540 likes | 670 Views
Measuring eHealth Impact. An eHealth evaluation framework that leverages process control theory and big data analytics. Health 2013 Ottawa, Canada. The next 20 minutes…. What is the problem being addressed? Why is this problem… ummm … problematic? What is the new approach?
E N D
Measuring eHealth Impact An eHealth evaluation framework that leverages process control theory and big data analytics. Health 2013 Ottawa, Canada
The next 20 minutes… What is the problem being addressed? Why is this problem…ummm… problematic? What is the new approach? How is this different? Who cares… and why?
Why can’t we answer this question? There is a disheartening dearth of good science regarding the monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of eHealth projects But to be fair… It is a hard question!
What makes it a hard question? Healthcare is typically characterised as a complex adaptive system It is difficult to measure “health” The connection between eHealth and the health production function is not well understood
Key takeaways… Today, we do not have good science that quantifies the health impacts of eHealth This is an important question We need to answer it in order to be able to justify eHealth expenditures in the face of other uses of scarce funds
Embrace a “WHOLE SYSTEM” approach.
How do we characterise the system? How do we measure health? How are eHealth and health related?
Explaining system process control theory in 90 exhausting seconds
Measured inputs System Measured outputs
unMeasured inputs System unMeasured outputs
Controlled inputs System unControlled inputs
System FeedForward Process Control
System Inferential FeedForward Process Control
Feedback Process Control System
Inferential Feedback Process Control System
Hand in the tub Hand in the stream Watching the steam Feedback Feedforward Inferential
Examples… If a doctor orders meds, tracks the patient’s “readings” (blood pressure, fever, HbA1C), and adjusts the dosage accordingly – that is feedback control If Health Canada tracks the flu outbreaks in the southern hemisphere to inform next year’s flu shot cocktail, that is feedforward control
Key takeaways… We can shamelessly steal mature techniques from other disciplines to help us model the healthcare system Feedback and feedforward control may be exerted on any system where there are controlled inputs
More Aggregated HRQoL Indexes Generic Health Status Profiles Disease-specific Scales Multiple other indicators Less Aggregated
More Aggregated HRQoL Indexes Generic Health Status Profiles Disease-specific Scales Multiple other indicators Less Aggregated
0.0 1.0 DALY 0.75 QALY Disease weight Health related quality of life 0.0 1.0 AGE Premature death 45 years LE 60 years Onset of disability 10 years After Robberstad, Norskepidemiologi, 2005
∑QALY n = HALE n
What do we like about HALE? • A health adjusted life expectancy is usefully sensitive to morbidity as well as mortality • If we increase life expectancy, HALE goes up • If we reduce morbidity, HALE goes up • There are numerous HALE indicators • As it turns out, some may be calculated from standards-based eHealth transactional data
Key takeaways… Health adjusted life expectancy is a useful way to characterise population health We can calculate a HALE metric from eHealth transactional data
How do we tie it all together? We develop a model that leverages the underlying tools and techniques We are working with complex adaptive systems… this affects our choice of an approach We must favour sense & adaptover plan & control
Inform Operationalizes Population-level health metrics Health Interventions eHealth Infrastructure Population Health Person-centric transactional data Generate Yield
Health Interventions Population Health Yield
Operationalizes Health Interventions eHealth Infrastructure Population Health Yield
Operationalizes Health Interventions eHealth Infrastructure Population Health Person-centric transactional data Generate Yield
Operationalizes Population-level health metrics Health Interventions eHealth Infrastructure Population Health Person-centric transactional data Generate Yield
Inform Operationalizes Population-level health metrics Health Interventions eHealth Infrastructure Population Health Person-centric transactional data Generate Yield
Key takeaways… We can employ process control loops and big data analytics to create a cyclic model This model may be employed to operationalize continuous quality improvement
How does this approach compare? Inputs Processes Outputs Outcomes Impacts Traditional logic framework approaches are “pipeline” based Common M&E approaches focus on outputs… or sometimes on outcomes… but not on impacts
The Role of eHealth • eHealth infrastructure, at scale: • Supports care continuity over time and across different sites • Operationalizes guideline-based care • Health “transactions”: • Provide management metrics regarding care delivery • May be aggregated to generate population indicators
Standard Operating Procedures SOP-based Interventions Pervasive eHealth Infrastructure Modify SOP eHealth Transactional Data Financial, Management & Population Health Indicators
Operationalize guideline-based care Standard Operating Procedures SOP-based Interventions Pervasive eHealth Infrastructure Modify SOP eHealth Transactional Data Financial, Management & Population Health Indicators
Standard Operating Procedures SOP-based Interventions Pervasive eHealth Infrastructure Modify SOP eHealth Transactional Data Support care continuity Financial, Management & Population Health Indicators
Standard Operating Procedures SOP-based Interventions Pervasive eHealth Infrastructure Modify SOP eHealth Transactional Data Financial, Management & Population Health Indicators Provide management metrics
Standard Operating Procedures SOP-based Interventions Pervasive eHealth Infrastructure Modify SOP eHealth Transactional Data Financial, Management & Population Health Indicators Provide population indicators