ESMD SI Workshop: Day 2 Calibration SI Options & Splinter Analysis

1. ESMD SI Workshop:Day 2 CalibrationSI Options & Splinter Analysis

2. ESMD SE&I Strategy TeamBenchmarking Workshop Process Pre-Workshop Wed 15Dec AM Wed PM Thu 16Dec Thu PM Splinter 1 Policy Splinter End State Option Synthesis 1 Statutory, Regulatory, Policy Assessment Additional Inputs Splinter 2 Transition Splinter End State Option Synthesis 2 Transition, Cost and Schedule Tactical Assessment Invited Orientation Briefings Splinter Team Briefouts Session Briefouts Read Aheads Adjourn Option Evaluation Acquisition Splinter • NRC Report • Strategy Team Options Splinter 3 Contract Type, Teaming Structure, Incentive Design Assessment Evaluation Criteria Development Tue 14Dec PM Evaluate Options for Day 2 Focus SE&I Strategy Team Executive Session SE&I Strategy Team • Benchmarking Site Visit Summaries

3. Workshop Agenda –Thursday Morning, 16 Dec 04

4. Workshop Agenda –Thursday Morning, 16 Dec 04

5. Workshop Agenda – Thursday Morning & Afternoon, 16 Dec 04

6. 8:00 am Thursday 16 Dec 04Options Evaluation Splinter Session Orientation

7. Splinter Session: Options EvaluationThe Promenade Room, The Plaza, Salon III • Session objectives: This team will evaluate strengths/weaknesses of Options 1-4, and will propose actions that can be taken to ensure that these options are enabled. • Option 1: Apollo Model – Tier A-C SETA, “Prime of Primes” • Option 2: Tier A-D SETA with HW Partial Exclusion • Option 3: Tier A-D Independent Organization SETA • Option 4: NAVSEA “Nested” MAIT Model • Session leadership: • The Promenade • Betsy Park (facilitator) • Richard Beatty (recorder • Salon III • Chris Crumbly (facilitator) • Robert Shishko (recorder) • The Plaza • Dale Thomas (facilitator) • Louise Hamlin (recorder)

8. Vision Requires System-of-Systems Integration The Human: an Essential Element of the System of Systems Crew Surface Transport Crew Landing Mobility Support Systems Comm/Nav Launch Transit and Launch Systems Surface and Orbital Systems Biomedical Countermeasures and Limits Telescope Mars Pre-Positioned Long-Duration Candidates Candidates Propellants Habitation Surface Power and Resource Identification and Characterization Outer Moons Candidates Resource Utilization Supporting Research Technology Options Commonality/Evolvability For Future Missions

9. Constellation Definition • Develop, demonstrate, and deploy successive generations of capabilities to enable the sustained human and robotic exploration of the Moon, Mars, and beyond. • Capability to be developed will form a system-of-systems that includes: • Crew Transportation Systems • Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV) • CEV Launch Vehicle • Cargo Transportation Systems • Surface Systems • In-Space Systems • Ground Systems • Humans as a Critical System

10. Prime Prime Prime Option 1 (Apollo Model)Tier A-C: Centralized Gov’t with SETA / Tier D: “Prime of Primes” ESMD Tier A Agency Alignment Supporting Integration Contractor (Bellcom- Type SETA) ESMD Tier B Div Integration & Req’s Validation LOCATED @ DC Metro Area Common Functional Office Structure LOCATED @ NASA HQ ESMD Tier C Development Div Prog. Integration Prg Cont SE&I Test Ops S&MA ESMD Tier D Constellation Spiral 2 Program Spiral 1 Program Prg Cont SE&I Test Ops S&MA Prg Cont SE&I Test Ops S&MA Project Office Prime of Primes Project Office LOCATED @ NASA Centers LOCATED @ Contractor Facilities Project Office Project Office

11. Prime Prime Prime Option 2Tier A-D: Centralized Gov’t with HW Partial-Excluded SETA ESMD Tier A Agency Alignment Supporting Integration Contractor (SETA with Partial HW Exclusion) ESMD Tier B Div Integration & Req’s Validation LOCATED @ DC Metro Area LOCATED @ NASA HQ ESMD Tier C Development Div Prog. Integration ESMD Tier D Constellation Spiral 2 Program Spiral 1 Program Project Office Prime Project Office LOCATED @ NASA Centers LOCATED @ Contractor Facilities Project Office Project Office

