140 likes | 281 Views
SPACE : AN EXPENSIVE AND LIMITED RESOURCE. MARIO BOUCHARD DIRECTOR PHYSICAL RESOURCES SERVICE. INTRODUCTION. Presentation of the University’s campus Cost of space Hybrid model of management Results and conclusion. UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA’S 3 MAJOR CAMPUSES. UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA.
E N D
SPACE : AN EXPENSIVE AND LIMITED RESOURCE MARIO BOUCHARD DIRECTOR PHYSICAL RESOURCES SERVICE
INTRODUCTION • Presentation of the University’s campus • Cost of space • Hybrid model of management • Results and conclusion PHYSICAL RESOURCES SERVICE
UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA’S 3 MAJOR CAMPUSES PHYSICAL RESOURCES SERVICE
UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA • 33,000 FTE (since 2001 – 50% increase) • 500,000m2 space • 3,000 parking space • 3,000 residents • 15 m2 / student FTE PHYSICAL RESOURCES SERVICE
TO CHARGE OR NOT TO CHARGE • ProsUltimate – accountability measure • Clear relationship • Cons • Cost and complexity • Lost of control • Hybrid model selected - Why? PHYSICAL RESOURCES SERVICE
WHAT IS THE COST OF SPACE? Operation $80 – $100 / m2 x 500,000 m2 $50M / year (close to 10% operational budget) Construction – Current replacement value $3,000 / m2 X 500,000 m2 $1,500M ($1.5B) PHYSICAL RESOURCES SERVICE
SPACE MANAGEMENT • HYBRID MODEL DEVELOPMENT -15 years ago - Good management of physical resources service • $ / m2 – operation • $ / m2 – construction Not involved in space Management 1. Restructuration space management transfer to our service 2. Strategic planning – good opportunity- potential 3. Sustainability (reduce the waste) instead of building PHYSICAL RESOURCES SERVICE
HYBRID MODEL DEVELOPMENT • Measure and understand who is using what (good software) • Assessment of needs • Develop internal expertise • Establish clear and strong policies and standards • Managed classrooms and computer lab centrally • Local management supported centrally PHYSICAL RESOURCES SERVICE
Hybrid model- finance • Capital project financing (50/50) • Space optimisation project (Incentive $3M) Strategic plan Evaluation process Typical 50/50 • Refurbishing –faculties and services 100% • Base building and O/M -central Note : Similarities with Energy conservation PHYSICAL RESOURCES SERVICE
RESULTS • Moving away from fighting • Getting – collaborative – incentive – part of the solution • Reinvestment into existing space $150M in the next 5 years • Annual facility renewal from $3M to $5M /yearFCI reduction from 0.15 to 0.11 • Reducing our environmental footprint 1.15 ton of CO2 / FTE – Targeting 1.0 ton in 2 years PHYSICAL RESOURCES SERVICE
CONCLUSION TO CHARGE OR NOT TO CHARGE • Space is expensive • Not required – to charge • Hybrid model – good results PHYSICAL RESOURCES SERVICE
CONCLUSION (cont’d) • Training tips SCUP Specialized consultant Space mining shop (Algonquin College) PHYSICAL RESOURCES SERVICE
CARTE DES TROIS CAMPUS PHYSICAL RESOURCES SERVICE