70 likes | 177 Views
What have we learned from youth development research and evaluations in the past 10 years?. JOSEPH L. MAHONEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT IRVINE. Prepared for a discussion of the 10-Year Follow-Up to “Community Programs to Promote Youth Development” Washington, DC
E N D
What have we learned from youth development research and evaluations in the past 10 years? JOSEPH L. MAHONEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT IRVINE Prepared for a discussion of the 10-Year Follow-Up to “Community Programs to Promote Youth Development” Washington, DC May 2, 2011
Theoretical and Meta-theoretical Advances • Informs, and informed by, a person-in-context systems perspective to development • A guide to developing and conducting research • Recognition of the need to study out-of-school contexts • Useful in making sense of discrepant findings • Development and refinement of multiple theoretical perspectives • Positive Youth Development; Routine Activity Theory; Expectancy-Value Theory; Person-Stage-Environment Fit; Flow/Optimal Experiences; Attachment Theory; Social Control Theory, etc.
General Advances • Research and Evaluation • Exponential increase in quantity • Increase in methodological quality and rigor (often) • Policy • Federal and State initiatives • Congressional After-school Caucus (2005); Interagency Working Group on Youth Programs (2008); Advocacy groups; Political platforms • Education and Practice • Coursework and training • After-school networks • Program quality • Professional development
Methodological Advancements • Theories of Change • Logic models • Defining and Measuring Key Constructs • E.g., Participation, Program quality • Selection, Barriers, and Attractors • E.g., National Evaluation of the 21stCCLCs • Immigrant families • Getting and keeping teens involved • Complex comparison groups • Value of Longitudinal Studies • Mixed methods to understand process • Importance of sustained participation • Enduring benefits (or risks)
Youth Development Advancements • WHO and WHERE?: Impacts are Relative • Types of activities/programs and features of settings • Person-level differences • Context-level moderators • WHAT?: A Broad Range of Outcomes • E.g., PYD; Physical health • Where to expect change? • HOW MUCH?: Often Little Impact • Small effects are often reported • Change takes time • Quality is important, modifiable, and largely unknown
More to Learn… “… after-school research can advance by assessing outcomes in consideration of the many factors that might affect program impact. We need more data on all of the following issues: Who does what to whom, in what ways, in what types of settings, within what broader context; what level of participation or engagement is needed by which populations to achieve what types of outcomes, and what are the most effective ways to improve current programs?” -Durlak, Mahoney, Bohnert, & Parente (2010)
What I Wonder About… • Does it make sense to identify “key studies” over the past 10 years that would parallel those outlined in the 2002 volume? • How much have the “8 features” been informed by research over the last 10 years? Does the list still hold? • To what extent does the science actually inform practice? • What sorts of national policies would be best to support the out-of-school needs of today’s youth? • How do we prepare educators to provide quality programming? • Why so little work on youth programs and development in the summertime?