verse, the teaching of creationism, and teacher led Bible study
Current Issues • Can a religious organization be sued for employment discrimination? • Hosanna-Tabor vs. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission: ministerial exception • Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses of the First Amendment bar suits brought on behalf of ministers against their churches, claiming termination in violation of employment discrimination laws • Can a religious organization be compelled to provide services they consider morally offensive? • “Obamacare” contraception mandate --7 States suing over the rule • all insurers will be required to provide "preventive health services." • A religious employer who objects to treatment aimed at prevention of pregnancy may leave it out provided: (1) It has religious inculcation as its primary duty; (2) It primarily employs people of the same faith; and (3) It primarily serves people of the same faith • Religious leaders and political opponents argue its a unconst. intrusion
Freedom of Assembly • Free assembly as important as free press and free speech • Freedom of assembly includes the right to parade and hold demonstrations in public places, • Must get a permit. • May be limited. • Demonstrations are not allowed on private property • interferes with property rights
Free Press vs. Prior restraint • Government censorship of information before it is published • Near v. Minnesota (1931) – Gangsters and Grafters • MN law prohibited publication of “Malicious, scandalous, or defamatory” info • Court ruled 5-4 that law must be voided because it involved prior restraint • Pentagon Papers: NYT Co. v. U.S. (1971) – Credibility Gap • DOE official leaked documents, some secret, revealing gov’t lies about Vietnam • Court ruled in favor of publication 6-3 … emphasized the need to bar the gov’t from hiding embarrassing and harmful info • Government may use prior restraint if in the interest of national security
Free Press Issues • The Founders viewed the press strictly as printed material; electronic media had not yet been invented. • Radio and television less protected than press media • Natural conflict between 1st and 6th Amendments • “Court of public opinion” • FCC regulates radio and television. • Cannot censor broadcasts but may set standards. • Movies and the Internet are protected by free press guarantees. • Communities may regulate obscenity within acceptable limits • Refusal to display, sell, or screen material is legal • Advertising receives less protection than political speech. • commercial speech trumped by protection of the public
What reasonable consequences might one face for their expression
Freedom of Expression • Types of Expression: • Pure speech: spoken word, verbal expression • Symbolic speech: expressive action • Seditious Speech: challenges authority • Defamatory speech: false speech • Slander: spoken • Libel: written • Obscenity: offensive speech • Commercial Speech • Political Speech
Is it reasonable to expect privacy on social networking sites?
Should allowing access to your Facebook account be a condition of employment?
Right to Privacy? • Constitutional Right? • Not Enumerated: • 1st, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 9th Amendment • Griswold and Roe • Katz • 4th protects people not places • Dissent: 4th refers to tangible items
Cases • Olmstead v. US (1929) • Eavesdropping in public area • Katz v. U.S. (1967) • Expectation of privacy in public (people not places) • Griswold v. Conn. (1965) • Use of contraception (consenting adults in the home) • Roe v. Wade (1973) • Right to abortion protected • Ouinlan (1976) & Cruzan (1990) cases • Right to refuse treatment, must have “clear and convincing evidence” it was their wish • Washington v. Glucksburg (1997) • No right to suicide • Lawrence v. Texas (2003) • Sodomy laws unconstitutional (consenting adults in the home) • Gonzales v. Oregon (2006) • Legality of physician assisted suicide left to states