1 / 42

Vienna Central European Seminar Particle Physics and the LHC Jeroen van Tilburg

Status and physics at LHCb. Vienna Central European Seminar Particle Physics and the LHC Jeroen van Tilburg Physikalisches Institut Heidelberg On behalf of the LHCb collaboration. Outline LHCb experiment and detector performance Selected physics results Outlook and summary.

manjit
Download Presentation

Vienna Central European Seminar Particle Physics and the LHC Jeroen van Tilburg

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Status and physics at LHCb Vienna Central European Seminar Particle Physics and the LHC Jeroen van Tilburg Physikalisches Institut Heidelberg On behalf of the LHCb collaboration • Outline • LHCb experiment and detector performance • Selected physics results • Outlook and summary Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  2. New physics effects in B and D decays s b b s Strength of indirect approach • New particles can appear as virtual particles in loop and penguin diagrams. • Indirect searches have a high sensitivity to effects from new particles. • Can see NP effects before the direct searches. • Indirect measurements can access higher scales. • Possible to measure the phases of the new couplings • New physics at TeV scale must have a flavour structure to provide suppression of FCNC. b s b → Complementary to direct searches. s s b Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  3. CKM picture Current fit results: • Incredible success of CKM paradigm in last decades. • All measurements coherent with CKM of SM. • Accuracy of angles determined by experiment • Accuracy of sides determined by theoretical uncertainties • But, SM fails to explain matter-antimatter asymmetry in the Universe • New physics must hold additional sources of CP violation • Effects are small but there is still room for NP effects. • Precision measurement of CKM elements. • Comparison between tree and penguin decays. • Not all CKM angles well constrained (e.g. γ and βs). From CKMFitter → CP violation and rare decays of B hadronsand charm are the main focus of LHCb  Large amounts of clean data available  Precision tests: allow to look for small effects beyond SM Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  4. LHCb detector LHCb made for Heavy Flavour physics • Good vertex resolution • Time-dependent measurements. • Suppress background from prompt decays. • Good particle identification • Important for trigger, flavour tagging • Suppress background. • Good momentum resolution • Mass resolution of heavy flavours. • Suppress background. Muon RICH1+2 Calo Tracking stations Velo Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  5. LHCb detector • High B hadron production at LHC • bb= 284 ± 53 b (√s = 7 TeV) [PLB 694 209] • Forward spectrometer • Most B hadrons produced along beam axis. • Acceptance: 2 < η < 5. Complementary to GPD’s. • Vertex detector close to beam. • Easy access to planar subdetectors. Angular coverage optimised for B-physics. L~1 cm Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  6. Collaboration 760 members 15 countries 54 institutes Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  7. Detector performance: Luminosity • LHCb recorded 1.1 fb−1 in 2011 • Data taking ended on 30 Oct. • Only ~340 pb−1 used for most results shown here. • Data taken with high efficiency ~90% • Offline data quality rejects < 1% • Sub-detectors all with > 98% active channels. • Luminosity leveling • LHCb already running above design lumi • Average L~3×1032 cm−2s−1 (nominal 2×1032) • Need to cope with higher occupancies • More pile-up: average ~1.5 (nominal 0.5) • Continuous, automatic adjustment of offset of colliding beams. • Allows optimal conditions throughout a fill. Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  8. Detector performance: vertex resolution VELO tomography with hadronic vertices Sensors • VELO sensors only 8 mm from beam. • Impact parameter resolution = 12 mfor high pT tracks. • Good primary and secondary vertex resolution. • Suppress background from prompt decays. • Good proper-time resolution • Important for time-dependent measurements. RF foil 8 mm Beamaxis …in good agreement with simulation Primary vertex resolution Decay time in Bs → J/ψ Prompt J/y Bs J/y f [LHCb-CONF-2011-049] Resolution from prompt J/ψ: t= 50 fs Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  9. Detector performance: PID • Particle ID with