1 / 65

Dental Early Intervention in North Carolina

Dental Early Intervention in North Carolina. Rebecca King, DDS, MPH Chief, Oral Health Section NC Division of Public Health, DHHS 919-707-5487 Rebecca.King@ncmail.net. Turn of the Century. 1910 -- Dr. RM Squires: function ... prevent rather than cure

Download Presentation

Dental Early Intervention in North Carolina

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Dental Early Intervention in North Carolina Rebecca King, DDS, MPH Chief, Oral Health Section NC Division of Public Health, DHHS 919-707-5487 Rebecca.King@ncmail.net

  2. Turn of the Century • 1910 --Dr. RM Squires: function ... prevent rather than cure • 1918 – NC Dental Society gets legislative funding • Reduce pain and infection • Educate on importance of oral health

  3. Oral Health Section Staff • 6 Public health dentists • 58 Public health dental hygienists • 3 Health educators • 3 Equipment technicians • Support staff

  4. Oral Health Section Regions and Staff Assignments Central 10 Hygienists 4 Local Hygienists 22 Counties CAM- DEN ALLE- GHANY CURRITUCK GATES NORTH- AMPTON ASHE WARREN SURRY HERT- FORD STOKES ROCKING- HAM CASWELL VANCE PER- QUIMANS PERSON PASQUO- TANK GRAN- VILLE HALIFAX WATAUGA WILKES CHO- WAN ORANGE BERTIE MITCHELL YADKIN FORSYTH FRANKLIN AVERY GUILFORD YAN- CEY CALDWELL NASH ALEX- ANDER ALA- MANCE DURHAM EDGE- COMBE DAVIE WASH- INGTON MADISON IREDELL DAVID- SON DARE MARTIN TYRRELL WAKE BURKE WILSON BUN- COMBE CHATHAM RANDOLPH HAY- WOOD CATAWBA MCDOWELL BEAU- FORT PITT ROWAN SWAIN HYDE JOHNSTON LINCOLN RUTHER- FORD GREENE LEE GRAHAM HENDER- SON CABARRUS JACK- SON WAYNE HARNETT CLEVE- LAND MONT- GOMERY TRAN- SYLVANIA GASTON LENOIR MOORE STANLY POLK MACON CHEROKEE CRAVEN MECKLEN- BURG PAM- LICO CLAY JONES SAMPSON CUMBER- LAND RICH- MOND HOKE DUPLIN UNION ANSON SCOT- LAND CARTERET ONSLOW Western 21 Hygienists 1 Field Dentist 2 Local Hygienists 40 Counties ROBESON BLADEN PENDER NEW HANOVER COLUMBUS BRUNSWICK Eastern 19 Hygienists 1 Field Dentist 1 Local Hygienist 38 Counties Hygienists Field Dentists Supervisors Local Hygienists Under State Supervision Revised 9/05

  5. Program Components • Dental disease prevention • Oral health assessment • Dental health education and promotion • Access to dental care • Dental public health residency

  6. 1 Dental Disease Prevention • Water fluoridation • Preschool dental preventive programs • Dental sealants • Fluoride mouthrinse

  7. Water Fluoridation NC: 85% on municipal water supplies receive the benefits of water fluoridation

  8. Preschool Dental Preventive Programs Much more later.

  9. Dental Sealants • Statewide goal is 50% - a top OHS priority • OHS target population • K-3 high-risk children • 15,000 per year • Fifth graders with sealants increased from 28% (1996) to 44% (2006)

  10. Fluoride Mouthrinse • School-based program from mid-1970s to 2002 • Increasingly targeted in early 1990s • Discontinued due to budget cuts and lack of recent data

  11. Fluoride Mouthrinse Resurgence • Survey data showed decreased disparities • Obtained expansion budget funding in 2006 • Targeting schools with highest decay rates who promise compliance • Plan to begin rinsing in January 2007

  12. 2 Oral HealthAssessment • Statewide dental surveys • Oral health surveillance

  13. Statewide Dental Surveys Provide evidence base for program: • Early 1960s • 1976-1977 • 1986-1987 • 2003-2004

  14. 2003-2004 Statewide Dental Survey • Sample: 8000 children K-12 • Study how well NC decay prevention programs are reducing decay • Measure • Disparities • Parents’ knowledge and opinions • How dental health affects quality of life • Results used for Section strategic planning

  15. Select Survey Findings • Rates of decay in preschoolers have deteriorated slightly. • Past improvements in decay rates in permanent teeth have leveled off. • Whites (19%) are least likely to have untreated decay, followed by blacks (30%), then “Others” (mostly Latinos) (38%). • Not including early decay (non-cavitated lesions) underestimates disease levels by 35-40%. • 40% do not think baby teeth are important.

  16. Trends in Untreated Decay in Permanent Teeth Percent Year NC OHS Statewide Dental Survey Data

  17. Oral Health Surveillance Calibrated dental assessments • By PH RDHs • Grades K and 5 • County oral health status data • Referral for treatment needs

  18. Surveillance Results • 21% K, 5% fifth graders have untreated decay • Proportion of kindergartners who have had tooth decay has increasing, maybe leveling off • Proportion of fifth graders who have had tooth decay is low but fluctuating • Fifth graders with sealants increased from 28% to 44% (1996-97 to 2005-06)

  19. 3 DentalHealth Education • School-based education and • Community outreach • Professional education • Educational materials

  20. School-based Education • 176,000 children thru classroom education • 16,600 Adults • Parent education • Teacher support • Also health professionals

  21. Exhibit Promotions Aging, consumerism, diabetes, careers, sealants, early childhood caries, fluorides, oral hygiene, nutrition, tobacco, injury prevention, OHS program

