1 / 19

Does Culture Effect Life Insurance Consumption?—With Evidence from Mainland China

Does Culture Effect Life Insurance Consumption?—With Evidence from Mainland China. WANYAN Ruiyun, YE Xiaolan and CHEN Tao School of insurance Southwestern University of Finance and Economics. Outline. Research Purpose and Importance Cultural dimensions Questionnaire survey

mala
Download Presentation

Does Culture Effect Life Insurance Consumption?—With Evidence from Mainland China

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Does Culture Effect Life Insurance Consumption?—With Evidence from Mainland China WANYAN Ruiyun, YE Xiaolan and CHEN Tao School of insurance Southwestern University of Finance and Economics

  2. Outline • Research Purpose and Importance • Cultural dimensions • Questionnaire survey • Research Methodology and Data • Regression Results • Findings

  3. Research purpose and its importance(1) • This cross-disciplinary study examines the way culture affects consumption patterns of life insurance across Chinese provinces.

  4. Figure 1 The National Income and Life Insurance Density in China, 2011

  5. Research purpose and its importance(2) • In China, studies have been conducted to investigate the effect of economic and demographic determinants on life insurance demand. But these findings have their limitations.

  6. Research purpose and its importance(3) • Because of the uncertainty and ambiguity inherent in the life insurance product, consumers are more likely to respond according to their cultural practice. (Crosby and Stephens, 1987) • There are studies on Hofstede’ cultural dimensions in mainland China, but few of them are related to life insurance consumption.

  7. Cultural dimensions • According to Hofstede(1983), we divided the culture into four dimensions: • Power Distance Index (PDI). Power distance index is the inequality of power distribution accepted by a society. • Individualism Index (IDV). Individualism refers to the loose social relationships. In such society, people take care of their nuclear family. • Masculinity/femininity index (MAI). • Uncertainty avoidance index (UAI). The uncertainty avoidance index assesses the extent to which people feel threatened by uncertainty and ambiguity, and try to avoid these situations.

  8. Questionnaire survey • The questionnaires are sampled at random. We authorize some companies to conduct the survey in 31provinces across mainland China. Up till now, we have got 37639 (1200 for each province) valid feedbacks.

  9. [1]Source: http://geert-hofstede.com/china.html。

  10. Research Methodology • We use the panel data of 31 provinces across China from 1999-2010, analyze the effect of cultural differences on life insurance consumption there, so as to find out whether the culture in mainland China has significant effect on life insurance consumption. • Method: Pooled EGLS

  11. Source of Data

  12. Hypothesis • Hypothesis 1: The life insurance consumption is negatively related to the level of power distance. • Hypothesis 2: The life insurance consumption is negatively related to the level of individualism. • Hypothesis 3: The life insurance consumption is positively related to the level of uncertainty avoidance.

  13. Equation

  14. Regression Results (1)

  15. Regression Results (2)

  16. Findings Cultural dimensions are significantly related to the difference in life insurance consumption. • Power distance plays a significantly negative role in explaining the regional differences in life insurance consumption. But its coefficient is comparatively small • Individualism does not show significant effect. • The masculinity/femininity index is significantly positive. • Somewhat surprising is the negative significance of uncertainty-avoidance dimension.

  17. Further Discussion • Our study has some limitations. First, because of data availability problems, we do not include in our analysis all the variables that may affect life insurance consumption, such as institutional variables, the level of education, and pricing variables. Second, the questionnaire does not have enough samples, which needs to be enlarged in the future, so as to better support our findings.

  18. Thank you and Questions?

More Related