1 / 13

Closing in on Black Holes – why this conference is important for me

Paul Murdin Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge. Closing in on Black Holes – why this conference is important for me. Black holes as theoretical entities. John Michell 1783; Pierre Laplace 1796 Posed a theoretical question about a star

mali
Download Presentation

Closing in on Black Holes – why this conference is important for me

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Paul Murdin Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge Closing in on Black Holes – why this conference is important for me

  2. Black holes as theoretical entities • John Michell 1783; Pierre Laplace 1796 • Posed a theoretical question about a star • At what radius of star, like the Sun, would the escape velocity exceed the speed of light? • Karl Schwarzchild 1915; Roy Kerr 1963 • Calculation in general relativity of the gravitational field of a point or spherical mass, with/without rotation • Well-developed solutions looking for their problem

  3. Does nature make stellar black holes? • S. Chandrasekhar 1930 • Maximum mass of (Newtonian) self gravitating stars supported by degenerate electron pressure (white dwarfs) • J. R. Oppenheimer and G. Volkoff 1939 • Ditto for general relativity and a neutron fluid (neutron stars) • “..unlikely that static neutron cores can play any great part in stellar evolution” • (However: Bell 1967: pulsars) • J.R. Oppenheimer and H. Snyder 1939 • Neutron star’s “continued gravitational contraction,” asymptotically to the gravitational radius • → Possibly Nature does make black holes, yes • (but Nature doesn’t make neutron stars! – not a confidence-enhancing, mistaken judgement)

  4. Do stellar black holes exist? • X-ray sources • Luminosities imply accretion • Temperatures imply accretion on to a compact object like a neutron star or black hole • Rocket and balloon-borne detectors: Cygnus XR-1 • Huge positional uncertainty • Uhuru 1971 reduced positional uncertainty of Cygnus X-1 • Hjellming and Wade 1971; Braes and Miley 1971: radio source with precise position • Optical ID with HDE226868 • Correlated variability in X-ray/radio/optical effectively settled the identification • But a post hoc argument

  5. Cyg X-1 - can we definitively say it is a neutron star or black hole? • Uhuru 1971 X-ray fluctuations at ~10 Hz frequencies → neutron star • Webster and Murdin 1971, Bolton 1971 HDE 228868 with a massive companion (>6 Msun), so not a neutron star → BH • Pringle and Rees 1972 → quasi periodic oscillations at inner edge of accretion disc • So black hole found? or some other sort of star with an unexplained small source of X-rays?

  6. How close is the evidence to the black hole? • Cygnus X-1 • Variability at 100 light milliseconds • Companion at 0.2 AU • Evidence is 1,000 to 1,000,000 Schwarzchild radii from the black hole • Evidence connecting Cygnus X-1 to a black hole has weak points • It is credible and consistent to say that Cyg X-1 is a black hole, but not, as far as I can see, unassailable • Perhaps this conference will tell me differently

  7. Does nature make massive black holes? • Martin Rees 1971 • Routes to a massive black hole • Looks like nature can indeed make them

  8. Identifications of galactic black holes • Seyfert 1943 – explosive nuclei • Dent 1965 – variability with 1 year, < 1 l.y. extent • Salpeter, Zeldovich 1964 – powered by accretion onto black hole? • Lynden Bell 1971 – consistent physical model • Redhead, Cohen, Blandford 1978 – aligned jets from radio sources, maintained by rotating black hole • Richstone, Kormendy … 1990-95 • large “black masses” in quiescent galaxies • Miyoshi et al. 1995, many others • NGC 4258 contains a central mass of 3×107 Mo • Genzel 1996, Ghez 1998 • mass of Galaxy’s black hole by motion of a star cluster is 3×106 Mo

  9. How close is the evidence to the black hole? • Galactic centre • S2 is 2×1010 km distant • 1,000 Schwarzchild radii • Evidence connecting these phenomena to a black hole is circumstantial • It is credible and consistent to say that they are, but this evidence is not unassailable • However…

  10. Close to a black hole • High speeds • special relativity • e.g. relativistic beaming • Strong gravitational fields • general relativity • e.g. gravitational redshift • The MCG–6-30-15 Fe line profile provides the direct connection with the BH Schwarzchild radius (1995) • Very strong and convincing evidence, now very robust • Likewise for galactic sources? Not so robust? Tanaka et al., 1995

  11. Black hole history - a cynical view of astronomers, from the 1970’s R McCray 1977

  12. Black hole history now – a positive view Astronomers investigate and their ideas clash Viewing boundary The indifferent and the ignorant Imagination and new technology sees what lies inside Boundary of interest

  13. I hope to learn more…

More Related