RICH detectors • Kaon ID efficiency ≈ 96%, • misID π→K ≈ 7% • Particle ID with Muon detector • Muon ID efficiency 97.3±1.2% (p>4 GeV/c) • misID π→μ ≈ 2.4%, p→μ ≈ 0.18% • Flavour tagging • Tagging of production flavour (B or B) • Important for mixing & CP analyses. • Performance calibrated using control channels such as B+ → J/ψ K+ • Tagging power: ε(1-2ω)2= • (3.2 ± 0.8) % (opposite side) • (1.3 ± 0.4) % (same side)from Bs→Ds mixing analysispreliminary [LHCb-CONF-2011-049] Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  10. Detector performance: mass resolution Dimuon mass spectrum • Integrated Bdl ~ 4 Tm • Accurate field map and alignment • Momentum resolution 0.4–0.6 % • Mass resolution J/: 13 MeV • MC: 10 MeV • → Accurate mass measurements. LHCb-CONF-2011-027 Preliminary Measured B masses [MeV/c2] PDG 5279.17 ± 0.29 5279.50 ± 0.30 5279.50 ± 0.30 5366.30 ± 0.60 5620.2 ± 1.6 6277 ± 6 World-best mass measurements! (2010 data only) Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  11. Selected physics results Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  12. Measurement of Δms [LHCb-CONF-2011-50] • ∆ms: Bs-Bs mixing frequency using Bs→Ds • Flavour specific final state • High branching ratio (~0.3%) • Important to resolve the fast Bs oscillations. • Average decay time resolution ~45 fs • Event selection based on kaon ID, track IP and vertex χ2 • ∆ms extracted from unbinned ML fit to Bs→Ds candidates • Uses mass, decay time and flavour tagging • Method includes now same side tagging (cf 2010 fit) Event yield in 340 pb−1 Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  13. Measurement of Δms [LHCb-CONF-2011-50] Bs oscillations Dilution of mixing amplitude from tagging and proper time Most precise measurement of Δms Preliminary Δms=17.725 ± 0.041(stat) ± 0.025 (sys) ps−1 Dominant systematics uncertainty: z-scale and momentum scale Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  14. Measurement of s from Bs→ J//f0 • s: interference phase between Bs mixing and b→ccs decay. • Small penguin pollution. • Bs counterpart of Bd→ J/ K0. • Small in SM: s = −0.036±0.002 • Prediction from CKMfitter 2011 • New particles in box diagrams can modify measured phase s = sSM + sNP Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  15. Measurement of s Two decay modes Bs→ J/ Bs→ J/f0(980) LHCb-CONF-049 LHCb-CONF-051 → First seen by LHCb last winter  Narrow  resonance (clean)  Vector-vector final state (requires angular analysis)  CP odd final state (no angular analysis)  BR about 20% of Bs→ J/ Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  16. Measurement of s Angular analysis of Bs→ J/ • Bs→ J/ has vector-vector final state: • Mixture of CP-odd and CP-even decay amplitudes • Even and odd amplitudes can be disentangled using decay angles. Transversity angles Decay amplitudes used in fit: P wave → S wave(non resonant K+K-) Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  17. Measurement of s Angular analysis of Bs→ J/ PDF of unbinned ML fit described as: Complicated PDF: 3 independent implementations in LHCb Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  18. Measurement of s Angular analysis of Bs→ J/ Time and angular distributions Main systematic errors from uncertainties in the description of angular and decay time acceptance and background angular distribution. Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  19. Measurement of s Result of the two fits Bs→ J/ Bs→ J/f0(980) CL contours obtained using Γs from J/ψφ. Two solutions: PDF insensitive to CP-odd final state, cannot determine Γs and ΔΓs simultaneously. When using both Γs and ΔΓs from Bs→J/ψφ: s =-0.44±0.44(stat)±0.02(syst) Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  20. Measurement of s Comparison with Tevatron Combined fit s=-0.03 ± 0.16(stat) ± 0.07 (sys) Preliminary LHCb-CONF-2011-056 • Next steps: • Resolve ambiguity by fitting S-wave phase in bins of M(KK) • Y. Xie et al., JHEP 0909:074 (2009) • Included more data (2.5 times more data recorded) • Include same-side tagging (~1.5x more tagging power) • → Expect ~2x smaller statistical error. Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  21. Direct CP in Bd,s→K Charmless charged two-body B decays Tree Penguin Tree-penguin interference in Bd,s→K  decays allows to look for direct CP violation. • LHCb has a very good particle identification capability. • Isolate decays contributing to B->hh’ (K,,p) Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  22. Direct CP in Bd,s→K Bd,s→K+p-: Clear asymmetry in raw distributions B0→K+ p- B0→K- p+ [LHCb-CONF-2011-042] Bs →p+ K- Bs →p- K+ Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  23. Direct CP in Bd,s→K Raw asymmetry has to be corrected for detector and production asymmetry. Detector asymmetry → measured using charm control samples: D*+→D0(K)+, D*+→D0(KK)+ and D0→K. • Production asymmetry • κ: dilution of Aprod due to B mixing, lifetime and acceptance κ(B0)~0.3, κ(Bs)~-0.03 • Aprod measured using B0→J/ K*(K) [LHCb-CONF-2011-042] Interaction asymmetry L/R detector asymmetry Final correction factors: Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  24. Direct CP in Bd,s→K Preliminary [LHCb-CONF-2011-042] ACP for K modes WA: → Most precise, and first 5 observation of CP violation in hadronic machine. → first 3 evidence of CP violation in Bs0→πK Also measured BRs for CP eigenmodes → First observation of Bs→ • Eventual goal to measure time-dependent asymmetries in e.g. B(s) →+-, K+K-→ determine CKM angle γ from loop decays • Compare to γ measurements from tree decays, e.g. • B+/0→D0K+/*: ADS+GLW and Dalitz method. • Bs→DsK: Time-dependent, tagged analysis. • → determine any contribution from new physics Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  25. Search for Bd,s  +− The decay Bd,s →+− provides sensitive probe for New Physics. • Very rare decay (FCNC and helicity suppressed) BR(Bs  +−)SM = (3.2 ± 0.2)x10−9 • BR(Bd  +−)SM = (1.1 ± 0.1)x10−10 • Sensitive to New Physics: • E.g. branching ratio in MSSM enhanced by sixth power of tan: A.J.Buras, arXiv:1012.1447 Exclusion regions in MSSM (NUHM) [EPJ C64 391] Blue: Allowed regions for given BR measurement Recent excitement from CDF measurement: BR(Bs  +−) = (1.8 )x10−8 (7 fb-1) arXiv:1107.2304 +1.1−0.9 Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  26. Search for Bd,s  +− Selection & analysis strategy • Loose selection to reduce data set • Evaluate signal/background in a 2D-space of • Invariant mass m • MVA classifier BDT combining kinematic and geometrical variables • Data driven calibration through control channels and mass sidebands • Normalize to channels with known BR Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  27. Search for Bd,s  +− Expected mass resolution obtained from interpolation of dimuon resonances (from J/ to ’s) → Verified with B → hh events [LHCb-CONF-2011-037] Mmm for signal region in 4 bins of BDT • Mass distribution studied in 4 bins of BDT • Expect ~ 1 event in each bin from SM. • Main background from bb→X and misidentified B→h+h− Small excess (2 events) in most sensitive bin, compatible with SM. Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  28. Search for Bd,s  +− Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  29. Search for Bd,s  +− Normalization The final branching ratio can be calculated as: Three complementary normalization channels with very different systematics: Production ratio fs/fd taken from LHCb’s measurements using semileptonic and hadronic decays. → Smaller error than HFAG average. → Dominant systematic error. LHCb-CONF-034 Values for αvery compatible Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  30. Search for Bd,s  +− • No significant excess observed in 0.3 fb-1 • Upper limits (preliminary): • BR(Bs  +−)< 1.5 x 10−8 (95% CL) • BR(Bd  +−)< 5.2 x 10−9 (95% CL) • CMS also set a limit this Summer with 1.1 fb-1 • BR(Bs  +−)< 1.9 x 10−8 (95% CL)arXiv:1107.5834 • LHCb + CMS analyses combined (preliminary) • BR(Bs  +−)< 1.1 x 10−8 (95% CL) • This is ~ 3.4 × SM value • Most probable value ~ 4 × 10-9 • Excess over SM not confirmed. [LHCb-CONF-2011-037] LHCb-CONF-2011-047 Future prospects arXiv:1108.3018 Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  31. Angular distributions in Bd  +−K* Flipping the b→sdiagram… • Bd  +−K* rare decay in the SM. • BR (Bd  l+l−K*) ~ 1.0 x 10−6 • SM diagrams can be easily modified in presence of NP • Angular distributions contain a lot of information. • Many observables probe helicity structure of NP • Zero crossing point of AFB(q2) well predictedin SM • Hadronic uncertainties are minimized • Measures ratio Wilson coefficients C9/C7. • Sensitive to SUSY, graviton exchanges, extra dimensions… Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  32. Angular distributions in Bd  +−K* Results from CDF & B-factories show intriguing behaviour at