12. Option 3Tier A-D: Centralized Gov’t with Independent Org SETA ESMD Tier A Agency Alignment Independent Established Organization (UARC) Or (FFRDC) ESMD Tier B Div Integration & Req’s Validation LOCATED @ DC Metro Area LOCATED @ NASA HQ ESMD Tier C Development Div Prog. Integration ESMD Tier D Constellation Spiral 2 Program Spiral 1 Program Project Office Prime Project Office LOCATED @ NASA Centers Prime LOCATED @ Contractor Facilities Project Office Prime Project Office Prime

13. Option 4 (Virginia Class NAVSEA Model)Tier A-D: “Nested” Major-Area Integration Teams ESMD MAIT Tier A Tier B Tier C Tier D S-o-S MAIT ESMD Tier A Agency Alignment ESMD Tier B Div Integration & Req’s Validation LOCATED @ NASA HQ ESMD Tier C Development Div Prog. Integration ESMD Tier D Constellation S-o-S Design/Build MAIT S-o-S MAIT LOCATED @ DC Metro Area PO Pri Pri PO Spiral 2 Program Spiral 1 Program PO Pri PO Pri Segment 1 MAIT Project Office Prime Segment MAIT “Virtual” SI Decision Teams Primes LOCATED @ Contractor Facilities Project Office LOCATED @ NASA Centers Prime Segment 2 MAIT Project Office Prime Project Office Prime

14. Option 4 Example MAJOR AREA TEAMS SYSTEM INTEGRATION TEAMS Sail Command & Control Systems Module Habitability Non-Pressure Hull Stern Pressure Hull Auxiliary Machinery Room Weapons Stowage & Handling *Ref: presentation by George M. Drakeley, Deputy Program Manager, Virginia Class Submarine Program Office, to the Constellation Organization Discipline Team, 15-May-2004.

15. 8:00 am Thursday 16 Dec 04Policy/Transition/Acq Strategy Splinter Session Orientation

16. Splinter Session: Policy Splinter The Promenade Room • Session objectives: this team will identify policy, regulatory, and statutory issues associated with the target End State Option(s) identified during the orientation. • What are the obstacles that lie in the path to standing up the End State organization? • What new authorities, if any, will NASA require in order to establish the End State SoSE&I organization? The more specific, the better! • Are there other organizations that have executed a similar transition, or which have obtained and implemented such policies/authorities? What successes and problems were encountered? • Session leadership: • Betsy Park (facilitator) • Richard Beatty (recorder)

17. Policy

18. Splinter Session: Program Transition Impacts Splinter Salon III • Session objectives: this team will identify key aspects for NASA to consider in transitioning from the Near/Mid-Term SoSE&I organization to the End State Option(s). • These aspects could include anticipated cost and schedule drivers and specific tasks/tactics that NASA should plan for. • A key consideration to be discussed is how NASA can retain the corporate knowledge and experienced personnel built up during the Near/Mid-Term five year time frame. • What is the level of participation with the government team necessary to ensure a good handoff of SoSE&I responsibilities? • Are there other organizations that have executed a similar transition? What successes and problems were encountered? • Session leadership: • Chris Crumbly (facilitator) • Robert Shishko (recorder)

19. Program Transition Impacts

20. Splinter Session: Acquisition Strategy Splinter The Plaza Room • Session objectives: this team will identify key aspects of the acquisition strategy NASA should pursue to implement the End State Option(s). These aspects should include, at a minimum: • Recommended contract and solicitation type; • Desirable industry partnering/teaming arrangements; • Contractor hardware exclusions (full, partial, none), and specific features or such exclusions (the more detail here the better!); • Arrangements for SoSE&I organization/contractor handling of Exploration system/element hardware prime contractor proprietary/sensitive data; • Design of incentives. • Transition strategy. • Session leadership: • Dale Thomas (facilitator) • Louise Hamlin (recorder)

21. Acquisition Strategy

22. Great Work So Far!!Keep Collaborating!