  22. 4 Access to Dental Care • Referral/follow-up for care • Improved access for low-income families • “Under direction” activities

  23. Oral Health Surveillance • Referral for treatment needs • >129,000 K,5 screened • Identified >28,400 in need of dental care • Helped get dental care for 10,800 • Additional 67,800 screened for sealants, GKAS! and at request of school nurses

  24. Improved Access • 1999 NC IOM Task Force on Dental Care Access had 23 recommendations, e.g. • Increased fees for Dental Medicaid services • Funding for physician-based dental preventive services • “Under Direction” • Medicaid Dental Advisory Committee (PAG) • Licensure by credentials • 2005 NC Oral Health Summit – latest update and new action steps

  25. 2006 Give Kids a Smile! • NC Dental Society initiative to provide free dental care for underprivileged children • To date: • 7000 volunteers • 54,000 children served • > $4 million free care • OHS PH Dental Hygienists screen and coordinate

  26. Local Dental Safety Net Clinics • OHS provides TA for new clinics • OHS provides temporary dentist coverage on limited basis • Number increased dramatically from the early 1990s to 114 fixed, mobile and “free” clinics in 2005

  27. 5 Dental Public Health Residency • Training for dental public • health specialists • Growth for the Division

  28. Preschool Dental Prevention Programs in North Carolina

  29. Smart Smiles An Appalachian RegionalCollaborative Partnership to Improve Dental Health

  30. The Beginning • Appalachian Regional Consortium/NC Partnership for Children/Smart Start health assessment (fall 1996) • 1/3 kindergarten children in western part of state had untreated decay • Primary need • reduce early childhood caries • improve dental health

  31. Motivating Assumptions • ECC is a serious public health problem • Its burden can be reduced through prevention targeted to very young, high risk children • Virtually all infants & toddlers obtain care at medical offices and it is a logical place to provide services

  32. Additional Assumptions • Physicians and their staff know that ECC is a problem and they are willing to help prevent it • Primary medical care providers need help to learn procedures and to implement them in their practices • Innovations must be evaluated for adoption rates, quality of care, clinical effectiveness, costs and political concerns

  33. Fluoride Varnish Safety and Effectiveness • Safe, easy to use and accepted • No studies of effectiveness in 1-2-year-olds • Emerging evidence of effectiveness in primary teeth of older children • Supported by a larger body of evidence • effective in permanent teeth • other topical fluoride applications are effective

  34. Local community leaders State and regional Smart Start agencies NC Oral Health Section UNC School of Dentistry UNC School of Public Health Ruth & Billy Graham Health Center Local health departments Pediatric offices Partners/Advisory Board

  35. Medical Community Preparation • Worked with licensing boards: • medical • dental • nursing • Sample standing orders

  36. Smart Smiles Preventive Package • Medical setting • targeted oral health education for caregivers • dental screening • fluoride varnish application • First visit ~ age 9 months • Repeat every 6 months until age 3

  37. Why Preventive Medical Model? • This is where young children are • Multiple services at one visit • Most general dentists uncomfortable seeing children this age • Interest and willingness of medical community • Few pediatric dentists • Treatment is expensive • This was the best idea anyone had

  38. Targets • Children, 9 - 36 months, high risk for caries. • Medical risk factors & socioeconomic indicators • families  200% Federal Poverty Level • medically compromised children • older siblings with poor oral health

  39. Challenges • Effectiveness • identifying the high risk children • getting them in for the service on a regular schedule • Financing • grant stipulated that providers provide service at no cost to patients • economics was an issue for medical practices

  40. Effectiveness Issues • Provide services to high risk children • 80-85% decay in 20-25% children • Begin prevention before decay begins (~ 9 months) • Provide services on a regular basis

  41. Finances Medicaid agreed to reimburse (July 1999) • Medical offices - required training, recognized Smart Smiles trainers • Six visits between 9 months and age 3 (90 day interval) • Reimburse for: • dental health education for parent/care-give • oral screening and referral for child • fluoride varnish application for child

  42. Smart Smiles Evaluation (8/2001) • $2.2 million, 5 year grant • NIDCR, National Institutes for Health • Effectiveness - does program reduce cavities? • Does it work in this setting? • Can we provide package frequently enough? • Data collection completed

  43. Smart Smiles Evaluation Aims • Short term effects on cavities (dmf scores) in 3-year-old children • Intermediate effects on cavity-related treatments, Medicaid costs, hospital use, and quality of life • Longer-term effects on cavities in 5-year-old children after 2-year gap in services

  44. Into The Mouths of Babes Statewide Medicaid Dental Prevention Program for Young Children

  45. Goals • Increase access to preventive dental care for low-income children • Reduce the prevalence of ECC in low-income children • Reduce the burden of treatment needs on a dental care system already stretched beyond its capacity to serve young children

  46. IMB Statewide Pilot • December 1999 • Pediatricians and family practitioners • Used Smart Smiles training session and educational materials, modified over time • Added training on billing procedures

  47. Statewide IMB Progression • Pilot – volunteer trainers • June 2000, RFA from HCFA to Medicaid agencies for Innovative ECC program • partners: Medicaid, UNC Schools of Public Health and Dentistry, NC Pediatric Society, NC Academy of Family Physicians, Oral Health Section • evaluate level of training required for MDs

  48. Dental Support • Fall 1999 NC Academy of Pediatric Dentistry endorsement • Spring 2000 NC Dental Society resolution of support • Fall 2001 NC Academy of Pediatric Dentistry reaffirmed support

More Related