low q2 : → however, precision is limited. [arXiv:1101.0470] SM C7=-C7SM Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  33. Angular distributions in Bd  +−K* Event selection 302 signal events • 309 pb-1 in 2011 • 302 signal candidates • B/S ~ 0.3 [LHCb-CONF-2011-038] Bd mass window • Selection using BDT • BDT variables chosen to minimize acceptance effects • Angular acceptance from MC • Trained on Bd  J/K* for signal and mass sidebands for background (2S) veto J/ veto Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  34. Angular distributions in Bd  +−K* Angular fit • Not enough data yet to perform full angular analysis. • → Measure in 6 q2 bins: • AFB • Longitudinal polarisation, FL • Differential branching fraction dГ/dq2 • → Fit AFB andFL using the 1D projections of θl and θK Used Bd  J/K* to validate fitting procedure and angular acceptance Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  35. Angular distributions in Bd  +−K* In bin LHCb Theory LHCb-CONF-2011-038 Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  36. Angular distributions in Bd  +−K* Data consistent with SM predictions at present sensitivity and indicate that AFB is changing sign as predicted by the SM (most recent CDF result also has negative first bin: arXiv:1108.0695) Already effective in constraining NP arXiv:1111.1257 • Next steps • Determine zero-crossing point in AFB(q2) • Add phi angle and AT(2) • Include full 2011 data set. • With > 2 fb-1 do full angular analysis Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  37. Charm physics Mixing established in the charm sector. Next step: look for CP violation • No mixing excluded at 10.2 • Presence of mixing allows to search for indirect CPV • CP violation expected to be very small in SM • Good place to look for new physics effects. HFAG averages x=(0.63±0.19)% y=(0.75±0.12)% Many opportunities for charm physics at LHCb [LHCb-CONF-2011-023] • Dedicated trigger lines for charm decays • Yield of O(108) events per fb−1 • Flavour tag from charge of slow pion. • Large statistics available • > 106 D0 K+K-from D*+ D0p+ D0 K+K- Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  38. Charm physics [LHCb-CONF-2011-054] yCP in D0→K+K- (CPV in mixing) Combined with measurement of y gives access to CPV. Measurement (2010 only; 28 pb-1): [LHCb-CONF-2011-046] AГ in D0→K+K- (CPV in mixing) Measurement (2010 only; 28 pb-1): LHCb is currently updating with more statistics Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  39. Charm physics ΔACP in D0→h+h- (CPV in decay) Preliminary New result! Only presented last week at HCP [LHCb-CONF-2011-061] Production and detector asymmetry cancel. Measurement (2011 only; 580 pb-1): Signifance 3.5 First evidence of CP violation in charm sector! Preliminary 0.4 M events 1.4 M events Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  40. LHCb Upgrade • Main limitation that prevents exploiting higher luminosity is the Level-0 (hardware) trigger • To keep output rate < 1 MHz requires raising thresholds  hadronic yields reach plateau • Proposed upgrade is to remove hardware trigger read out detector at 40 MHz (bunch crossing rate)Trigger fully in software in CPU farm. • Will allow to increase luminosity by factor ~ 5 to 1–2 × 1033 cm-2 s-1 • Requires replacing front-end electronicsand part of tracking system. Planned for the long shutdown in 2018. Running for 10 years will then give ~ 50 fb-1 • Letter of Intent recently submitted to the LHCCPhysics case endorsed, detector R&D underway (e.g. scintillating-fibre tracking, TOF, …) Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  41. LHCb Upgrade LHCb Upgrade LoI: CERN-LHCC-2011-001 Integrated luminosity of order 50 fb-1 allows to measure NP effects below the % level. Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

  42. Conclusion • LHCb will have huge contribution to flavour physics in the years to come. • LHCb will perform the precision measurements needed to see effects from new physics. • The future will bring an even better understanding of our detector and much more statistics! • Hope to see first hints from new physics soon. • Expect more interesting results this Winter. • No time to mention: • Bs    and other radiative B decays. • Semileptonic B decays • Electroweak physics. • Higgs and exotica. • LFV tau decays • And much, much more… Status and physics at LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg

More Related